• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Happy International Blasphemy Day!

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Because you thought him more peaceable than the people who engineered a peace agreement with Iran.
And you prefered the one who threatened to "obliterate Iran".
She said this before the election.
Something he did after the election...not something I could've taken into consideration.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
No she didn't.
I watched the video.

She said we could if they attacked us. You've been called on this BS before, but you keep saying it kiltboy.
Tom
You're not accurately representing what she said.
If you were, you'd offer evidence.
But her record in Congress speaks for itself.
She voted to start & continue devastating, debilitating, useless wars.
Your approval of her is approval for this history & its portent.
I've called you on this BS, but you remain committed ignoring it.

Wouldn't it be more reasonable if you recognized that both candidates
had problems regarding peace seeking, & that we might weigh their
pluses & minuses differently? You see only troubles under Trump's
reign, & don't recognize that there'd be troubles under Hillary's too.
But since she lost the election, the effect is that she has a perfect
record in comparison....the grass is always greener under the option
not realized.

Caution:
The above post is in the spirit of tit for tat.
When discussing things with civil posters, I'm much more charitable.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
You're not accurately representing what she said.
If you were, you'd offer evidence.
Anyone can google what she said. It's easy to find.

She didn't threaten to obliterate Iran out of bloodlust like you have opined. She pointed out that we could, if necessary, obliterate Iran.
To a bunch of people who were opposed to any peace deal with Iran. Like your boy Trump.

He said before the election that he would restart conflict, with everybody from Iran to China to Mexico.

And you voted for him and he has.
Hope you think your tax cuts were worth it.
Tom
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Anyone can google what she said. It's easy to find.
And yet....you didn't.

Lookie here....
There's no point re-living the campaign, with Trump's actual record
in office being compared to Hillary's non-existent one. We each
voted based upon what we knew at the time.
Accept it......move on....get over her loss... recover from TDS....quit
whining about his being in office.
Deal with the issue at hand, ie, blasphemy.
 
Last edited:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
When you don't live in a democracy, losing the Presidency to the old white rich dude who knows how to play a rigged system doesn't mean the same thing it would if the votes mattered.
Tom
Oh, you poor fellow semi-rich white dude....crying
that it's a conspiracy in a totalitarian state. Twas
your ilk who sabotaged Bernie's run for office.
We had an election under the existing rules, & your
gal lost fair & square. It's still democratic, even when
it doesn't go your way.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
But staff perceptions rule here on RF.
From the rules....

"Most people" appears to be functionally defined as two or more really loud complainants.
And this criterion varies with who is being offended.
I've already said enuf to get a wedgie from a mod.
Let's just be careful, folks.

latest


Couldn't find Willie, sorry...I tried, at least!
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Dear RFers, I find myself with a problem.
Can I ding @columbus and @Revoltingest for starting semi-serious political sparring in a joke thread reserved for blasphemy, on a site promoting civil religious discourse?
I've scoured the rules, but there is actually nothing there saying 'thou must blaspheme hilariously'. Disappointing, I know.

So I'll limit myself to the less formal route of corrective action.

Stop being poopyheads, and make with the funny.

Disclaimer : This post was intended humour, and any failure on this posts part to actually be humorous cannot be rendered as intentional. For any complaints about the quality or humour content of this post, please message @4consideration , who was my mentor when I first joined the mod squad, and therefore has a serious amount to answer for. Hopefully in a completely non-serious way.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
My song has a framework and foundation, and a chorus in progress. Where I'm at now, I was just judged, but not judged to torment because I wasn't able to snatch my own self from the hand of Christ (John 10:28), and these mother ****ers are letting me in. I'm confused and perplexed, because once I was saved I'm always saved.
The next part is a "call to war," the next part of the gory scene that becomes Heaven, with the final part being that the Lord of Lords is overthrown, cast out, and other stuff I can't say here. For sky will be read from the Mansions being on fire, the hordes of demons will ruin the streets of gold - streets that will be lined with the impaled bodies of angels. And after Heaven has been sacked (meaning this won't be shared in "safe zones/watch the trigger warnings places"), Lucifer shall sat upon the throne with me at his Left Hand.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Dear RFers, I find myself with a problem.
Can I ding @columbus and @Revoltingest for starting semi-serious political sparring in a joke thread reserved for blasphemy, on a site promoting civil religious discourse?
I've scoured the rules, but there is actually nothing there saying 'thou must blaspheme hilariously'. Disappointing, I know.

So I'll limit myself to the less formal route of corrective action.

Stop being poopyheads, and make with the funny.

Disclaimer : This post was intended humour, and any failure on this posts part to actually be humorous cannot be rendered as intentional. For any complaints about the quality or humour content of this post, please message @4consideration , who was my mentor when I first joined the mod squad, and therefore has a serious amount to answer for. Hopefully in a completely non-serious way.
I am deeply touched that we little folk have been acknowledged
for creating the Nomad Scenario among staff.

Btw, you get brownie points for noticing the "semi".
 
Last edited:
Top