• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Human Evolution in Action - High-Altitude Adaptation in Humans

The Neo Nerd

Well-Known Member
High-altitude adaptation in humans - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

High-altitude adaptation in humans is an instance of evolutionary modification in human populations, most notably among the Tibetans, as well as Andean and Ethiopian highlanders, who have acquired a unique ability to survive at extremely high altitudes. The phrase is used to signify irreversible, long-term physiological responses to high-altitude environments, associated with heritable behavioural and genetic changes. While the rest of human population would suffer serious health consequences, these native inhabitants thrive well in the highest parts of the world, such as the Himalayas, Andes and Ethiopia. These people have undergone extensive physiological and genetic changes, particularly in the regulatory systems of respiration and circulation, when compared to the general lowland population.[1][2] This special adaptation is now recognised as one of the finest examples of natural selection in action.[3] In fact, the adaptation account of the Tibetans has become the fastest case of human evolution in the scientific record, as it is estimated to occur in less than 3,000 years.[4][5][6]
 

Treks

Well-Known Member
I wonder if their adaptations come at the expense of wellness at low altitudes.
 

rusra02

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
So their bodies adapted to the climate they were in. That is something our Creator gave to all of us. A person from the lowlands can survive after an adjustment period in high altitudes, is this not true? And one from the high mountains can adapt to lower climes as well. Your example doe not prove macro-evolution, but rather the elementary truth that living organisms can adapt to changes in their environment.
 

Ultimatum

Classical Liberal
High-altitude adaptation in humans - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

High-altitude adaptation in humans is an instance of evolutionary modification in human populations, most notably among the Tibetans, as well as Andean and Ethiopian highlanders, who have acquired a unique ability to survive at extremely high altitudes. The phrase is used to signify irreversible, long-term physiological responses to high-altitude environments, associated with heritable behavioural and genetic changes. While the rest of human population would suffer serious health consequences, these native inhabitants thrive well in the highest parts of the world, such as the Himalayas, Andes and Ethiopia. These people have undergone extensive physiological and genetic changes, particularly in the regulatory systems of respiration and circulation, when compared to the general lowland population.[1][2] This special adaptation is now recognised as one of the finest examples of natural selection in action.[3] In fact, the adaptation account of the Tibetans has become the fastest case of human evolution in the scientific record, as it is estimated to occur in less than 3,000 years.[4][5][6]

Whilst I am a pro-Evolution advocate, this isn't "Evolution in action" as if it encompasses the scale of evolution in one instance.
This is adaptation or micro-evolution. But heed my word when I say that these people will continue to develop these changes and will eventually be a much hardier race than us "normal" humans.
 

jonathan180iq

Well-Known Member
I wonder if their adaptations come at the expense of wellness at low altitudes.

For certain individuals it does.

I honestly don't have time to search for the article supporting this, but I know it's there. It was a NatGeo thing that I just can't find at the moment.

It's similar to the sickle cell issue in Africans. They are adapted to be much more resistant to certain diseases, namely malaria and...well, dang it... something else. But when outside of a specific environment there is a downside, namely all of the negative of sickle cell anemia... Look that up too - it's interesting and easy to process on a lunch break or something.
 

The Neo Nerd

Well-Known Member
Whilst I am a pro-Evolution advocate, this isn't "Evolution in action" as if it encompasses the scale of evolution in one instance.
This is adaptation or micro-evolution. But heed my word when I say that these people will continue to develop these changes and will eventually be a much hardier race than us "normal" humans.

This is evolution in action.

Populations adapting to fit into their ecosystem is what it is about.
 

The Neo Nerd

Well-Known Member
For certain individuals it does.

I honestly don't have time to search for the article supporting this, but I know it's there. It was a NatGeo thing that I just can't find at the moment.

It's similar to the sickle cell issue in Africans. They are adapted to be much more resistant to certain diseases, namely malaria and...well, dang it... something else. But when outside of a specific environment there is a downside, namely all of the negative of sickle cell anemia... Look that up too - it's interesting and easy to process on a lunch break or something.

Is it that they have become resistant to malaria, but makes them susceptible to sickle cell anemia.

I seem to remember something about it. If you stumble across an article could you please post it.
 

jonathan180iq

Well-Known Member
Is it that they have become resistant to malaria, but makes them susceptible to sickle cell anemia.

I seem to remember something about it. If you stumble across an article could you please post it.
Yeah, of course. I'll dig it up tomorrow.
 
Top