McBell
Unbound
Do you really not understand or are you playing poe?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How can you justify the sheer complexity that evolution would have to evolve?
- Thread starter wordy80
- Start date
You didn’t answer my question.
McBell
Unbound
So basically you are claiming that Jehovah is nothing more than energy?
Based on what?
What evidence have you to support your claim?
McBell
Unbound
you mean:
What is the level of evidence of evidence for abiogenesis?
Here you go:The origin of life: what we know, what we can know and what we will never know - PMC
The origin of life (OOL) problem remains one of the more challenging scientific questions of all time. In this essay, we propose that following recent experimental and theoretical advances in systems chemistry, the underlying principle governing the ...
And there it is, a buttload (actual measurement) more evidence for abiogenesis than "GodDidIt" is for creation.Which merely reinforces my claim of your double standards.
McBell
Unbound
So then, following your own presented logic, you and I are also god....
Lol. You didn’t even read your “evidence.”you mean:
What is the level of evidence of evidence for abiogenesis?Here you go:
The origin of life: what we know, what we can know and what we will never know - PMC
The origin of life (OOL) problem remains one of the more challenging scientific questions of all time. In this essay, we propose that following recent experimental and theoretical advances in systems chemistry, the underlying principle governing the ...www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
And there it is, a buttload (actual measurement) more evidence for abiogenesis than "GodDidIt" is for creation.
Which merely reinforces my claim of your double standards.
It offers you no support.
Read the article, and see how many times the words “problem”, “problems” or “problematic” appears. Or related words, like “challenging.”
What a silly reply!
Not even a worthy strawman argument, it’s too oafish.
Lol.
McBell
Unbound
And it is STILL more evidence than what your creationist "GodDidIt" offers.
And again you demonstrate my point about your double standards.
Nope.
There’s obvious design in all interacting systems, especially in living systems, displaying purpose & function.
This required an intelligent mind. (Which may be why you won’t understand it.)
What are you, 14?
A “buttload”?you mean:
What is the level of evidence of evidence for abiogenesis?Here you go:
The origin of life: what we know, what we can know and what we will never know - PMC
The origin of life (OOL) problem remains one of the more challenging scientific questions of all time. In this essay, we propose that following recent experimental and theoretical advances in systems chemistry, the underlying principle governing the ...And there it is, a buttload (actual measurement) more evidence for abiogenesis than "GodDidIt" is for creation.
Which merely reinforces my claim of your double standards.
Animadversions of a Synthetic Chemist | James Tour | Inference
Chemists study molecules. Synthetic chemists make them. What Nature does is anyone’s guess. James Tour describes constructing nanovehicles from scratch, and considers the implications. Do we really know anything about abiogenesis?
An honest analysis.
Thanks, Dr. Tour.
McBell
Unbound
All the whining you do about how much atheists insult you and here you are, doing the very thing you claim to be better than...
You are still ignoring the fact that you have double standards when it comes to evidencing your beliefs and evidencing abiogenesis.
In fact, you are going to great lengths to avoid it.
to the extent of doing the very thing you whine so excessively of being done to you.
McBell
Unbound
Quote mining is nothing more than lying.A “buttload”?
Animadversions of a Synthetic Chemist | James Tour | Inference
Chemists study molecules. Synthetic chemists make them. What Nature does is anyone’s guess. James Tour describes constructing nanovehicles from scratch, and considers the implications. Do we really know anything about abiogenesis?inference-review.com
An honest analysis.
Thanks, Dr. Tour.
Interesting how you had to quote mine me in order to reply.
Even more interesting is that you merely demonstrate my point that the link I provided has a buttload (real measurement) more evidence for abiogenesis than "GodDidIt" presents for creation.
That you quote mined it is merely icing on the cake when revealing Liars For Jesus to the world.
Pogo
Well-Known Member
If you could get beyond your own bias, you might realize that you believe in abiogenesis too.
There was a time when there was no life on earth, like form and void.
There is life on earth now.
Ergo abiogenesis occurred.
We have lots of chemical evidence that it is a not impossible result of normal chemical reactions.
You have the claims in an old book from long before chemistry was understood.
Pogo
Well-Known Member
Energy is not biological life so whether it has always existed or what nick-name you call it is irrelevant to the question at hand.
McBell
Unbound
you try to insult me by making claims on my intelligence and you then go here?
ROTFLMAO
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
You've got it backwards.
There is no evidence that "the Bible is inspired by God."
There IS gigantic body of evidence indicating that evolution is a fact of life.
Incredible!
Nope, lol.
McBell
Unbound
Well, show where I quote-mined your link. Prove me wrong.
If you can’t, then everyone will know who the liar is.