Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What language softening? You should watch George Carlin if you want examples of sugar coating and softening language. Gay doesn't mean homosexual, but rather a homosexual male, and lesbian refers to homosexual women.Has society undergone so much pussification that everything has to be sugar coated now?
What language softening? You should watch George Carlin if you want examples of sugar coating and softening language. Gay doesn't mean homosexual, but rather a homosexual male, and lesbian refers to homosexual women.
Gay means to be homosexual. So why do women go by lesbian instead of gay? Is this some type of label thing like black vs African American? Softer language perhaps? Has society undergone so much pussification that everything has to be sugar coated now?
I thought he was brilliant and very insightful, especially when it came to words, the peculiar things we say in English (one of my favorites is "no, **** you, I'm not getting on the plane, I'm getting in the plane."), and euphemisms. He was also dead on when it came to his political/corporate rants, and he had great observations such as when he pointed out that t-shirts have basically turned us all into a bunch of walking billboards. He was even really pro-female (I wouldn't say feminist because he detached himself from any labels) and strongly against the whole "macho man" crap that causes some real issues for men. I don't know if he coined the phrase softening language (though I hardly ever hear outside of his comedy bits), but the things he would go on about regarding this softening were things like how we don't die, we "pass away," toilet paper becoming "bathroom tissue," or moles becoming "beauty marks."Now that you mentioned Carlin--and since the OP contains a word coined by him, as far as I know--I just want to state my opinion that he was a tasteless piece of trash. Just another glorified lowlife.
Blah, blah, blah, I'll just take it to mean happy and jolly like I read it in Lord of the Rings!By 1955, the word gay now officially acquired the new added definition of meaning homosexual males. Gay men themselves seem to have been behind the driving thrust for this new definition as they felt (and many still do), that “homosexual” is much too clinical, sounding like a disorder. As such, it was common amongst the gay community to refer to one another as “gay” decades before this was a commonly known definition (reportedly homosexual men were calling one another gay as early as the 1920s). At this time, homosexual women were referred to as lesbians, not gay. Although women could still be called gay if they were prostitutes as that meaning had not yet 100% disappeared.
Why do you care what they want to call themselves? Are lesbians not allowed to have their own culture, apart from men? Mind your own damn business. This is coming off as very sexist.Definitions sources I looked at:
Merriam Webster: sexually attracted to someone who is the same sex
Urban Dictionary: a homosexual male or female
Wikipedia: a term that primarily refers to a homosexual person or the trait of being homosexual
Dictionary.com: of, relating to, or exhibiting sexual desire or behavior directed toward a person or persons of one's own sex
Oxford Dictionary: homosexual
Some of the entries had a history of the term and did indicate that gay meant homosexual, especially with men, but the term was fully functional in describing females as well. So, it seems that the use of the term lesbian is no longer needed, outside of wanting a different label to distinguish one's self apart from men. Just saying...
Why do you care what they want to call themselves? Are lesbians not allowed to have their own culture, apart from men? Mind your own damn business. This is coming off as very sexist.
Are you 10? Grow up. You're the one throwing around sexist and homophobic insults and being all uppity over what words lesbians identify themselves by. I still would like to know why you care what lesbians call themselves. They have their own community, separate from gay men. Gay men and lesbians actually don't hang around each other in general all that much. They have their own social spheres and subcultures. If you're not part of their community, it's none of your business what they want to call themselves.Someone sounds butthurt.
in my countless decades of observing language, I say "gay" refers to all homosexuals, but males in particular.
The context determines which usage applies.
Things have changed a lot since you were playing fetch with your dinosaur.n my countless decades of observing language, I say "gay" refers to all homosexuals, but males in particular.
"Dino" was just his name!Things have changed a lot since you were playing fetch with your dinosaur.
In some contexts, it is used as an equivalent.For most of western history, people finding out that you'd had homosex was license to go all leviticus and kill you. Especially if you were male. Having code words was simple selfpreservation.
But the words and their various meanings do exist and we know what they are mostly. Here in the 21st century USA lesbian is a subset of gay, and there just isn't a male equivalent.
But obsessing over words is so much fun!People who make an issue out of that, are the ones with the problem, IMHO. How important it is is what matters.
I've known homosexual women who would not join the local group called the Gay/Straight Alliance. They were not gay nor straight, they were lesbian! Some people will go to great lengths to feel excluded and victimized. Merely being invited by a lesbian, to a meeting chaired by a lesbian, to help improve the lives of lesbians wasn't good enough.
Tom