I'd rather the nomination be based upon more
important criteria than race & gender.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Harris On The Supreme Court? Bad Idea!
- Thread starter Revoltingest
- Start date
important criteria than race & gender.
anna.
colors your eyes with what's not there
Why so cryptic? It's not helpful.
Audie
Veteran Member
I don't know all the people speculating.
Do you have anything of substance to contribute
regarding the kind of nominee...prosecutor or
defense attorney?
Last edited:
Are you sure?
Both seem to be scoring low points with the public.
I don't think so.
I don't even know if these speculations are cromulent.
Audie
Veteran Member
Something about who you find repugnant
anna.
colors your eyes with what's not there
Fox News Wildly Speculates That Biden Will Name Kamala Harris to Supreme Court
...At the same time, the Fox host eventually admitted this was all just unfounded punditry not backed up by any reporting.
...At the same time, the Fox host eventually admitted this was all just unfounded punditry not backed up by any reporting.
Actually most of the public don't even [email protected].
Audie
Veteran Member
Ha. I must of meant downstaging
anna.
colors your eyes with what's not there
Not gonna do this again. Not interested in trying to decode you.
Audie
Veteran Member
I doubt anyone else is befuddled
I understand you.
But then I know a little Beijing hua...about as much
as an uneducated toddler...perhaps a little less.
anna.
colors your eyes with what's not there
I just did. This was floated by RW news talking heads, not based on any fact per Faulkner's admission. This was floated on Fox by Harris Faulkner and Kayleigh McEnany, and amplified by Murdoch's (also Chairman of Fox + 39% ownership) New York Post. It is, at this time, baseless RW speculation, nothing more.
Last edited:
You're merely objecting to the source of speculation.
Do you have any thoughts about what kind of justice
should be nominated?
anna.
colors your eyes with what's not there
I'm responding to the OP re: Kamala Harris. Isn't that the idea?
Audie
Veteran Member
Thats about as much of those beijing
lingos as i knows
Shadow Wolf
Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
There's effectively a 0% chance of it even happening so how did this become a topic?
Do you have any opinion about nominating a potential
justice from a criminal defense vs prosecutorial background?
Let's hear something more than complaints about he right.
anna.
colors your eyes with what's not there
Your OP wasn't "Who do you think Biden should appoint to the Supreme Court? Your OP said "speculation ramps up" and I'm pointing out it's being ramped up by the right without any basis in fact. It's good to understand that Murdoch is amplifying Murdoch in the OP link.
Do you have any opinion...any thoughts at all about
the theme that I'm telling you I have, which is about
the problem of no criminal defense attorneys on the
court?