From this thread it seems the French are at it too.Brits no doubt; from Eddi's muse "Butterfly".
And then there's 'Jesus in India'.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
From this thread it seems the French are at it too.Brits no doubt; from Eddi's muse "Butterfly".
And the "lost tribes" crop up everywhere, but the mishegas that tend to irritate me the most is the tired old {Jesus=Osiris}/{Christianity=Mithraism} silliness.And then there's 'Jesus in India'.
Also Jesus was in the Himalayan region during his missing years.I keep hearing certain folks going on about how Jesus was a king. Josephus wrote the Gospels. Jesus is buried in England. Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene. All this.
Where does this, frankly, rubbish come from? Any New Testament scholar will tell you that we know next to nothing about he historical Jesus so who came up with these ramblings and from where?
You're not seriously suggesting that Jesus didn't spend his missing years living in Glastonbury? Come on.I keep hearing certain folks going on about how Jesus was a king. Josephus wrote the Gospels. Jesus is buried in England. Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene. All this.
Where does this, frankly, rubbish come from? Any New Testament scholar will tell you that we know next to nothing about he historical Jesus so who came up with these ramblings and from where?
That explains much of the nonsense in this world...., for me, I consider what psychics and channels have to tell us about the life of Jesus.
Says so in the Gospel according to Merlin.Jesus is buried in England.
'Jesus in India'
This is the kind of nonsense that makes me want to smash my head against a wall.He concluded that the account in the gospels is a myth based on the history of ancient India. However, Jacolliot was comparing two different periods of history (or mythology) and did not claim that Jesus was in India. Jacolliot used the spelling "Christna" instead of "Krishna" and claimed that Krishna's disciples gave him the name "Jezeus," a name supposed to mean "pure essence" in Sanskrit.[30] However, according to Max Müller, that is not a Sanskrit term at all and "it was simply invented" by Jacolliot.
Well, that's interesting. So the "christian foil hat society" has non-christian associates?My leading theory is that he had five children with his wife Mary Magdalene in southern France after his swoon (recovery from crucifixion wounds).
Which is probably similar to what your ancestors said when they heard the round earth theory...lolThat explains much of the nonsense in this world.
Just interested in the truth myself.Well, that's interesting. So the "christian foil hat society" has non-christian associates.
He writes purty good English for a foreigner.Says so in the Gospel according to Merlin.
"Ande Jesus when he was kill'd and dead, they carri'd him backe to the lande of his brethren, sweet Anglia." (Mer. 29:14)
@Rival , the way I heard it ...Modern scholars believe the term "his brethren" refers to the Ten Lost Tribes, who, according to the Apostle Merlin, had been exiled all the way to Britain.
Jesus is referred to as the King of the Jews. So this is not so strange to meI keep hearing certain folks going on about how Jesus was a king
I never heard that one. I just saw a YouTube that all billionaires come to Britain; maybe Jesus did pave the wayJesus is buried in England
That one I hear a lot.Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene
Yes but this is not referring to an actual king, as Jesus clearly wasn't, according to the narrative. The way I've heard it said is that Jesus was a bona fide king with crown and sceptre.Jesus is referred to as the King of the Jews. So this is not so strange to me
Who? St. Merlin?He writes purty good English for a foreigner.
Yup.Who? St. Merlin?
Wasn't he born in Britain?Yup.
That's why I called him a foreigner.Wasn't he born in Britain?
- Claims of Jesus Christ in India and/or Tibet before crucifixion
- Louis Jacolliot, 1869 - "The idea of Indian influences on Jesus (and Christianity) has been suggested in Louis Jacolliot's book La Bible dans l'Inde, Vie de Iezeus Christna (1869)[29] (The Bible in India, or the Life of Jezeus Christna), although Jacolliot does not claim travels by Jesus to India.
- Jacolliot compared the accounts of the life of Bhagavan Krishna with that of Jesus Christ in the gospels and concluded that it could not have been a coincidence that the two stories have so many similarities in many of the finer details. He concluded that the account in the gospels is a myth based on the history of ancient India. However, Jacolliot was comparing two different periods of history (or mythology) and did not claim that Jesus was in India. Jacolliot used the spelling "Christna" instead of "Krishna" and claimed that Krishna's disciples gave him the name "Jezeus," a name supposed to mean "pure essence" in Sanskrit.[30] However, according to Max Müller, that is not a Sanskrit term at all and "it was simply invented" by Jacolliot.
- Nicolas Notovich, 1887 - In 1887, a Russian war correspondent, Nicolas Notovich, claimed that while at the Hemis Monastery in Ladakh, he had learned of a document called the "Life of Saint Issa, Best of the Sons of Men" – Isa being the Arabic name of Jesus in Islam.[32][33] Notovitch's story, with a translated text of the "Life of Saint Issa," was published in French in 1894 as La vie inconnue de Jesus Christ (Unknown Life of Jesus Christ).
- According to the scrolls, Jesus abandoned Jerusalem at the age of 13 and set out towards Sind, “intending to improve and perfect himself in the divine understanding and to studying the laws of the great Buddha”. He crossed Punjab and reached Puri Jagannath where he studied the Vedas under Brahmin priests. He spent six years in Puri and Rajgirh, near Nalanda, the ancient seat of Hindu learning. Then he went to the Himalayas, and spent time in Tibetan monasteries, studying Buddhism, and through Persia, returned to Jerusalem at the age of 29.o have had.
- Swami Abhedananda, 1922 -In 1922 Swami Abhedananda, the founder of Vedanta Society of New York 1897 and the author of several books, went to Himalayas on foot and reached Tibet, where he studied Buddhistic philosophy and Lamaism. He was one of the skeptics who tried to debunk Nicholas Notovitch and disprove the existence of the manuscript about Jesus in India. However, when he reached Hemis monastery he found the manuscript which was a Tibetan translation of the original scrolls written in Pali. The lama said that it was a copy and the original was in a monastery at Marbour near Lhasa. After Abhedananda's death in 1939, one of his disciples inquired about the documents at the Hemis monastery, but was told they disappeared.
- Levi H. Dowling, 1908 - In 1908, Levi H. Dowling published the Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ which he claimed was channeled to him from the "Akashic Records" as the true story of the life of Jesus, including "the 'lost' eighteen years silent in the New Testament." The narrative follows the young Jesus across India, Tibet, Persia, Assyria, Greece and Egypt.[43] Dowling's work was later used by Holger Kersten who combined it with elements derived from other sources such as the Ahmadiyya beliefs.
- Nicholas Roerich, 1925 - In 1925, Nicholas Roerich recorded his travels through Ladak in India. This portion of his journal was published in 1933 as part of Altai Himalaya. He recounts legends of Issa shared with him by the Ladak people and lamas including that Issa (Jesus) traveled from Israel to India with merchants and taught the people. An extended section of this text parallels sections of Notovitch's book and Roerich comments on the remarkable similarity of the accounts of the Ladak to these passages, despite the Ladak's having no knowledge of Notovitch's book. He also recounts that the stories of others on his travel refer to various manuscripts and legends regarding Jesus (Issa) and that he personally visited the "abbot" of Hemis.