Its hard to keep up Carlita. You have a spring in your step. Hope yesterday was good for you.
I don't understand how truth can't be someone's reality. It does say truth has to do with facts. Why would I believe something if it weren't a fact?
Truth relates to facts.
Many of our beliefs may actually be unquestioned assumptions we have about ourselves, people, and our culture.
Was it Socrates that said the unexamined life is not worth living?
I wish I could go through all 45 pages. The conversation is good but I don't know if you guys will read everything.
I've been reading and thinking about what you are saying. How well I do that is another story.
1. Are you guys saying you want to make a new world without dogma so that all religions are in union among diversity?
That sounds a little mixed up so the answer would have to be 'No'.
We wish to work towards a more peaceful world. We believe this peace is attainable. A significant barrier to peace is religious dogma and rhetoric. Currently we have many adherents of the two main Abrahamic faiths promoting misinformation about the other to arouse ill feeling towards the other. The presumed superiority that adherents of each faith based their beliefs on are false dogmas and beliefs.
Lets examine the Christian position:
(1) There is only one way to God and that is through Jesus.
(2) Jesus is the only true religion and all the others are false.
How can that be?
(a) Because Jesus is God in the flesh.
(b) Jesus physically rose from the dead.
(c) Jesus said He is the way, the truth, the light and nobody goes to the father except me.
Are these beliefs true? Do they assist towards better interfaith dialogue or understanding?
If so, why not get their permission and agreement first?
I think I've answered that above.
2. You guys refer to Bahaullah a lot. Do you understand that unity has no founder? If you don't care for dogma, exnay Bahuaullah's teachings and come to find peace without dogma, if that is your goal.
I have to go to class... but I was going to go through the thread but I dont know if you guys are reading my posts. Adrian, maybe you but dont know about loverofhumanity.
Unity does have a founder and that is each one of us. Are we contributing to a better more peaceful world or are we contributing to misunderstanding and intolerance?
Are we part of the solution or part of the problem?
If our religion assists us to better contribute positively then it makes sense to embrace it. If our religion results in discord and disunity then better to be without it.
How do you separate belief from truth?
Just because you believe in something doesn't make it true? Why do you believe in it if it may not make it true?
Each person's truth contradict because they are unique and individual unto that person. That is why there are many truths. When you make them one, they contradict. That's my point in understanding Bahaullah's purpose. When you make all religions with a common foundation, you take away those truths and then religions contradict each other.
Interfaith is discussing each other's truth. I think we call it beliefs to be politically correct, but I honestly don't feel people would just believe something if they know for a fact what they believe is true. Most religious state their beliefs as facts as a result. Many pagans and maybe just you or Bahai in general don't. It's confusing.
We're not trying to squeeze all the religions into the Baha'i mould. Rather we are fostering an essential spiritual process creating a more unified and peaceful world.
If a person's belief is racist and supremacist around his own kind, can we call that 'truth'. Likewise when a person believes his nation is the only nation that matters.
You can disagree with the Baha'i perspective on different religions but it has to be acknowledged the Baha'i view is very positive about those religions and the contributions they have made to humanity.
Since it comes from the person's perspective, the truth is individual and personal. Since we have many people in the world, we have many truths. I don't like calling what I know is true as beliefs because that's discrediting what I experience just as knowing the earth goes around the sun.
If those beliefs are racist or sexist I prefer to call those beliefs prejudice rather than truth.
If those beliefs promote one country only to the detriment of others I call this nationalism rather than truth.
At some point we need to draw a line in the sand and distinguish truth from falsehood, right from wrong.
It's literal.
When you take the wine and bread, you are coming into communon with the body of christ. When people come to communion, jesus appears in the Eucharist (when more than one come in my name). When jesus is made present in communion/Eucharist/the heart of the faith-the food of communion, it becomes a literal Passion when one lives in Christ (Mass), dies in Christ (act of repentance), and resurrected in Christ (taking the Eucharist).
