Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It seems he was supporting a subjective approach to theism.
What characterizes a "subjective approach" to theism? I'm not quite clear on what you mean by that.
Our conception of a thing (or phenomena, or whatever) is not the thing, itself. It's just our way of perceiving/conceiving of it from what little of it we have managed to comprehend. But good luck trying to get most people to recognize and understand the difference."God is not the name of God, but an opinion about Him." The quote is often attributed to Pope Sixtus I, but it is more likely to have been said by an anonymous Pythagorean philosopher.
What, if anything, does the quote mean to you? How do you interpret it?
"God is not the name of God, but an opinion about Him." The quote is often attributed to Pope Sixtus I, but it is more likely to have been said by an anonymous Pythagorean philosopher.
What, if anything, does the quote mean to you? How do you interpret it?
"Immutable essence"Our conception of a thing (or phenomena, or whatever) is not the thing, itself. It's just our way of perceiving/conceiving of it from what little of it we have managed to comprehend. But good luck trying to get most people to recognize and understand the difference.
That your opinion of God takes greater authority than His name when it comes to determining His character. That God is who you believe Him to be.
Do you think that's true?
"God is not the name of God, but an opinion about Him." The quote is often attributed to Pope Sixtus I, but it is more likely to have been said by an anonymous Pythagorean philosopher.
What, if anything, does the quote mean to you? How do you interpret it?
It depends a great deal upon one's religion.Well, it's true. No god that I can think of was named God. A god is any one or anything that is considered mighty or is venerated. It's that simple. So, being a God is dependent upon the worshiper. If no one worshiped Jehovah then Jehovah would be no one's god.
It depends a great deal upon one's religion.
I know many Christians who call their god by the name of "God".
Clearly, some have names other than or in addition to "God".I don't agree. Like I said, I don't know of any god of any religion that goes by the name of God. The God of the Christians is Jehovah, though most don't know this. He is called God, as he is God, the one God above all other gods. Much of the confusion in that particular case has to do with the Scribes removing God's name and replacing it with the generic term LORD.
Clearly, some have names other than or in addition "God".
But if some name their god "God", then I accept this name.
Whether they're right or wrong would be for their god to say,
not for mere mortals.
"God is not the name of God, but an opinion about Him." The quote is often attributed to Pope Sixtus I, but it is more likely to have been said by an anonymous Pythagorean philosopher.
What, if anything, does the quote mean to you? How do you interpret it?
It would be up to the person applying the name whether it's the proper name or a title.Okay. But, hypothetically, what if a king who's name was David and sometimes they called him King? Is that a name? King? The Christians, for example, have a Lord, Jesus Christ. Sometimes they call him Lord. That isn't his name though, just as Christ isn't his name. These are descriptive titles.
It would be up to the person applying the name whether it's the proper name or a title.