Poeticus
| abhyAvartin |
namaskaram
equaly I dont see the any wish to seperate them on my behalf , taking up a dharmic religion one takes up the dharmic behaviors that are by their very nature more prevelent in their place of origin , to me the longer one practices the deper ones understanding is of indian , asian , indic ...culture becomes , one dosent nececarily have to take on every aspect but I canot help but think as one continues to practice one naturaly takes on more of these characteristics as a part of ones progress ...
and never could I wish that india looses these characteristics , for if it did it would be the influence of adharmic behaviors coming from the west .
Your thoughts are well-intentioned and well-motivating. As an Indian, I really
appreciate your support and admiration. But I spoke about intellectual honesty
and I feel it appropriate to stay intellectually honest and state that India today
is far from being truly Dharmic. The country has already lost numerous Dharmic
aspects in societal conduct - and it is so removed from the Ancient and Classical
days of yore that it is almost entirely a different socio-cultural landscape now.
Violence on women is high; casteism in both villages and cities is high; corruption
levels are incredibly high, etc.. Granted that there is a very high possibility that
a "mythical India ripe with Golden Age-like Dharma" never truly existed, but it's
definitely not the same India that once thrived in 400 BCE - 400 CE.
I really don't get why the West is seen as so Adharmic. India has its share of
Adharmism, if not more than the West. Even the Rishi-s, in my opinion, would
have a difficult time acknowledging that today's India is the same as the one
they meditated in.
appreciate your support and admiration. But I spoke about intellectual honesty
and I feel it appropriate to stay intellectually honest and state that India today
is far from being truly Dharmic. The country has already lost numerous Dharmic
aspects in societal conduct - and it is so removed from the Ancient and Classical
days of yore that it is almost entirely a different socio-cultural landscape now.
Violence on women is high; casteism in both villages and cities is high; corruption
levels are incredibly high, etc.. Granted that there is a very high possibility that
a "mythical India ripe with Golden Age-like Dharma" never truly existed, but it's
definitely not the same India that once thrived in 400 BCE - 400 CE.
I really don't get why the West is seen as so Adharmic. India has its share of
Adharmism, if not more than the West. Even the Rishi-s, in my opinion, would
have a difficult time acknowledging that today's India is the same as the one
they meditated in.