questfortruth
Well-Known Member
ABSTRACT:
There is a problem in quantum physics: a particle can be in two places at the same time. Why is not that particle an Omnipresent Spirit? How to restore the naturalism of nature? Because of this nonlocal omnipresence, Quantum Science fails to align with Einstein's purely materialistic Theories.
There are two known solutions to the divinity of nature:
1. a quantum particle has a certain trajectory, but it runs through many universes: the theory of Dr. Hugh Everett. [NOTE: However, his solution to the problem of the divinity of nature is not at all a solution if we consider the definite universe (it means "our universe", which is supposedly only one from many universes). Indeed, in this universe, a particle does not have a definite trajectory (even according to Dr. Everett's theory) but can be in two places at the same time. I can make no sense of Dr. Everett's theory.]
2. a quantum particle has a certain trajectory, but it lies only in one universe: the theory of the pilot wave from Dr. David Bohm.
These solutions found not only theoretical objections, but an experiment was carried out (to prove the multiplicity of worlds). Although the experiment gave a positive answer about the existence of many worlds, it met with criticism from serious scientists.
Albert Einstein argues against the non-locality of Quantum Physics, but it is largely believed, that "the experiments overturn his opinions about it and better idea prevail." I have the stuff, which would make Einstein the winner in the debate: the third solution.
INTRODUCTION:
MY PAPER:
If a scientist assumes the premise: "We have only one Universe", then he faces an illogical problem: "a particle can be in several places at the same time". The proposed yet solutions are:
Solution 1: many-worlds interpretation,
Solution 2: David Bohm pilot wave interpretation.
Solution 1 is the same as solution 2 because both solutions
is the rejection of the uncertainty principle in favor of the classical determinism and classical trajectories.
I mean, if it is given, that Bob is in Moscow and London at a given moment, then the above solutions suggest:
Solution 1: Bob only in Moscow in Universe A (no Bob in London then), and Bob in London in Universe B,
Solution 2: Bob only in Moscow, and there is only one Universe.
However, the rejection of the uncertainty principle comes with wrongness:
The experimental test to prove the existence of many-worlds has failed to convince the scientific community because has faced serious criticism:
My own (not peer-reviewed, but rejected by many top journals) solution is being downloaded via the Personal Message to me. Or write directly to [email protected]
APPLICATION TO THEOLOGY:
In many worlds, there are many souls of one human being.
Thus, the many-worlds scenario can not be followed by the theists, at least by the Abrahamic religions.
FURTHER READING:
Thank you. If you have enjoyed, then please step into discussions below:
World as Fairy-tale
Safe fall into Black Hole? Spagettification is illusory
Dr. Zhu and Riemann Hypothesis
There is a problem in quantum physics: a particle can be in two places at the same time. Why is not that particle an Omnipresent Spirit? How to restore the naturalism of nature? Because of this nonlocal omnipresence, Quantum Science fails to align with Einstein's purely materialistic Theories.
There are two known solutions to the divinity of nature:
1. a quantum particle has a certain trajectory, but it runs through many universes: the theory of Dr. Hugh Everett. [NOTE: However, his solution to the problem of the divinity of nature is not at all a solution if we consider the definite universe (it means "our universe", which is supposedly only one from many universes). Indeed, in this universe, a particle does not have a definite trajectory (even according to Dr. Everett's theory) but can be in two places at the same time. I can make no sense of Dr. Everett's theory.]
2. a quantum particle has a certain trajectory, but it lies only in one universe: the theory of the pilot wave from Dr. David Bohm.
These solutions found not only theoretical objections, but an experiment was carried out (to prove the multiplicity of worlds). Although the experiment gave a positive answer about the existence of many worlds, it met with criticism from serious scientists.
Albert Einstein argues against the non-locality of Quantum Physics, but it is largely believed, that "the experiments overturn his opinions about it and better idea prevail." I have the stuff, which would make Einstein the winner in the debate: the third solution.
INTRODUCTION:
MY PAPER:
If a scientist assumes the premise: "We have only one Universe", then he faces an illogical problem: "a particle can be in several places at the same time". The proposed yet solutions are:
Solution 1: many-worlds interpretation,
Solution 2: David Bohm pilot wave interpretation.
Solution 1 is the same as solution 2 because both solutions
is the rejection of the uncertainty principle in favor of the classical determinism and classical trajectories.
I mean, if it is given, that Bob is in Moscow and London at a given moment, then the above solutions suggest:
Solution 1: Bob only in Moscow in Universe A (no Bob in London then), and Bob in London in Universe B,
Solution 2: Bob only in Moscow, and there is only one Universe.
However, the rejection of the uncertainty principle comes with wrongness:
The experimental test to prove the existence of many-worlds has failed to convince the scientific community because has faced serious criticism:
My own (not peer-reviewed, but rejected by many top journals) solution is being downloaded via the Personal Message to me. Or write directly to [email protected]
APPLICATION TO THEOLOGY:
In many worlds, there are many souls of one human being.
Thus, the many-worlds scenario can not be followed by the theists, at least by the Abrahamic religions.
FURTHER READING:
Thank you. If you have enjoyed, then please step into discussions below:
World as Fairy-tale
Safe fall into Black Hole? Spagettification is illusory
Dr. Zhu and Riemann Hypothesis
Last edited:
