• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Hillary used to pal around with KKK members... ohh, I mean "ex-KKK"

Mindmaster

Mindmaster

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
This isn't exactly the same as being "supported" by some random racist, this is going in for the tongue!

http://www.snopes.com/clinton-byrd-photo-klan/

Screenshot-2016-03-02-at-12.03.25-PM.png
 
Revoltingest

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Rowan said:
Not defending Hillary but surely you can't be so indoctrinated to think this is better then the KKK wizards everywhere endorsing Trump.
Pure Ideology.
Click to expand...
Not so fas there, Bubulah......
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles...-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president
Hillary Clinton can add a new name to her list of endorsements – a prominent Ku Klux Klan member who says he likes her because of her "hidden agenda."
Will Quigg, a grand dragon of the Ku Klux Klan's California chapter, told theTelegraph Monday that he would be switching his support from Donald Trump to Clinton.
Quigg had endorsed Trump on Twitter in September:
Click to expand...
Gawd, this election is fun, albeit scary too.
 
Last edited:
Mindmaster

Mindmaster

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Rowan said:
Not defending Hillary but surely you can't be so indoctrinated to think this is better then the KKK wizards everywhere endorsing Trump.
Pure Ideology.
Click to expand...

It's not that Trump is being endorsed by the KKK that is the problem -- he has no choice who votes for him. It's when the politician is involved in getting the former-KKK member elected for office and grooming him that there is a problem. She's about 100% more racist than Trump with this move. She didn't just get his support she helped him get elected. Whole different thing, so... No idea what you are on about.
 
Mindmaster

Mindmaster

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Revoltingest said:
You're very very welcome.
It points out the danger of criticisms which can apply to one's own.
Click to expand...

The issue never bothered me personally. You don't get to pick who votes for you, and who votes for you says nothing of you personally. Anyone inferring that is just completely illogical in the first place.
 
fantome profane

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
Mindmaster

Mindmaster

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Rowan said:
No, but he can change who he appeals to based on how he presents himself and his policy.



:facepalm:
Click to expand...

He can decide that group doesn't represent isn't important enough to bother with curtailing his message to others. Personally, white supremacists are a minority group and statistically irrelevant. I wouldn't change my ideas based on them either. His Mexico ideas aren't about race, they are about protecting jobs for our poorer people and bandaging a hemorrhaging wound.
 
Mindmaster

Mindmaster

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
fantome profane said:
I would like to think that you are too smart to fall for such a stupid trick. This guy does not really support Hillary, he is just saying this because he thinks it will undermine her campaign. He is a Trump supporter any you know that.
Click to expand...

It still doesn't matter, again you have no choice of who supports you. Hillary supported a racist, and it's all about Trump still? lol

Leftist echo chamber, blah.
 
Mindmaster

Mindmaster

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Rowan said:
Sometimes I wonder if your account on RF is just an elaborate troll.
Leftist? Hillary?

Capitalist... Check
Imperialist... Check
Nationalist... Check
Very leftist/10
Click to expand...

Actually, she has no position whatsoever. She's just a sock puppet anyway. :) She will go left to keep Bernie supporters or she will lose by default.
 
Revoltingest

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Mindmaster said:
The issue never bothered me personally. You don't get to pick who votes for you, and who votes for you says nothing of you personally. Anyone inferring that is just completely illogical in the first place.
Click to expand...
I agree.
It's always been a criticism that this Nazi or that skinhead supports us Libbies.
Instead of being shameful, I find it encouraging that perhaps they're learning to live & let live.
 
Mindmaster

Mindmaster

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
suncowiam said:
Seriously, everything that comes from you should have an (*) after it.

We know you endorse Trump. We get it. Why don't you add this to your signature so we know how biased you are in these discussions.
Click to expand...

I'm not, actually between Bernie or Trump I'd have to think about how much I dislike Bernie's Syrian refugee stance, as it is the major sticking point for me. With Hillary it's easy, I don't even have to think because I'm choking down my vomit. She's a snake, not worthy of the office, lies too damn much, and doesn't even have a single ounce of conviction. Independents just don't have realistic chances, so I don't vote for them. (I am aware that logic doesn't help them, but hey I decide if my vote is wasted. :)) Hillary never actually speaks on issues about Trump she just throws out slogans and promises bribes. She doesn't even explain how she plans to do what she says. At least, Trump seems to have a set of goals -- she's more like, hmm... you want that, ok? It's just reactionary, and whatever isn't reactionary is just Obama 2.0. These are legitimate criticisms, not biases.

I see absolutely no negatives in Trump's platform so it's better to not sulk over crushed dreams of Bernie or whatever. Again, Trump vs Bernie is a real race. I have nothing to think about with Trump vs Clinton.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top