Somehow I don't think witches are going to attend Christian churches. Gays do.
Good point.
Last edited:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Somehow I don't think witches are going to attend Christian churches. Gays do.
Two centuries ago, pretty much all European witches were Christians. There's still a few hanging around.Somehow I don't think witches are going to attend Christian churches. Gays do.
Opportunistic scam, nothing more. Sue the people doing harm to him, aka his family, not a book which has no capability to do anything. Maybe sue Jesus instead.
The case in the OP reminded me of that case. Maybe the OP case was a response to that one, given the similarities. Maybe there is just a new trend of people being stupid and handwriting suits and trying to represent themselves?Sylvia Driskell — acting on behalf of her plaintiffs God, and His Son, Jesus Christ — listed as the defendants anyone who is a homosexual or goes by the alias of “gay.” While it is clear that Driskell considers homosexuals to be abominations who shouldn’t be allowed to marry, it’s not clear what she expects the Omaha district court to do about it.
The 66-year-old asks “to be heard in the matter of homosexuality, is homosexuality a sin, or is it not?” In her careful cursive script, Driskell cites the favored biblical passages of bigots — Leviticus 18:22 and Romans 1:26 — before complaining that she’s heard “the boasting of the Defendant Homosexuals on the world news; from the Young to the Old; to the rich an [sic] famous, and to the not so rich an [sic] famous. How they were tired of hiding in the closet and how glad they were to be coming out of the closet.”
Nebraska woman files lawsuit against all the homosexuals for being gay - Salon.com
Unfortunately, anyone can file a lawsuit against anyone for any reason.
You can rest assured, this case will be dismissed, as it should be.It was only a matter of time.
Much as I support equality and rights for homosexuals, this is an outright greedy attempt to just make some easy peezy moola with hopes of living a life of luxury.(Hey I'm only posting a news article.)
Gay Man Files $70M Suit Against Bible Publishers Over ‘Homosexual’ Verses
A homosexual man has filed a $70 million lawsuit against Bible publishers Zondervan and Thomas Nelson, alleging that their version of the Bible that refers to homosexuality as a sin violates his constitutional rights and has caused him emotional distress.
Thoughts from RF members?
Link for those who wish to read entire article.
What point? That he feels he has the right to censor everything that might offend him and prevent others from having access to it?I can see his point, and I feel that is all he wants us to see, simple.
You certainly haven't read the crap in the bible.What point? That he feels he has the right to censor everything that might offend him and prevent others from having access to it?
That would be a little harder. The Hebrew word you are translating as "witch" in Hebrew is "MaKHaSHeFaH", which literally means, "one (female) who does kishuf". First you would need to establish the difference between "kishuf" and the other 8 forms of supernatural feats listed in Deut. 18:10, in order to prove that what the "witch" is doing constitutes the Biblical definition of "kishuf".Well, hell I guess witches and sorcerers can file multi-million dollar lawsuits against bible publishers over Exodus 22:18 "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live."
So, the neighbours had a case to sue.I don't know the specifics, but there was a woman some time ago who was feared by everyone in her neighborhood because she'd file lawsuits against people for the most idiotic things. They were always thrown out of court, but it caused her neighbors grief nevertheless.
Yes, I have. It isn't my place to censor such things, or expect people to not have access to it. If we start doing that, then it won't be long before everyone is demanding anything that offends them be censored and punishable for various reasons. For decades people have tried such things against various musicians, books, and movies. Even if it offends you greatly, attempts to silence and punish should never succeed because a the principles that a secular liberal democracy is based on can only succeed if we, at least minimally, tolerate the views and choices of others, so long as they aren't causing harm to another. I don't doubt the person who filled the suit was harmed, but he should go after those who harmed him, not an inanimate object: for him to have a valid claim, you would have to find that a great majority of Christians are abusive towards homosexuals, and that just is not the case. Many are, but many aren't. It's no different than blaming heavy metal music or video games for violence.You certainly haven't read the crap in the bible.
Ya know Jeags, this article is so dissembling it may as well be a flat out lie.(Hey I'm only posting a news article)
The whole thing is that I am sure he didn't mean for anyone to take it serious, he was simply making a point, that you seem to not understand, Christianity should keep its nose out of peoples lives, and what they do with their sexual organs, has nothing to do with them.Yes, I have. It isn't my place to censor such things, or expect people to not have access to it. If we start doing that, then it won't be long before everyone is demanding anything that offends them be censored and punishable for various reasons. For decades people have tried such things against various musicians, books, and movies. Even if it offends you greatly, attempts to silence and punish should never succeed because a the principles that a secular liberal democracy is based on can only succeed if we, at least minimally, tolerate the views and choices of others, so long as they aren't causing harm to another. I don't doubt the person who filled the suit was harmed, but he should go after those who harmed him, not an inanimate object: for him to have a valid claim, you would have to find that a great majority of Christians are abusive towards homosexuals, and that just is not the case. Many are, but many aren't. It's no different than blaming heavy metal music or video games for violence.
Somehow I don't think witches are going to attend Christian churches. Gays do.
The whole thing is that I am sure he didn't mean for anyone to take it serious, he was simply making a point, that you seem to not understand, Christianity should keep its nose out of peoples lives, and what they do with their sexual organs, has nothing to do with them.
Let's hold you to that. If this gets dismissed you can with little cost, or if defendants are awarded attorney fees, then you let go of advocating for loser pays and start trumpeting how great our court system is.This is why we need a "loser pay" tort system.
Frivolous suers should pay for the losses they cause.
The plaintiff just needs to grow a pair, & get over the fact that not everyone will think he's a special snowflake.
Well whatever, but I am glade he did it, good on him I say.Sure, and I'd agree with that point. But in making it in this manner, he clogs the courts for no good reason. It's frivolous.
If an atheist decides to sue over lines about unbelievers going to hell, or something, I'd say the same.
Well whatever, but I am glade he did it, good on him I say.