Hunter Biden indicted today on 3 federal gun charges

[Subduction Zone]

You.keep making claims but not supporting them. We are done until you support your claims.

One last freebie...

Federal law prohibits many people from owning and possessing both firearms and ammunition. This includes convicted felons, illegal aliens, people who’ve been dishonorably discharged from the military, people who’ve been convicted of a misdemeanor domestic violence offense, and “unlawful users” of controlled substances.

plus he lied on a federal form to obtain a gun.

It is hardly a a freebie. Do you not realize for all of those cases that those people had to be convicted of a violent felony first or other violent crime first? They are all after the fact. Once again you are trying to practice prior restraint. You clearly are not following the discussion. Now you might have had a case if Hunter Biden was dishonorably discharged from the military, but he was not. His was an administrative discharge. Cocaine usage alone would not be enough to merit losing 2nd Amendment right alone in a dishonorable discharge. One needs to be discharged on at least "felony like" military offenses:

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

www.pbwt.com

 

[We Never Know]

It is hardly a a freebie. Do you not realize for all of those cases that those people had to be convicted of a violent felony first or other violent crime first? They are all after the fact. Once again you are trying to practice prior restraint. You clearly are not following the discussion. Now you might have had a case if Hunter Biden was dishonorably discharged from the military, but he was not. His was an administrative discharge. Cocaine usage alone would not be enough to merit losing 2nd Amendment right alone in a dishonorable discharge. One needs to be discharged on at least "felony like" military offenses:

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

www.pbwt.com

Lmfao!! Hunter isn't a dishonorably discharged veteran. That's what your link is about.

Please keep on track if you are going to comment.

Lets review... Why is Hunter indicted?
What are the reasons? Do you even know? lol

 

[Subduction Zone]

Lmfao!! Hunter isn't a dishonorably discharged veteran. That's what your link is about.

Wow! You did not even read our own source. You should know by now that whenever you facepalm me you should be facepalming yourself. The source that you quoted said that one could lose one's second amendment rights by being dishonorably discharged. I had to look up two things. Was Hunter's discharge dishonorable? No, it was not. You can look that up for yourself. If he had been dishonorably discharged would that alone have been enough , and again the answer was no. I was eliminating one of the possible sources that could have legally kept him from owning a gun. Unlike you, I tend to do my homework.

Please keep on track if you are going to comment.

Lets review... Why is Hunter indicted?
What are the reasons? Do you even know? lol

Yes, I know why. And that is what this discussion is about. Do you even know what "prior restraint " is?

I used the term more than once, you should have looked it up or at the very least asked. You also ran away from the question about your personal guns.

When a person runs away from a reasonable question as you did that often indicates that that means the person knows that he is wrong.

 

[We Never Know]

Wow! You did not even read our own source. You should know by now that whenever you facepalm me you should be facepalming yourself. The source that you quoted said that one could lose one's second amendment rights by being dishonorably discharged. I had to look up two things. Was Hunter's discharge dishonorable? No, it was not. You can look that up for yourself. If he had been dishonorably discharged would that alone have been enough , and again the answer was no. I was eliminating one of the possible sources that could have legally kept him from owning a gun. Unlike you, I tend to do my homework.


Yes, I know why. And that is what this discussion is about. Do you even know what "prior restraint " is?

I used the term more than once, you should have looked it up or at the very least asked. You also ran away from the question about your personal guns.

When a person runs away from a reasonable question as you did that often indicates that that means the person knows that he is wrong.

"Was Hunter's discharge dishonorable? No, it was not. You can look that up for youself"

Lmfao!!

I pointed that out already in post #42. The post you replied to with this post of yours lol
"Hunter isn't a dishonorably discharged veteran."


That deserves a double face palm since it shows your desperation.




What part of my post was bold? Lets review..
-was it about convicted felons? Nope
-was it about domestic abusers? Nope
-was it about being dishonorably discharged? Nope

Look at the bold... What was it?

You.keep making claims but not supporting them. We are done until you support your claims.

