• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How do you detect "design"?

Pogo

Well-Known Member
if the QR opens a website I would conclude that the input data was probably design even if I had no prior knowledge of it being designed”
And you are not taking over the world tonight, but I'm sure there will be another episode and Pinky will again point out your failures.
Do yourself a favor and change your avatar, it is just to laughable. :)
 

Pogo

Well-Known Member
I've noticed sometimes even though it's obvious a person is wrong, it's going to be a yes/no/yes/no/ ad infinitum until it possibly develops into "yes, you're really ignorant..."
Yup, that is where we will eventually end up re @leroy, for which there are the expressions, Bless your Heart and the roll eyes emoji.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
I haven't made an argument. I'm responding to your claims.
Yes QR are always designed by QR generators (by computers and programs)

My point is that the input of data, (the numbers and letters that you would put in the QR generator)……………..may or may no be designed.
Your point doesn't make any sense. I pointed that out in the post you've just responded to.
1 you could carefully and purposely put specific numbers and letters (design)

2 you can type random letters and numbers (no design)

The test that I suggest is :

If the QR opens a website then the input of data is designed……
I just addressed this in the post you are responding to. You've decided to just repeat yourself, for some reason.
………….so far nobody has disagreed with the validity of this test……….so tacitly you are all agreeing with me
I just disagreed with the validity of your test. I just saw another poster do the same.
 

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Yup, that is where we will eventually end up re @leroy, for which there are the expressions, Bless your Heart and the roll eyes emoji.
My eyes are almost rolling over your comment...thanks for another laugh today! I mean if you people want to make yourselves look stupid, you're doing an excellent job. (lol)
 

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
I don't because I have found no evidence for the fact that a human can be right or wrong.
GOOD ANSWER! Solves the hurdle, right? lol, there's no right or wrong and of course "sovereign citizens" must believe that too, also autonomous persons. Eve wanted to be one.
 

Pogo

Well-Known Member
My eyes are almost rolling over your comment...thanks for another laugh today! I mean if you people want to make yourselves look stupid, you're doing an excellent job. (lol)
You haven't noticed that nobody takes you seriously any more?
Our condolences.
 

Pogo

Well-Known Member
How do you know if a person looks stupid?
images

Physics?
 

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
You haven't noticed that nobody takes you seriously any more?
Our condolences.
"YOUR" condolences? :) Thanks, I don't need them. You've helped make me happier and better than I was a while back! THANK YOU THANK YOU THANK YOU!!
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
LOL, yes, thank you...better than ever after reading replies likes yours. I won't call it dumb because that's not 'nice.' and how would someone know anyway, right?

Well, if you actually stop answering with what appear to be feelings and try to understand how 2 or more people can claim the other one(s) are wrong, yet they can all act on it and it is observable to happen, you might learn something new.
 
Top