• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

GMOs

KMGC

Member
Is it just me or are atheists believing that as all was once one molecule that altered itself "naturally" there is no reason not to combine the DNA of other molecules.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Ouroboros

Coincidentia oppositorum
??? I'm not sure I follow. Can you expand on your post a little more?

Are you saying that all genetic engineers at Monsanto are atheists?
 

freethinker44

Well-Known Member
Is it just me or are atheists believing that as all was once one molecule that altered itself "naturally" there is no reason not to combine the DNA of other molecules.

Ok, so I know this is english because I recognize the words, but the way you arrange them, I have absolutely no clue what you are talking about.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

outhouse

Atheistically
Is it just me or are atheists believing that as all was once one molecule that altered itself "naturally" there is no reason not to combine the DNA of other molecules.


Science is not blasphemy, and you are no one to make such accusations :slap:


More GMO's please



Evolution is fact, and so far all we get are poor excuses from certain theist.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

idav

Being
Premium Member
If god didnt want us acting godlike then he should do the fix so we dont have scientists do it for us.
 

Alceste

Vagabond
Is it just me or are atheists believing that as all was once one molecule that altered itself "naturally" there is no reason not to combine the DNA of other molecules.

Says you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
??? I'm not sure I follow. Can you expand on your post a little more?

Are you saying that all genetic engineers at Monsanto are atheists?
No, I think he's saying they're all heretics... or maybe lunatics...
 

Simurgh

Atheist Triple Goddess
As of when has "blasphemy" become a scientific term, and how does it apply to DNA?

Have i been munching too much catnip of late, or are we getting on that slippery slope of inanity which usually leads to hilarity? In that case, yeah sure, sign me up for the next round of pseudo-arguments in the name of creationist debate--and i do use that term loosely.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
Is it just me or are atheists believing that as all was once one molecule that altered itself "naturally" there is no reason not to combine the DNA of other molecules.
It's just you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
Is it just me or are atheists believing that as all was once one molecule that altered itself "naturally" there is no reason not to combine the DNA of other molecules.

Thank you so much for that public-spirited announcement! I think I'll go back my regularly scheduled wanking now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Badran

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Thank you so much for that public-spirited announcement! I think I'll go back my regularly scheduled wanking now.

That was considerate of you, to cease your wanking in order to read the OP.

I didn't stop, myself.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
That was considerate of you, to cease your wanking in order to read the OP.

I didn't stop, myself.

I am deeply impressed with your ability to multi-task. Such talent has "CEO" written all over it.
 
Last edited:

The Neo Nerd

Well-Known Member
Is it just me or are atheists believing that as all was once one molecule that altered itself "naturally" there is no reason not to combine the DNA of other molecules.

Perhaps instead of telling atheists how they feel about GMOs, you should ask.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I'm late to this thread, but I think you've all missed the point of the OP.
It's really a metaphor for pushing the heretical notion that soft cheeses
are better than hard cheeses. This is, of course, ridiculous because all
the truly great cheeses require drying & aging.
 
Last edited:

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I'm late to this thread, but I think you've all missed the point of the OP.
It's really a metaphor for pushing the heretical notion that soft cheeses
are better than hard cheeses. This is, of course, ridiculous because all
the truly great cheeses require drying & aging.
Don't brie ridiculous.
 
Top