One last freebie...

Federal law prohibits many people from owning and possessing both firearms and ammunition. This includes convicted felons, illegal aliens, people who’ve been dishonorably discharged from the military, people who’ve been convicted of a misdemeanor domestic violence offense, and “unlawful users” of controlled substances.

plus he lied on a federal form to obtain a gun.

Back to skipping over and ignoring your posts because.... Well that's all they are good for

 

[Subduction Zone]

"Was Hunter's discharge dishonorable? No, it was not. You can look that up for youself"

Lmfao!!

I pointed that out already in post #42. The post you replied to with this post of yours lol
"Hunter isn't a dishonorably discharged veteran."


That deserves a double face palm since it shows your desperation.




What part of my post was bold? Lets review..
-was it about convicted felons? Nope
-was it about domestic abusers? Nope
-was it about being dishonorably discharged? Nope

Look at the bold... What was it?



Back to skipping over and ignoring your posts because.... Well that's all they are good for

Nope, I have not followed all of your ignorance, only the very latest.

And no one is disputing what you put in bold. That is such a poor argument that it can be refuted with a "so what"? You should be relieved as a gun lover that your rights are better protected than you seem to believe. By your standards the government could make gun ownership illegal in your home and come and confiscate all of your weapons.

How many times do you need to be told that there is a such a thing as the Second Amendment and the government still takes it very seriously.


You have as yet to even indicate that you understand what the phrase "prior restraint" refers to. Here is a hint, it is usually a first amendment issue, but the concept applies equally well to the second amendment.

 

[We Never Know]

Nope, I have not followed all of your ignorance, only the very latest.

And no one is disputing what you put in bold. That is such a poor argument that it can be refuted with a "so what"? You should be relieved as a gun lover that your rights are better protected than you seem to believe. By your standards the government could make gun ownership illegal in your home and come and confiscate all of your weapons.

How many times do you need to be told that there is a such a thing as the Second Amendment and the government still takes it very seriously.


You have as yet to even indicate that you understand what the phrase "prior restraint" refers to. Here is a hint, it is usually a first amendment issue, but the concept applies equally well to the second amendment.

One thought comes to mind...

 

[Subduction Zone]

One thought comes to mind...

View attachment 82206

You are simply describing yourself again.


Just try to be honest. It is not that hard to do .

 

[We Never Know]

You are simply describing yourself again.


Just try to be honest. It is not that hard to do .

Thanks for proving my point.

The best thing you could have done is not reply... But you HAD to lol

That was a test. You flunked. Research it

 

[Subduction Zone]

Thanks for proving my point.

The best thing you could have done is not reply... But you HAD to lol

That was a test. You flunked. Research it

What makes you think that you are qualified to even attempt such a test? Why is it that especially as it gets later and later at night that you appear to try to be wrong. Do you think that makes you a martyr somehow? Just own up to your obvious mistakes when you make them.

 

[SomeRandom]

Witch hunt or legitimate charges? Now remember, 'the law is the law'(for those that use that arguement)

"Two counts are tied to Biden allegedly completing a form indicating he was not using illegal drugs when he purchased a Colt Cobra revolver in October 2018. The third count alleges that he possessed a firearm while using a narcotic"

Hunter Biden indicted on federal gun charges

The president's son was indicted after a plea agreement on tax and gun charges fell apart in July and as House Republicans investigate his finances.

www-nbcnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org

Okay, as an outsider I legitimately have to ask, who cares???
You think that if a son or daughter of Pauline Hanson was in the news for some crime I would care in the slightest?
I grew up on media mocking her specifically. Like literally. She was a meme for all my life.
For reference

Pauline Hanson - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

You want to go after the actual reps in government, go for it. Please. I beg of you. Cut those jerks down for all of us to see. I’ll bring the popcorn
But otherwise? Geez talk about looking like sore losers. Sorry but that’s what it looks like from the outside.
Screw all the politicians. That’s my motto

 

[crossfire]

If you live in a state with legalized marijuana, and you use the legal marijuana, you can't buy a gun because marijuana is still illegal on the federal level. You would be guilty of the same thing as Hunter Biden is indicted for.

