Hypothetically.....If the cops were complicit then then yes. I saw a protest not an insurrection.
If President tried to over-turn an election,
what would your opinion of this be?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Hypothetically.....If the cops were complicit then then yes. I saw a protest not an insurrection.
And how, exactly, do you think the Biden campaign managed to usurp the power of the Government? Donald Trump was President in 2020 -- right to the last day and beyond -- and all departments reported to his cabinet.The main problem; lefty tactic, is this topic is not using the full context. What we now known, is the Biden Campaign, in 2020, used the power of Government; FBI, to censor Conservatives and Trump via social media. Their crime was against the first Amendment. We did not know that back then. Nor did we known the full extent and Trump could not fully prove it. Control of fake news and control of social media was not allowing the truth to be known, since the censorship was in full effect. It was organized crime under our noses.
We're it only true!Fix that "1920".
Yours is a dismal imagination, indeed. Either way, I appreciate your concern. What you fear will not come to pass. I will be OK.I hope the day never comes, but I can just imagine you one day: your feet amputated because of untreated diabetes, no wheelchair because you have no cash and a mountain of debt from the surgery, unable to work or even leave your house, trapped in what is effectively solitary confinement, imagining that you're "free."
I didn't say "universal healthcare," I said "free" universal healthcare.Universal healthcare is completely consistent with freedom to those of us who approach the issue rationally.
Society pays for health care one way or another, either directly or by absorbing medical bankruptcies. I think saving people's lives is better than letting them die bankrupt.Yours is a dismal imagination, indeed. Either way, I appreciate your concern. What you fear will not come to pass. I will be OK.
I didn't say "universal healthcare," I said "free" universal healthcare.
Compulsion is moral?Society pays for health care one way or another, either directly or by absorbing medical bankruptcies. I think saving people's lives is better than letting them die bankrupt.
I didn't say "universal healthcare," I said "free" universal healthcare.
Compulsion is moral?
Do I have a natural right to their services?There's compulsion in a private company saying "pay us $______ for your healthcare or we'll just let you die."
Their freedom to refuse their services is what creates the coercion and compulsion. It's an example of a market failure.Do I have a natural right to their services?
Nothing is ever "free," but like any other kind of necessity, it can be paid for either through premiums (insurance) or taxes. Most people would be financially ruined being responsible in a personal injury car accident -- but by buying insurance, we all protect ourselves. Everybody pays a little more so that nobody is ruined.Yours is a dismal imagination, indeed. Either way, I appreciate your concern. What you fear will not come to pass. I will be OK.
I didn't say "universal healthcare," I said "free" universal healthcare.
One question: how do Americans think they will get free universal healthcare?
By virtue of the Holy Spirit?
They should rise up...and the army should side with them, because they deserve free healthcare too.
Oh...I forgot...they are content with the thirty pieces of silver the Government gives them.
Freedom to require payment for services creates coercion?Their freedom to refuse their services is what creates the coercion and compulsion. It's an example of a market failure.
Freedom to require payment for services creates coercion?
There's that broad brush again. You just love wielding it, don't you?LoL! "SUDENLY" the Left is concerned about cops being assaulted!
I mean... they have to pay for their insurance too...Of the friends and family members I have who are military or former military, very few of them seemed to have any kind of "revolutionary" inkling. And even those who did would still follow their orders and uphold their oath to the Constitution. But a close friend of mine (who was a CB in Vietnam) did believe that revolution would be theoretically justified if the government ran afoul of the Constitution.
So medical providers are threatening people that if they don't buy their services, they'll kill them?The choice between payment and death creates coercion.
If someone held a gun to your head and told you that if you don't buy their widget for $100,000 they're going to kill you, would you be making a free decision when you hand over the money?
I mean... they have to pay for their insurance too...
if there were free universal healthcare like in Britain, they would save lots of money, I think.
So medical providers are threatening people that if they don't buy their services, they'll kill them?
A more equivalent analogy seems necessary here. One, at least, that doesn't implicate medical providers as being responsible for a person's being on the verge of death.
There may be, I don't care to find any; I only know what went on in my City; which a crowd ascended on a police station, boarded up all the doors and windows, and attempted to set the whole building on fire with cops inside. Of everybody involved with this, only 1 person served time SPD: Rioters tried to trap officers inside burning precinct using rebar and concreteNo statistics on this?
Insurrection AND Coup? Both the BLM riots and the Jan 06 riot were both insurrections (insurrection being an uprising against Governmental authority) But neither were a coup attempt.Insurrection & coups pose great dangers
to all, & should see vigorous prosecution.
More so than violence that doesn't have
existential consequences for government.
Oh Stop trying to make this out to be more than it was. There was no attempt to take over the Government; they were practically unarmed and had no plan, and once they actually took over the capital building, what did they do? They wondered the halls, took a few selfies, and after less than 2 hours everybody left without further incident. If this were a coup, if this were an attempt to take over the government, they would have arrived armed to do battle with police, secured positions, provided a list of demands, and would have had to be overpowered by superior force. The only thing these fools wanted to do was to temporarily disrupt the election process, once they did that they were done, and they left allowing the election process to continue. Quit trying to make a mountain out of this mole hill.I said that it wasn't, but the risk it posed
was far far greater. This wasn't just about
the violence & destruction. They tried to
take over government to install their
prophet who lost the election.
Their prison sentences should be severe.