KMGC
Member
You really don't seem to understand what my objection to what you did was, do you? It's really quite simple:
What you did:
Type in a key phrase designed to produce specific results that fit with your preconceptions and supported your view, despite showing no evidence whatsoever of having reviewed those links or checked them for any kind of validity, as evidenced by the fact that the first result was from a website that quoted itself as a source.
What I did:
Typed an individual's name into a search engine to find any links about their work, finding two articles which were particularly critical and showed that individual to be potentially dishonest, then present those articles to you. And, may I add, you have yet to refute a single thing presented in those articles.
You are wrong there. And you too have not done any adequate refuting on those articles, but posted simply that I was wrong and then posted two pages that supported that theory... You are a doubt-mongerer, where I appear to be a fearmongerer but am truly an advocate for the better of mankind.