Smoke
Done here.
:d :d :dit's like trying to compare star trek to star wars; two completely different things.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
:d :d :dit's like trying to compare star trek to star wars; two completely different things.
I don't think so.Should God be compared to humans or humanity in any way? If so, why should God be compared, and in what regards should God be compared to humans or humanity?
Friend rojse,
Who is this *god* anyway?
Lets clarify the basis of your query before going further.
Love & rgds
Human behavior is not a GOD trait but there is much to be said (and understood) about how humans conduct their relationship with GOD.Should God be compared to humans or humanity in any way? If so, why should God be compared, and in what regards should God be compared to humans or humanity?
Whomever or whatever the poster considers to be God will be sufficient for this discussion.
Absolutely (which is also, incidentally, relatively).Should God be compared to humans or humanity in any way?
Because we're human --humans talking to humans about a human concept. In what regard? Every Way.If so, why should God be compared, and in what regards should God be compared to humans or humanity?
Identical twins are the mirror image of one another
Absolutely (which is also, incidentally, relatively).
Because we're human --humans talking to humans about a human concept. In what regard? Every Way.
Should God be compared to humans or humanity in any way? If so, why should God be compared, and in what regards should God be compared to humans or humanity?
Comparing is easy. I can compare a boat with a ship, I can compare a tree with a bush, I can compare an orange with an apple (Yeah people, it's possible).
What about chalk and cheese?
Chalk is like cheese, only cheese's substance is somewhat different.
Cheese is mostly more yellow although some goatcheese resemble the color of the standard white chalk perfectly.
Both are eatible, but chalk might not be as good for your body. MOstly chalk is shaped differently then cheese. Although people sometime take a piece of cheese and it resembles the shape better.
Yeah? Well...
Well... what about chalk and oranges?
In my theology, some comparison is reasonable. Since we are aspects of God, we can possess no trait that God does not. We can therefore conclude that God is sapient and has emotions, for example.Should God be compared to humans or humanity in any way? If so, why should God be compared, and in what regards should God be compared to humans or humanity?
In my theology, some comparison is reasonable. Since we are aspects of God, we can possess no trait that God does not. We can therefore conclude that God is sapient and has emotions, for example.
"Since we are aspects of God, we can possess no trait that God does not." It helps to read the whole post. Also, I've said many times that I reject the supernatural.I don't really think this makes much sense, why would there be any correlation at all between homo sapiens and a supernatural god?
You are assuming that we are spirits (and you're right), but that we are clothed in flesh. Right there you have hit the nail on the head without even realizing it. God is also spirit. If being spirit does not preclude us from having a physical form, why would it preclude God from having a physical form? "Pneuma" (Greek) = spirit = life. We have a spirit like God's. We are also created in His image.There is an assumption being made here ... that the human words (rooted in human thoughts) somehow represent absolute truth ... I wonder about that.
If we take scripture as that truth then we are led to know that God is Spirit and (I think) we are created in "His" image, it must be that it is our spirit, not our physical/human-beingness, that is in the image of God/Spirit. Therefore, it would seem that, in spite of what our LDS friends believe, there is no comparision except on the spiritual level.
Yeah, I know. I was just using the common idiom. To most people looking at them, they look alike. That's all I was saying.This has got nothing to do with the question at hand, but just as a peice of info - identical twins are not mirror images of each other. There are twins which are mirror images but they are not identical. Remember the image you see in the mirror is different....one will be left handed, one will be right etc etc. Another peice of usesless info - thats where scientists think you get left handed people from..they were initially mirror twins, but the second twin was "reabsorbed" into the body - the body has a habit of doing that (before we even know about it).