• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

How shall we correct this injustice?

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Due to the fact that the Dems weaponized the justice system and the fact that - New York City is filled with Koldos and crazy Dems who hate Trump - I am sure Trump did not receive a fair trial.

But now he is the President-elect of the United States! And now it is time for you guys to experience a 4 years mental agony.:D

Must be depressing to be a Koldo or a Dem now. No?:D

You are already suffering - so I am going to leave it that. I shouldn't go overboard by rubbing it in your and your friends faces any further.
I gave you a tiny dose. Share it with your counterparts. Rub it on your faces. Sharing is caring!
:D
Not a fact.

Also, Trump's team had a hand in picking the jury members, of course. Your excuses don't fly here.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Once again - sorry to hear what you went through in your early days.
You do know that - if you were a juror in a rape or sexual assaults case -you would have been excused by the Judge.
Defense lawyer for the accused could also ask you to be dismissed because you won't be impartial.
So, for the same reason - it is fruitless talking to you on this regard.
You will always believe Trump raped her.
That's what court records indicate. I'm going with that. That's a fact.
You're the one playing make-believe here.
A 52 year old lady (E Jean Carrol) who was a journalist at the time - should never wait until she is 75 years old to report her rape incident.
That is not fair for the defender (Trump).

If someone is falsely accused - how can he defend himself after 26 years?
That is simply unacceptable.
This has already been explained to you.
 

BrightShadow

Active Member
Oh, Trump is just fine going into the dressing rooms, uninvited, of young girls he doesn't know as well. He said as much on The Howard Stern Show.

We already know Trump has been found civilly liable for sexual assault and defamation, by a judge and two juries. He rammed his fingers into E. Jean Carroll's v*****. That's rape, buddy. Try to explain it away all you want, but it only reflects poorly upon yourself.
Didn't I say - your opinion is not needed? You are biased.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
@IndigoChild5559 @F1fan @Koldo @Samael_Khan


Every case is different.

Scenario #1:
A 13 year old farm girl raped by her powerful drunk stepfather - who is friends with the local Sheriff.

Scenario #2:
A 52 years old Journalist pulled the rape card - who was self reliant in every aspect in her life at the time of occurrence and wealthy enough to afford to go and shop at the Bergdorf's. And what is the job of a Journalist? Report things. Right? But she doesn't report in for 26 years. :rolleyes:


In scenario #1 - Even if the young girl waits multiple years before opening her mouth - I would still tend to believe her. I will think - may be she was too young to realize what happened to her and didn't see that it was an extremely wrong thing. Maybe she was afraid her mother won't believe her. Maybe she thought if she makes noise then she and her mother won't have a place to live anymore. Etc.

None of that applies to a 52 years old Journalist!

A 52 years old Journalist went to shop at an expensive store where they sell designer clothing, designer shoes and designers purses worth thousands of dollars. She meets a multi millionaire there. She decides to go into the dressing-room with him. Something happened in there. She comes out but doesn't feel a need to call the security - instead she continues shopping around with the millionaire. Maybe she decided to get a $3,999 dress because the dress she was wearing got a stain on it. ;) Maybe the millionaire offered to pay for the new dress. Maybe she declined thinking that would turn off the millionaire. Her eyes was really on the $7.999 dress but that was over her 4K limit. Later she tries to reach out to the millionaire but the millionaire just got into a serious relationship with someone else and ignores her calls. With her missed opportunity to hook up with a great catch - she started to grow some resentments - and then years later she decides to write a book. You know the title of that book!:D

You cannot just paint both the scenarios #1 and #2 with the same brush. You just can't!

To give the same courtesy to a 52 year old journalist as you would give to a 13 year old - is simply foolish.
A 52 years old doesn't deserve it.

Anyone naive enough to believe a 52 years old Journalist (who waits 26 years until she is 75 years or so old) - should have their head examined. They should realize that the Justice System needs to be balanced towards the accused individual as well. Otherwise you would open up a Pandora's box and some women will abuse the system and take down innocent men.

How can a man defend himself against false allegation after 26 years?

Like I said - what happened in NYC - would open up a Pandora's box. Wealthy people will be targeted there with this new "Adult Survivors Act". This law contradicts with the state's constitution. The State's constitution has a 'statutes of limitations' for certain crimes - for a reason. Don't ignore those reasons.

Or else you will have a Kangaroo court - a court that would will always take side with the women against any men on a rape case.





Read my post #159 on page 8.



In a Civil court - all you have to do is show probabilities that it probably took place.
51% to 49%
Probably happened does not mean it happened. It means it most likely happened because the defender couldn't prove it didn't happen.
That is insane!

