No. It's "evil" of believers to threaten skeptics for questioning Christian dogma. Typically, this occurs when the believer is told that that the unbeliever doesn't see a reason to believe that dogma. He is then told that he'll be sorry in a veiled threat of some post-mortem meeting wherein he'll be judged and punished for his skepticism. The believer, if he addresses his terroristic message at all, will say that it is a warning made lovingly, constructively, and caringly, but it's not. It's resentment. It's frustration.
Only if you got the wrong message.
The message of Christianity is to submit and obey or suffer. The believer will tell you otherwise - call it a religion of love, and the offer of salvation a great gift from a loving god who made sacrifices for man, but that's just fluff. In the end, it's about the threat of salvation versus perdition and the solution to this invented problem is to cleanse oneself of sin by submitting to the alleged commands of an intolerant god or else.
I know you don't like that, but can you falsify the claim, that is, demonstrate where it is wrong. I don't mean just disagree and state what you believe or prefer others to believe, but to demonstrate why the claim I made is wrong. You can't do it. Why? Because one can't falsify a correct statement.
When I see His hands and His side, I see love and not fear.
This is why I reject and condemn the Christian version of love. I just saw Forrest Gump again, and Forrest says, "I'm not a smart man but I know what love is." Me, too, and that is not it. Love has nothing to do with torture. I love my wife and she loves me. The relationship does not involve puncturing holes in hands or torso. It is not about suffering.
I always wondered why you sound so angry.
More passive-aggression. He doesn't ever sound angry.
When you run out of ideas, you seem to like to turn to threat or an insult.