shmogie
Well-Known Member
Why would someone tell another to drink out of a toilet hen clean water sinks are easily available to all ?
This stretches logic
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How do you explain AOC's hysterical irrational behavior?
- Thread starter whirlingmerc
- Start date
This stretches logic
sealchan
Well-Known Member
You know her well enough to assert that she is prone to uncontrolled emotion and can't think?
Maybe she was emotional in that moment having witnessed people suffering in horrible conditions that her government, her country was responsible for. We all (us humans) become emotional and think less clearly as a result. This might have been one of those moments for her. She might have been accurately relaying information provided to her. She still bears responsibility for verifying such things before putting the weight of her office behind it.
sealchan
Well-Known Member
And yet...
Lawmakers Respond To 'Vile,' Secret Facebook Group Created By Border Patrol Agents
The idea that people are not cruel therefore something couldn't happen...stretches credulity.
From what I have observed, Trump functions at that level most of the time. Maybe you should do with Trump like you do with AOC when you refer to her as the "bartender". You could call him the "Grabber".
Surely her detractors must know her very well to draw such specific conclusions about her. They would not be making that up as an emotional response to someone just because they do not agree with her politics. Would they? No. Maybe.
That makes sense. Seeing children put under duress would make me sort of emotional. I have several friends in law enforcement that have expressed emotion when discussing harm that has been done to children.
If she is going to do her job right, I would expect her to follow up and get the best information that is available. I used to expect that of our presidents, but I have given up on that expectation in the present case for a number of reasons.
But wasn't the claim that the sink part wasn't working?
If their opinions are based on emotion they'll respond to challenges emotionally. If they can't counter with facts they'll counter with ah homs and innuendo.
shmogie
Well-Known Member
Never heard that.
shmogie
Well-Known Member
No group on FB is ¨secret¨. They are called closed groups. If RF was on the FB platform, it would be a closed group.
Just like here, people are admitted to a closed group based upon rudimentary self volunteered information, and they can use any name they choose. Of their membership, I have no doubt that many are not BP agents.
The example I saw as being somehow bad is the photo of a drowned father and child. The picture was published through the news media. In the post about the photo the bodies were referred to as floaters, a common law enforcement term, not suitable for public dissemination, but a working term. The group is not a public group.
Other very disturbing terms were posted, but until each post is investigated, and determined for sure to have been made by an active BP agent, they jihadiś should hold judgement.
Maybe you should extend your information sources beyond propaganda sites like Fox News, Glenn Beck or Sean Hannity.
SugarOcean
¡pɹᴉǝM ʎɐʇS
Abomination Of Congress could be Bi-Polar or Schizophrenic. Diagnosed or un-diagnosed. She could suffer also from alcoholic dementia. Or, she could be expressing a personality that is acting out under the influence.
HRC in her last book admitted to being a wino. AOC's made video's where she's drinking and slurring her words and those are put out to the public.
I doubt she'll have a second term. Her conduct as a freshman member has been not the best from the start of her first term in the House. Her ethics are in question too.
HRC in her last book admitted to being a wino. AOC's made video's where she's drinking and slurring her words and those are put out to the public.
I doubt she'll have a second term. Her conduct as a freshman member has been not the best from the start of her first term in the House. Her ethics are in question too.
Trump, on the other hand....
Shad
Veteran Member
She wanted the Bill to be one of reform not just funding. She gambled and lost in a slam dunk vote.
Should be renamed....
Dr Why
Alas, she makes news by aping Trump's style of unrestrained
stream of (loopy) consciousness public announcements.
Last edited:
Not a fan?
I turned on Dr Who once.
Paint was drying on the wall.
The paint won in capturing my interest.
(Even STDS9 usually beat the paint.)
I suppose I am going to have to pay more attention to her to be fair. Better to look at than Trump is anyway. Is that wrong of me to say. I am not suggesting only attractive women are worth paying attention to and I am not suggesting that aging men are not. I feel I must clarify and qualify ever potential statement I make regarding the opposite...is it gender that is acceptable now or what? Should I say sex.
Sorry, my sarcastic response to PC and how men cannot say they find someone attractive anymore without being burned at stake or incurring the wrath of the entire feminine community that I respect and consider first among equals.
I have been a fan since the late 1970's when it was first accessible to me here in the states.