 

[SomeRandom]

If you live in a state with legalized marijuana, and you use the legal marijuana, you can't buy a gun because marijuana is still illegal on the federal level. You would be guilty of the same thing as Hunter Biden is indicted for.

Wait.
Is this all because this Hunter guy bought weed in a state where it was technically completely legal to do so? Or he bought a gun where it was technically legal to do so?
Please tell me you’re not being serious!!
Because damn!! That’s the easiest lawsuit in all of modern history, if true lmao!!
Like even we would sue over that.

You’re pulling my leg here, surely

 

[wellwisher]

These are serious charges and the evidence is strong. What more is there to say?

President Biden can pardon his son Hunter, after any trial. These charges were offered by the Biden Justice Department, because they are the few charges that do not connect to the President, and can be reversed with a pardon. There is no real harm done for the President, after a pardon. Fake news will not report it or spin it.

The other charges connected to the family business, that connects all the Biden, was not offered. This is legal postering by the Left. The Right will not take the gun charge, as trade, to stop the inquiry. That is not a good deal.

Biden may next offer to diminish the Trump charges. I am not sure that will be enough, either. None of the Trump charges will stick in the long term, but were designed for optics and election interference. These charges will be repealed in the future, but this could take until after the election. If Biden wins he could bury all evidence or make up new charges for Trump and others with the Injustice Department

It may be best for the right to continue with the inquiry, allowing a new Republican Candidate to take it all. Americans are tired of the decline in the country; overwhelmed with immigrants and inflation, and will choose someone from the Right who can restore fiscal and practical sanity.

 

[Guitar's Cry]

I think the fresh air is only metaphorical.

You're taking it figuratively.

 

[crossfire]

Wait.
Is this all because this Hunter guy bought weed in a state where it was technically completely legal to do so? Or he bought a gun where it was technically legal to do so?
Please tell me you’re not being serious!!
Because damn!! That’s the easiest lawsuit in all of modern history, if true lmao!!
Like even we would sue over that.

You’re pulling my leg here, surely

It was another drug (cocaine) that was not legal, and his stating on the application to buy the gun that he was not using drugs.

 

[SomeRandom]

It was another drug (cocaine) that was not legal, and his stating on the application to buy the gun that he was not using drugs.

Ahh I see
I swear. The more I hear about this case, the more I am confused lol

 

[Subduction Zone]

President Biden can pardon his son Hunter, after any trial. These charges were offered by the Biden Justice Department, because they are the few charges that do not connect to the President, and can be reversed with a pardon. There is no real harm done for the President, after a pardon. Fake news will not report it or spin it.

The other charges connected to the family business, that connects all the Biden, was not offered. This is legal postering by the Left. The Right will not take the gun charge, as trade, to stop the inquiry. That is not a good deal.

Biden may next offer to diminish the Trump charges. I am not sure that will be enough, either. None of the Trump charges will stick in the long term, but were designed for optics and election interference. These charges will be repealed in the future, but this could take until after the election. If Biden wins he could bury all evidence or make up new charges for Trump and others with the Injustice Department

It may be best for the right to continue with the inquiry, allowing a new Republican Candidate to take it all. Americans are tired of the decline in the country; overwhelmed with immigrants and inflation, and will choose someone from the Right who can restore fiscal and practical sanity.

No, he can't. He could only pardon Hunter on federal trials. I do not know if he faces local or federal charges. A President cannot pardon someone for state crimes.

 

[crossfire]

No, he can't. He could only pardon Hunter on federal trials. I do not know if he faces local or federal charges. A President cannot pardon someone for state crimes.

It was federal charges, not state charges.

 

[Revoltingest]

The more I hear about this case, the more I am confused lol

The more I hear about it, the less interested I am.

 

[Secret Chief]

You're taking it figuratively.

That's a poor analogy.