Post#78 & It's very difficult to claim ambiguity in the Torah regarding Moses' relationship with God.
Same with the Gospels.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Post#78 & It's very difficult to claim ambiguity in the Torah regarding Moses' relationship with God.
Can you find anything in the Gospels which details the Kingdom of God?Same with the Gospels.
Can you find anything in the Gospels which details the Kingdom of God?
It's ambiguous whether the Kingdom of God, which is promised in the Gospels, is good or bad. It depends on whose God is being referenced. I propose that it's not the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob because that God is referred to only as YHVH forever in all generations. Ref Exodus 3:15If you have a point then make it.
It's ambiguous whether the Kingdom of God, which is promised in the Gospels, is good or bad. It depends on whose God is being referenced. I propose that it's not the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob because that God is referred to only as YHVH forever in all generations. Ref Exodus 3:15
And God said further to Moses, "So shall you say to the children of Israel, 'The Lord God of your forefathers, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob, has sent me to you.' This is My name forever, and this is how I should be mentioned in every generation.
Can you cite scripture which details the Kingdom of God. If I recall, all there is in the Gospel is a parable about mustard seed. The prarable could be interpretted both positively and negatively. It's ambiguous.It's not ambiguous
Not according to the book of John. Maybe it's in other scripture? You're welcome to prove me wrong.Jesus and Moses God is one and the same,
Scripture please?Moses and Elijah both appeared to disciples and testified to Jesus, and they appeared to a bunch of people before that.
Right, the book of Matthew, not in the book of John.Suddenly Moses and Elijah appeared before them, talking with Jesus. 4Peter said to Jesus, “Lord, it is good for us to be here. If You wish, I will put up three sheltersa—one for You, one for Moses, and one for Elijah.”5While Peter was still speaking, a bright cloud enveloped them, and a voice from the cloud said, “This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.b Listen to Him!” 6When the disciples heard this, they fell facedown in terror.
Right, the book of Matthew, not in the book of John.
5While Peter was still speaking, a bright cloud enveloped them, and a voice from the cloud said, “This is My beloved Son,
Jesus in the book of John is different than the others.What's your point?
Jesus in the book of John is different than the others.
You've been ignoring the scripture I've been posting.You just never made an attempt to understand.
Well written.The following is from a Shiite brother (not me):
Salaam Aleikum,
Famous Gospel verse from John 10:30
I and the Father are one.
But it does not stop here, the most crucial part is the next verses where Jesus (عليه السلام) will clarify what does he mean by it.
Again his Jewish opponents picked up stones to stone him, 32 but Jesus said to them, “I have shown you many good works from the Father. For which of these do you stone me?”
33 “We are not stoning you for any good work,” they replied, “but for blasphemy, because you, a mere man, claim to be God.”
34 Jesus answered them, “Is it not written in your Law, ‘I have said you are “gods”’[d]? 35 If he called them ‘gods,’ to whom the word of God came—and Scripture cannot be set aside— 36 what about the one whom the Father set apart as his very own and sent into the world? Why then do you accuse me of blasphemy because I said, ‘I am God’s Son’? 37 Do not believe me unless I do the works of my Father. 38 But if I do them, even though you do not believe me, believe the works, that you may know and understand that the Father is in me, and I in the Father.” 39 Again they tried to seize him, but he escaped their grasp.
- Jesus (عليه السلام) was referring to Psalms 82:6
"I said, 'You are "gods"; you are all sons of the Most High.'
Here You are Gods and Sons of the Most High does not mean literal as Gods or that God literal Sons. Rather this means that they are agents of God, who represent the message and the commandments and the way that God have chosen for humankind. Their work/actions would be as what God want them to work/act.
I and The Father are one
This is equivalent in the Qur'an when God says:
He who obeys the Messenger has obeyed Allah ; but those who turn away - We have not sent you over them as a guardian. 4:80
Your friend was not misguided nor was he misled, nor does he speak out of personal desire. It is but an inspiration being inspired. 53:2-4
Another interesting to notice is the how Jews reacted on the matter. They almost right away took the stone and wanted to kill him, because they thought that he is saying that Jesus and God are One in Essence. Jesus denies it and explained them by referring the psalms 82:6 which is understood by jews clearly.
Qur'an want to clarify and make sure that Psalms 82:6 does not mean to take it literally but as in figurative:
Allah has not taken any son, nor has there ever been with Him any deity. 23:91
I see figurative verses are common in the Bible and the Quran.
I would also add that Baha'u'llah has also explained this topic in great detail. The Kitab-i-iqan is a very comprehensive explanation on this topic.
Regards Tony
I believe well written doe not mean correct logic.Well written.
Regards
I believe it is only marginally helpful to hear what a philosopher thinks and he is wrong as often as he is right.