GOP civil war

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Basically you agree with all the violations that the Joe Biden and the Democrats are making against the civil and constitutional rights of citizens. You agree with their weaponizing Federal agencies against the populace, demagoguery of dissenters, and their corruption.

Well, you've made the claim -- "violations that the Joe Biden and the Democrats are making against the civil and constitutional rights of citizens {...} weaponizing Federal agencies against the populace, demagoguery of dissenters, and their corruption."

Now present those "violations, weaponizations, demagoguery against dissenters, and corruption." If you know about them, as you seem to claim, you should find it easy to lay them out for all of us to see.

 

[Shaul]

Well, you've made the claim -- "violations that the Joe Biden and the Democrats are making against the civil and constitutional rights of citizens {...} weaponizing Federal agencies against the populace, demagoguery of dissenters, and their corruption."

Now present those "violations, weaponizations, demagoguery against dissenters, and corruption." If you know about them, as you seem to claim, you should find it easy to lay them out for all of us to see.

Don't need to. I was pointing out that he would agree with any such violations that Joe Biden and the Democrats made regardless of which ones they are.

 

[Shaul]

What civil and constitutional rights of citizens were violated by the Jan. 6th committee? The Jan. 6th folks who were prosecuted were not "dissenters." breaking into Congresspeople's offices crosses a teeny bit further than that.

Any other silly excuses you wanna throw out?

Try reading with additional comprehension. I didn't limit the violations for only ones they may or may not have made using the January 6th Committee.

 

[Revoltingest]

As you would be, if you had to listen endlessly to the likes of Marjorie Taylor Green and Matt Gaetz.

I would probably have to commit seppuku!

But you'd never drink the Kool-Aid in the first place.

 

[Left Coast]

Try reading with additional comprehension. I didn't limit the violations for only ones they may or may not have made using the January 6th Committee.

Okay so you have no answer to the question I actually asked lol, which is actually relevant to the existence of the committee. Just say that next time.

 

[Shaul]

Okay so you have no answer to the question I actually asked lol, which is actually relevant to the existence of the committee. Just say that next time.

I did answer. You just didn't like it.

 

[Left Coast]

I did answer. You just didn't like it.

I don't like silly non sequiturs.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Don't need to. I was pointing out that he would agree with any such violations that Joe Biden and the Democrats made regardless of which ones they are.

Ah, the usual (and expected) cop-out.

 

[metis]

Both Cheney and Kinzinger chose to knowingly violate the stated position of the Republican Party that it would not participate. This means that they were NOT acting as Republicans on the Committee but as individual. There was not Republican participation on the Committee.

So, a politician should always support the party versus the country if they conflict? Yep, that very much seems as your m.o. as we've repeatedly seen.