Saying it's symbolic is calling people who come together in Christ symbolic. That's a genuine assertion but when you actually experience the sacraments, it's not symbolic.
Catholics believe this IS my blood and this IS my body (as above) is a literal event (as described above). This my reflect symbolism to you, but it isn't to Catholics. It's not a rebuttal scripture. It's just you're seeing it differently than a Catholic would.
We had different experiences. When I took the sacraments, I felt I was literally being washed of my sins when baptized in water. When I repented, it wasn't symbolic, I actually spoke to god, shared my sins to god, and been absolved by god. When I took the Eucharist I was literally with other people in the body of Christ. By my being there, I made Christ present in the Eucharist. So when we ate of the consecrated meal (not a symbolic meal), we lived, died, and rose in the Body of Christ. It's a beautiful experience when seen as an actual experience not a symbolic one. But many people probably get the same feeling from symbolism. I don't.
Lets agree that our experiences of communion were different but nonetheless profound for us both.
If it were symbolism, then would it matter the convenant. You can change beliefs just like a drop of a hat. However, you literally took the sacraments. You will always be Catholic (my opinion) regardless of how far you leave the Church. That's one thing I liked about the Church is Christ doesn't leave his body. Just both of us as non-practicing Catholics no longer commune with people (body) to make Christ present in the Eucharist. Nothing wrong with that. Doesn't change it's a fact and literal. Just we're not diggin' it anymore.
I've been a Baha'i for over 25 years so I don't change beliefs at the drop of a hat. Like you I will always have a profound connection to the Christian faith. I have a sense that growing up a Catholic is very different from growing up a Protestant.
Christ said He came to fulfil the law of Moses. Baha'u'llah came to fulfil the teachings of Christ.
I wish it was a place for art. It's my religion. Can't talk about religion without mentioning how I express it. I don't separate the two.
You can always include your art work in your posts.
You say that Hinduism prophized the coming of Bahaullah. You also mentioned Krisha as an educator and prophet. That's incorporating your interpretation of Hinduism in your faith.
Since you are different religions as you say, why is it in your religion. Since it is, that is why you are corrected by Hindu themselves. However, because it's your religion, I don't know if you can see how Bahai claim isn't true based on what Hindu know about their own religion rather than an outside party.
We are corrected by everyone, not just the Hindus. So you admit that beliefs can be false by suggesting Baha'i beliefs to be false?
As to the main question here, that would better be answered by a Hindu who has become a Baha'i.
In the meantime I'm comfortable about the obvious differences between Hindu and Baha'i belief.
Yeah. I would like to know more about the Pagan faith (Eureopian pre-christian religions). I'm a pagan (lower -p). They would call me new age. It also means someone who isn't christian, jew, or muslim. I also consider it a practice of values and culture I've been raised. It involves dance, physical prayer, and rituals. None too different than other religions. Just, Pagans are a lot older than the rest of you all.
On that note, I don't worship, so I believe in spirits. Gods are beings you worship or revere. I don't understand how a being can just exist without actually at once being a person or living environment. I say I'm pagan for convenience. I have no label. Just me. Artists probably find it hard to label themselves given the exotic flourishing nature of life and it's many truths
I didn't see that coming.
You sound like a Christian who no longer believes in
the core Christian belief, namely a loving, just, omnipotent, and All-powerful God.
Thank you for clarifying your belief.
I'm a Christian who believes in that God, Jesus, and the authority and authenticity of the Bible. I believe Baha'u'llah is the son of man returned in the glory of the Father. Therefore I now call myself a Baha'i.
We have different beliefs and that is fine.
I'm not a "science-focused" person. Facts are psychological too. Not all facts are physical and need to be tested.
I worked in psychiatry for seven years before moving into general practice. Some psychological realities are unhealthy, believe me.
Heard of cognitive behavioural therapy? Some people need to learn to question their beliefs because they hinder healthy and happy living.
What falsehood? what do you mean by false? and by who considers what one person's truth is false and another true?
Judge not lest ye be judged!