When I heard the name Ridley Scott I already knew it would be a good movie
But I could have never imagined that good.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Sweatshop produced goods that are extremely overpriced due to brand hype for the affluent to squander undue wealth upon? Neat.
And these are the disgusting humans you wish to place upon a pedestal?I recall the interview with Patrizia when she still was in jail.
She talked about her love for money all the time.
She mentioned 2 billion Lire (1 million $ at that time) as if it was nothing to her. Worthless...
Of course not. I am just interested in people's psychology.And these are the disgusting humans you wish to place upon a pedestal?
Spoiled, sociopathic, narcissistic, entitled, shallow, materialistic... beyond that probably not much to delve into.Of course not. I am just interested in people's psychology.
Spoiled, sociopathic, narcissistic, entitled, shallow, materialistic... beyond that probably not much to delve into.
Do you believe that? Does that make sense to you?Better to cry in a Rolls- Royce than being happy on a bicycle.
No...it's scary.Do you believe that? Does that make sense to you?
It's very interesting to study these subjects.
Her class in saying incredibly cynical things is unique. She did say those things classily.
One of her most famous phrases :
Better to cry in a Rolls- Royce than being happy on a bicycle.
When I heard the name Ridley Scott I already knew it would be a good movie
But I could have never imagined that good.
I never could understand the fascination or obsession had with the "fashion world." My mother was really into that stuff, along with the celebrity gossip - as if it was somehow the most important thing in the world. She lived most of her life in West L.A., and a lot of people around there were really into the whole "fashion" thing. Hollywood glamor, glitz, and glitter. Gucci was pretty popular, but it didn't mean a thing to me.
The whole thing was so false, so phony, so fake - or "plastic" as some people might call it, even while there were people going around who were "into their consciousness" and still had some of that post-hippie pseudo-"spiritualism" which would ultimately be superseded by bourgeois consumerism and an escalated version of "keeping up with the Joneses."
I may still watch the film; it might be interesting. It might be like the line from Steely Dan's "Show Biz Kids": Show business kids making movies of themselves, you know they don't give a **** about anybody else...
You're paying for status, not quality.Meh. I may watch it. I'm not a fan of Gucci. Only bought one Gucci product ages ago. A purse. It couldn't handle my little regions climate so it fell apart soon after. Left a bad impression.
I don't buy stuff like Gucci. I pay for quality first. Then I make it look fashionable after. I don't care about status either. What status?You're paying for status, not quality.
You'll have ask those who sink $200 on an otherwise $20 item just because of the label.I don't buy stuff like Gucci. I pay for quality first. Then I make it look fashionable after. I don't care about status either. What status?
That's a good point.You'll have ask those who sink $200 on an otherwise $20 item just because of the label.