Missing the mark causes women to suffer the pains of child bearing? Missing the mark causes all of mankind to inherit their mistake? All they did was eat some fruit. Hardly the crime of the Century is it?
???? You asked what sin was which I answered.
Now you are talking about something totally different. Please don't move the goal post.
As far as the moved goalpost, the mistake was giving the dominion of the world to Satan. I think that is a larger error than just "eating a fruit".
Man has been programmed to seek the meaning of life beyond natural World.
Agreed
I see self awareness and guilt. No blood sacrifice. And if you think Jesus pbuh was the blood sacrifice, then how has that shown changed hearts since he left Earth?
Yes, a law gives us self awareness of guilt. Without a law there is no awareness of guilt.
How has it shown changed hearts? Well... besides mine, there was Saul who became Paul, Simon who became Peter and the billions of others all over the world who would say "I have a heart change".
Scripturally, God said "
Ezekiel 11:
19 I will give them an undivided heart and put a new spirit in them; I will remove from them their heart of stone and give them a heart of flesh.
Ezekiel 36:
26 I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit in you; I will remove from you your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh.
Good God fearing people existed since the time of Adam and Eve pbut, and have existed in many cultures/beliefs outside of Christianity after Jesus pbuh left. Clearly there was ZERO result of a pointless human sacrifice, and nothing to do with any original sin. Jesus pbuh himself knew nothing about this Church Doctrine.
Yes... there have been good God fearing people... did I say there wasn't?
but.. "ZERO"??? Jesus knew this doctrine as his precursor and clarion said "Behold the Lamb of God that takes away the sins of the world"!
Jesus (pbuh) himself said in Matt 28:
28 This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.
They initially used fig leaves:
Gen 3:7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.
In verse 21: Unto Adam also and to his wife did the Lord God make coats of skins, and clothed them.
No mention of a Lamb. you would think it should have been a perfect opportunity to mention lamb and make the important connection to the First Century account of crucfiction.
If you care to read a little more carefully, I said "I believe" and not "it was". It could have been a bull too or whatever.
I believe it was a lamb because Abel brought a lamb and sacrificed it and it was acceptable to God. Who taught him if not Adam? I believe it was a lamb because He told Moses to sacrifice a lamb.
I could be wrong, of course, but the real issue was that a blood covenant was enacted, the strongest of covenants.
Their punishment was to leave Eden and toil the land for their sustenance, and await guidance.
yes... that was part of it.
There are Billions of people in communion with God, who do not believe in the made up cross sacrifice.
How do you know? And how do you know that it wasn't the sacrifice that made it possible?