• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

homosexuality disproves evolution

Autodidact

Intentionally Blank
homosexuality is not natural it leads to exstinction becuase homo can not pro create they die out. natural selection does not support 'homosexuality' according to natural selection gays will die out. evolutionists have been stumped there is nothing natural about gays.

Female homosexuality is beneficial to the individual homosexual and to the species. Would you like me to explain how?
 

Autodidact

Intentionally Blank
Although the OP clearly knows little about evolution and probably less about homosexuality, it does hit on an interesting paradox. How could homosexuality, which clearly makes an individual less likely to reproduce, possibly be genetic? I think it's an interesting question. I've given it a lot of thought, and I have some ideas.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Examples are everywhere.
How do wolves survive when only one couple in the pack breeds?
 

David M

Well-Known Member
Although the OP clearly knows little about evolution and probably less about homosexuality, it does hit on an interesting paradox. How could homosexuality, which clearly makes an individual less likely to reproduce, possibly be genetic? I think it's an interesting question. I've given it a lot of thought, and I have some ideas.

One of the more obvious reasons could be that unless the majority of the genes (in the plural because I'm betting any genetic component is polyphyletic) associated with homosexuality are homozygous for an individual the result is beneficial.
 

Alceste

Vagabond
I am very new here and will have to confess my ignorance and give in to my curiosity on this one, what does "a poe" mean?
Ive seen it used many times on this site, I assume it carries the same mean as troll does on YouTube, just wondered about its origins and if the p-o and e were an acronym of some kind.

"Poe's Law points out that it is hard to tell parodies of fundamentalism (or, more generally, any crackpot theory) from the real thing, since they both seem equally insane. Conversely, real fundamentalism can easily be mistaken for a parody of fundamentalism. For example, some conservatives consider noted homophobe Fred Phelps to be so over-the-top that they argue he's a "deep cover liberal" trying to discredit more mainstream homophobes."

Poe's Law - RationalWiki

:)
 

Big_TJ

Active Member
homosexuality is not natural it leads to exstinction becuase homo can not pro create they die out. natural selection does not support 'homosexuality' according to natural selection gays will die out. evolutionists have been stumped there is nothing natural about gays.

Welcome to RF.

You started badly though, since your post makes no sense. So, if i understand you, having protected sex will cause hetrosexual to die out - since there is no procreation there?

your post is sooo silly:facepalm:
 

McBell

Unbound
fantôme profane;2343709 said:
As individuals we are all doomed to “extinction”. It is kind of a side effect of being born.
[sarcasm]
Well, if evolution was true then we would have found a cure for that by now.
[/sarcasm]
 

doppelganger

Through the Looking Glass
"Poe's Law points out that it is hard to tell parodies of fundamentalism (or, more generally, any crackpot theory) from the real thing, since they both seem equally insane.
This seems to be the case with most mainstream political thought, though especially what is fed to the masses in the modern "conservative" movement. That's Stephen Colbert's whole act, which for a while was regularly mistakenly thought to not be an act by a lot of would-be "conservatives."
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
homosexuality is not natural it leads to exstinction becuase homo can not pro create they die out. natural selection does not support 'homosexuality' according to natural selection gays will die out. evolutionists have been stumped there is nothing natural about gays.

Welp, I'm convinced!

Down with Darwin!
 

Firepac

New Member
homosexuality is not natural it leads to exstinction becuase homo can not pro create they die out. natural selection does not support 'homosexuality' according to natural selection gays will die out. evolutionists have been stumped there is nothing natural about gays.

Then how come "homos" haven't caused the extinction of the human race yet? They've been around for thousands of years - in fact for as long as humanity. Homosexuals in no way leads to extinctions.
 

Autodidact

Intentionally Blank
Your arguement is disproved due to mutations. Natural has mutates and if the natural evolution is geared to continuance as is proved by time then the obvious conclusion is that all you homos out there are a perversion of the natural.

Could you repeat this in English? Thanks.
 

waitasec

Veteran Member
Well, here it is in plain english, in the scope of faith according to what is read to us, according to our belief as believers, according to us as men, as according to us as men of God, we do not do those things that are considered as filthy. We with a faith in God do not plant our seed in the excrement of another man.

I hope there is English enough for ya'll ??

why would you think god really cares where you plant your seed?
is god that insecure that god would be so concerned about sexuality as you are?
 
Top