You know that painting of the Tower of Babel is from 1563 right? That is thousands of years after it was supposed to have been built. I guarantee you that is not what it looked like.
Apparently someone thinks irrelevant information, when the painting was made#1 and the guess that it didn't look like that, #2, whick make no difference in any logical way pertaining to the meaning behind the usage of it, is Winner! worthy.
Neither does when it was painted matter or what it hypothetically may have looked like if it existed at all.
What matters is what it means to use the Tower as a symbol for the EU and its agenda(s) that are the return to one world government like prior to Babel, immediately prior.
So if that makes your comment a winner I wonder what standards this person uses to determine what is an important comment?
It certainly is not accurate or important, the Tower is older than the painting and they didn't have to use that painting, could have made a new one if it mattered. It doesn't matter. It's symbolic, not an attempt to prove what it looked like. So whenever it was painted is irrelevant as is its actual appearance which is unknown.
What is relevant is usage itself, and what it means to those who are not naive and unaware, skeptical as anyone but not dismissive of obvious symbolism, Biblical symbolism used to announce the intentions of the EU its allies, and what they stand for, who they serve.
Naive people who think if they say conspiracy theory they look smart, which could be the case if talking about theories.
Not actual conspiracies which actually exist, I don't think they realize the difference because tptb have been making conspiracy and conspiracy theory, two different things, subliminally one and the same which effectively renders legitimate conspiracies into fodder for nutters.
I mean by definition if two people plan to do something it is conspiring, especially if they tell no one.
But evil conspiring and related shenanigans of the elite are what gets called conspiracy theory, fact or fiction.
And the naive need to know they are naive and stop thinking everything that they don't know is not true because they don't know, because they are not capable of understanding unless they are given hours of explanation of what some see with just their eyes and comprehend immediately because they have spent their time wisely by learning instead of criticizing everyone who just wants to share something fascinating. Because they don't get it, are naive enough to believe the world is run by nice people.
Or maybe they just are insecure about anything that escaped their attention even though it no longer does it is possible that people actually get embarrassed when they learn about something new, possibly and as equally ludacris, just BECAUSE they didn't know it.
They are always silenced in the end, after irrational arguments fail and logic prevails, they never acknowledge (in general) they were mistaken and just didn't understand. Usually they just vanish.