Gender Apartheid

[ImmortalFlame]

So I question your sources and you respond with a vicious, personal attack / strawman?

Nope. Neither of those things.

You didn't even READ my sources, you just dismissed them - because you don't care about war crimes, as long as those war crimes are against Muslims.

Not a good look for you.

Compared to your total dismissal of literally all the sources I provided with no basis whatsoever?

You're not equipped to judge. I believe you're only in this debate because you hate Muslims and want to justify their murder.

 

[Ignatius A]

I've literally said it repeatedly to you.


Wow. So you believe that since Hamas did a bad thing, that means Israel can respond whatever way it wants, including the mass death of civilians and an assortment of war crimes?

Out of curiosity, if I could demonstrate Israel committed any kind of war crime against Gaza or Palestine prior to October 7th, would that justify what Hamas did? Yes or no?

No I not believe israel can respond whatever way it wants and never claimed such. Learn to read. What I have a problem with is listening to the whining from hamas apologists about dead civilians when they do thee exact same thing.

 

[ImmortalFlame]

No I not believe israel can respond whatever way it wants and never claimed such.

Hooray!

So, we're starting to find common ground. Israel CANNOT just respond however it wants and we just need to agree on where those limits are.

Let's start with an obvious one: actions designed to disproportionately harm civilian rather than military targets. Should they be okay or not?

What I have a problem with is listening to the whining from hamas apologists about dead civilians when they do thee exact same thing.

Which Hamas apologists? Can you quote anyone here expressing support for Hamas? Anyone here who has said their actions are justified? Where?

Meanwhile, I can find multiple quotes of you explicitly stating that war crimes against civilians are justified.

 

[Koldo]

Oh i see so hamas is allowed to kill innocent jews (the people that Hamas themselves claim to have no problem with) because you don't have very high standards for them?

How did you reach this conclusion?

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

Nope. Neither of those things.

You didn't even READ my sources, you just dismissed them - because you don't care about war crimes, as long as those war crimes are against Muslims.


Compared to your total dismissal of literally all the sources I provided with no basis whatsoever?

You're not equipped to judge. I believe you're only in this debate because you hate Muslims and want to justify their murder.

I keep reminding people that Palestinian Christians have been murdered by the IDF, too, but it seems people care even less about them. Certainly the "Christians" on here don't give a damn about them. So their hatred of Muslims/Arabs outweighs their concern for other Christians. And it's not even just Palestinians. Christians in general are treated badly in Israel. But oh, well. No one cares. People just stop replying when I mention it. Nothing to say. Only Jews matter in their mind, as it's really just Jewish supremacism, and even Gentiles buy into that crap at times.

 

[Koldo]

Good so you admit hamas is a terrorist group that lies and has no problem killing civilians. Glad we agree. Since all that's true Israel is justified in responding in kind to Hamas.

How did you reach this conclusion?
Because it truly makes no sense at all.

You are saying that since Hamas killed innocent civilians, which is a bad thing, Israel is then justified in doing the same bad thing.

 

[Kathryn]

No, you are your own secretary as if you claim facts, you give evidence. I am not your secretary and do it for you as to find it for you, even if you claim you have already posted it.
So do your job as it is yours and give evidence.

I agree that we should give sources for information but I only post it once as well.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

As I said, ANY source that misuses terms like this should be viewed with skepticism.

Why, do they make you nervous? Don't like to think about what you support? Poor baby.

 

[Kathryn]

I keep reminding people that Palestinian Christians have been murdered by the IDF, too, but it seems people care even less about them. Certainly the "Christians" on here don't give a damn about them. So their hatred of Muslims/Arabs outweighs their concern for other Christians. And it's not even just Palestinians. Christians in general are treated badly in Israel. But oh, well. No one cares. People just stop replying when I mention it. Nothing to say. Only Jews matter in their mind, as it's really just Jewish supremacism, and even Gentiles buy into that crap at times.

I guess it's a good thing that the percentage of Palestinian Christians has dropped so much. They account for less than 1 percent of the population of Gaza.

Palestinian Christians - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

I guess it's a good thing that the percentage of Palestinian Christians has dropped so much. They account for less than 1 percent of the population of Gaza.

Palestinian Christians - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

No, it's not a good thing and the number of them doesn't change a thing I said. It doesn't make Israels crimes against them mean less. Like I said, no one cares.

 

[Kathryn]

No, it's not a good thing and the number of them doesn't change a thing I said. It doesn't make Israels crimes against them mean less. Like I said, no one cares.

The fewer numbers, the fewer casualties. There are about 1000 Palestinian Christians living in Gaza.

Under Israeli attack: Who are the Christians of Gaza?

They’re small in number, but with deep roots that they are unwilling to leave behind.

www.aljazeera.com

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

I agree that we should give sources for information but I only post it once as well.

Well, then point out where you did it. If you make a positive claim, you have the burden of proof. It is the same for me, if I make a positive claim.

 

[icehorse]

Why, do they make you nervous? Don't like to think about what you support? Poor baby.

Because their premises are built on popular lies. I prefer arguments based on solid, logical, honest foundations.

 

[Kathryn]

Well, then point out where you did it. If you make a positive claim, you have the burden of proof. It is the same for me, if I make a positive claim.

No, sorry, I am not going to look through thread after thread. My point is that I do give sources nearly always but I generally only give them one time.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

No, sorry, I am not going to look through thread after thread. My point is that I do give sources nearly always but I generally only give them one time.

Then you give the evidence again, because I am not going through thread after thread for something, when you have the burden of proof. And nor would I demand that of you, if I had the burden of proof.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

Because their premises are built on popular lies. I prefer arguments based on solid, logical, honest foundations.

Uh huh. You just don't want to hear it.

 

[Kathryn]

Then you give the evidence again, because I am not going through thread after thread for something, when you have the burden of proof. And nor would I demand that of you, if I had the burden of proof.

Nope, sorry. One time, that should be sufficient.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

Because their premises are built on popular lies. I prefer arguments based on solid, logical, honest foundations.

You are then if you can actually do that, the first human in recorded history able to do so and so you are really special. Where have you published your system?

 

[icehorse]

Uh huh. You just don't want to hear it.

Oh I forgot, you're a mind reader!

 

[icehorse]

You are then if you can actually do that, the first human in recorded history able to do so and so you are really special. Where have you published your system?

strawman, and a weak one at that.