The only way Trump could have defended that it didn't happen - he would have to show he was gay or he was OCD and thus he would never do something like that. He would have to bring everyone he ever married or dated to support that claim that he never puts his finger in there.
How crazy is that? How else he can show he didn't put his finger in there?



How do you defend against that after 26 years? If you have had a one-night stand and didn't like the experience and then the girl tries to reach out to you like a stalker and you avoid her then - out of frustration she could rationalize her experience as a bad one.
This is simply a defense mechanism. Every human has that. Months after a car accident - most people fight it in court that they were innocent.
Just stop dude.
Your posts are the very epitome of rape culture.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Watch your favorite individual (E Jean Carroll). She painted her trees and rocks around her house blue.

https://www.tiktok.com/video/7325242097521429803
She named her dog "tits" and cat "Vagina".

She claimed she dated 16 people at the same time because that's what the New Yorkers do.:rolleyes:

Sound about right! Shows what you support.:D


Btw, I am not defending Trump only - I am defending all men against false allegations. Allegations they cannot disprove after 26 years.
Give them a fair trial. Report incidents in a timely manner.

Stop the Witch hunt.
Irrelevant gibberish.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
If you can't handle the heat... get out of the...;)

Why make a thread post a biased 'book' and not expect anyone to disagree with you?
You should be happy that I wasted my time reading it.

I am aware you don't read everything. I called your original post biased and you didn't protest. You quietly accepted it.:D So, I figured you didn't read my initial response to you on page 4 post#62.

Anyhow if it is true that you don't read - then you ruined the possibility of learning something worthwhile. ;)

This is how some Dems never learn anything. They block out all facts and remain blind and biased among their likeminded folks. They believe something and then close out their doors and windows - so nothing else can come in. Every thing else is a lie!

Majority rules, remember? Dems lost. It is time to listen to the other side. (the side with common sense).




Obviously this Journalist lied in court. I can say that with 99.99% certainty.
People lie in court all the time. Both sides can't be trusted at the same time.

It is possible she was raped by someone in her early days but it wasn't by Trump and it couldn't be at the Bergdorf.
Zero chance of that... Zilch.

She did not remember the day, month or year of the encounter.:rolleyes:
She gave a window of two years (1995 - 1996) when it could have happened.

How can Trump defend against such vague accusation?
She kept the dress she was wearing that day. When asked why she kept it - her response was - she love that dress. The question remains - why she couldn't write down the date when it supposedly took place?

Had she given the date of the incident then Trump may have been able to show where he was on that day. Maybe he was in Italy or maybe he was in Spain. Why take away the opportunity from someone falsely accused? A person can exonerate himself by simply showing a firm alibi. Why a a specific 'date' is not on the table when it is a sudden one day incidence at a public place?





Ha ha ha. :D
People don't wait 26 years to report a mugging or a burglary. Of course cops would tend to believe mugging or burglary victims when they are called to the crime scene. But yet some people try to fake burglaries too - for the sake of insurance claims.

Similarly, cops would also believe a rape victim if they are called to the crime scene. So, it was a crazy comparison. You cannot compare on-site mugging reports with a rape that is reported 26 years later.

If you report a mugging or burglary for the first time after 26 years - then make sure you take a picture of yourself and post it on the social media. I will leave a decent but appropriate comment there. ;)

It will be something like this... "Good to see you recovered your brain after 26 years. What else did they take from you 26 years ago?"


Evidence is the key! Don't wait too long to report a crime.

I can understand the psychological reasoning behind why some victims may delay in reporting or why some may not report it at all (I showed one scenario) but that does not apply to a 52 years old self-reliant Journalist who claimed to have dated 16 people at the same time. Watch the video. Whether she actually meant it or not - doesn't matter. She claimed (in her video) that she was never a shy woman. She was a cheerleader and cheerleaders should be able to scream even at age 52. She should have screamed at the top of her lungs for help while in that department store. They have incredible security there. Instead she finished shopping around.

Stop giving a free pass to every woman who uses the rape card.
I agree true victim don't use "rape cards". But fake ones do.


While many are true victims of this heinous crime, BUT there are also some who are frauds.
Don't let the "frauds" ruin it for the real victims or ruin innocent lives of men they falsely frame.


Tell the real victims to report immediately (if possible). The evidence will help their case.
At least tell the real victims to keep any evidence and write down date and time of occurrence. It is very important to do that. Basic 101.


At the end of the day - you should appreciate my honesty and my response.
If you were trying to write a book - I showed you all the fault lines.
Pay attention to it - just like the Californians should pay attention to their fault lines.


Earth Quake is a *^*^*
More victim blaming and rape culture nonsense.

Trump was found civilly liable for sexual assault and defamation. That's what the records show. All your protestations and rationalizing will not change that.
 
Top