Dr. John Huber is a fraud, and most definitely not an expert on GMOs.
Dr. Huber turns down my generous offer « Biology Fortified, Inc.
Don Huber, controversial activist scientist promoting mysterious GMO superbug scare, has no data | Genetic Literacy Project
Erm, find a peer-reviewed paper on
what, exactly?
No, actually it isn't. All of those crops you eat are still artificially selected for, which is a form of genetic modification - or did you not know that GM doesn't just mean "grown in a lab"?
While you're at it, I heard not hopping up and down on on leg everywhere you go reduces your chance of child rearing as well, so you might as well do that just to be safe. It has just as much credibility as your claims thus far.
I will watch it when I have the chance, but frankly you are in no position to lecture me on what is "going on behind the scenes" considering you have provided me with nothing but links to crackpots, misinformation and flat-out garbage thus far. You've already demonstrated a concerning lack of understanding of what GMO food actually is.
Once again, John Huber is
not a "toxicology expert". Read the links I provided above.
It should be pretty obvious what peer reviewed papers I'm talking about, we're talking about GMOs.
If Don - and to clarify, his name is DON - Huber is not a toxicology expert who is?
No high up scientist in their right mind would accept an offer from a random audience member to examine and thusly potentially verify as false their work. It's like saying a pro wrestler would up and allow themselves to get in a fight with an audience member (not a paid actor) who could be hiding a weapon or anything like that.
The validity of the article you posted is questionable just by the format. Reminds me of dozens of other scams I've read. He's not a crackpot because he's against GMOs, and I'm presently of the opinion that due to your immature jokes and lack of ability to adequately represent your opinion without expressing childish jokes or attempts at deluding others by entering some sort of mob psychology prompt where because you joked about me they'll side with you instead, you may as well not post at all.
Just because he has a theory running where he has no peer-reviewed papers, doesn't make everything he has ever known useless. If you're going to present that he himself has no data with evidence that it's because there are no peer-reviewed papers... you only back up my argument that there is NO DATA on GMOs that is peer reviewed, and I'm QUITE certain that if that is even required, it has been peer reviewed. Furthermore, you state that he is NOT a toxicology expert, providing evidence that he has a theory which has not peer reviewed and that he rejected someones "generous offer." IN NO WAY does this prove that he is not a toxicology expert. It's enough for me to say you are just another among a massive number of hypocritical, convinced critics of pro-health pro-organic, anti-GMO people who just want to watch others play God. You provide ZERO evidence that is directly linked to your statements.
It is rare for me to not to buy food from an organic food store in which all the labels say NON-GMO, but I'm pretty broke of late. Are you suggesting that even those foods are GMO'd?
As well I am not female, despite your presumption, so I have more an issue with impotency. I was tempted to respond in kind, but have decided not to harass you with points that might not even apply to you, as you have done unto me.
Finally, on your statement that he is a crackpot, as derived from the two articles you shared, means nothing. Also, you suggest that wikipedia allows crackpots and misinformers to write on their site, which they likely do not, not that I make any definite claim. Everything I have read on there has come with perfect source material and a good deal of advanced research, unlike your google search for evidence against - Don - Huber, who you are calling a fraud for showing concern that a toxin that targets GROWING POINTS in it's victim is now being widely ingested - essentially- by the human race. It's no wonder animals are infertile.
I ask kindly that you re-read my posts, both of the last two, and not quickly scan over them and the articles you provide for OPINIONS instead of facts. Hell, while I'm at it, I'll clearly state... THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION IS A CRACKPOT THEORY WITH NO DERIVATIVES IN A REALITY IN WHICH A GOD EXISTS. IT DOESN'T MATTER HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE DELUDED BY THE ANCIENT SKULLS WE'VE DISCOVERED, THOSE COULD SIMPLY BE ANOTHER SPECIES THAT WENT EXTINCT. SO FAR WE'VE GOT BILLIONS OF BELIEVERS IN A HIGHER POWER IN GENERAL WITH LOADS OF WRITTEN (If no evidence available to the naked eye) EVIDENCE FOR IT, AND A FEW DEAD BODIES AS SUPPORT FOR EVOLUTION. Btw, this is coming from someone who used to be an evolutionist. I mean, do you really think we just coincidentally achieved multiple different bodies and forms, can reproduce, and THINK? SERIOUSLY... FOR YOU TO PRESUME THERE ISN'T A DIVINE BEING WHO CAUSED ALL THIS ALIGNMENT IS PLAIN RIDICULOUSNESS. THE CHANCES OF EVERYTHING ALIGNING SO PERFECTLY, EVEN IF AFTER MILLIONS AND EVEN BILLIONS OF YEARS, IS NIL.