I challenge the world , bring it on!

[james blunt]

A science section is my home turf, objectively I am a genius.

Most of the world is under cognitive control when it comes to science and the subjective education they are forced to accept or fail.

In saying that , I will set a series of challenges in this thread to main stream science by use of my cognitive freedom.

Challenge 1

A point has 0 dimensions , specifically no dimension of time. Einstein and science claims in such, there is a space-time.

Given the dimensions of XYZ = 1 cm ³ a spacial volume of geometrical points that is without any substance, i.e empty space

On examination of each individual point of the volume, the volume is without time.

My first challenge is for you/science to provide evidence that space-time exists in the given volume of space?

Quite obviously and axiom , space does not age and time is not relative to space. You are making it up Mr science, space-time is imaginary.

Not even a belief, an outright lie.

 

[james blunt]

Dear Mr moderators, nearly every science forum on the internet has me banned and on watch list for how I hurt science. I have faith in you that you will protect me from the subjective warrior trolls who want cognitive control over the world and try to stop me almost everywhere I go.

 

[allfoak]

space-time is imaginary.

Time is an aspect of mind.
We can move through time with the use of mind.

 

[james blunt]

Time is an aspect of mind.
We can move through time with the use of mind.

What is a yellow fruit that is curved? An orange

That is a comparison of your unrelated answer.

 

[YmirGF]

 

[james blunt]

Unrelated answer

 

[Orbit]

Find someone else to do your homework.

 

[james blunt]

Find someone else to do your homework.

Homework?

Another invalid effort, is this the best defence science can give , name calling?

i could make a better defence than you could but it would still be wrong because space-time is completely imaginary, Why not admit the lies of science ?

 

[Axe Elf]

What's the matter, you weren't getting enough attention any more in your first crazy thread and had to start another?

Let me ask you this: That cubic centimeter of empty space that you spoke about; is it older now than it was when you wrote about it?

If you say yes, then your claim that space does not age has been disproven.

If you say no, then your claim to be a genius has been disproven.

If you say anything else, then you are avoiding the question.

And now I put on the 3D glasses and grab the popcorn to watch you embarrass yourself in yet another thread.

 

[james blunt]

What's the matter, you weren't getting enough attention any more in your first crazy thread and had to start another?

Any defence or just blah blah?

 

[JoshuaTree]

A science section is my home turf, objectively I am a genius.

Most of the world is under cognitive control when it comes to science and the subjective education they are forced to accept or fail.

In saying that , I will set a series of challenges in this thread to main stream science by use of my cognitive freedom.

Challenge 1

A point has 0 dimensions , specifically no dimension of time. Einstein and science claims in such, there is a space-time.

Given the dimensions of XYZ = 1 cm ³ a spacial volume of geometrical points that is without any substance, i.e empty space

On examination of each individual point of the volume, the volume is without time.

My first challenge is for you/science to provide evidence that space-time exists in the given volume of space?

Quite obviously and axiom , space does not age and time is not relative to space. You are making it up Mr science, space-time is imaginary.

Not even a belief, an outright lie.

Empty space is not empty, i think Heisenberg predicted certain particles could randomly appear and disappear in otherwise "empty" space due to quantum fluctuations and I think this has been proven. Smarter people than me on this board could give you a more detailed answer though.

 

[james blunt]

Let me ask you this: That cubic centimeter of empty space that you spoke about; is it older now than it was when you wrote about it?

I have been observing the space around me now for approx 46 years, I have been timing it relative to me. The space as not aged or changed in 46 years.

 

[james blunt]

Empty space is not empty, i think Heisenberg predicted certain particles could randomly appear and disappear in otherwise "empty" space due to quantum fluctuations and I think this has been proven. Smarter people than me on this board could give you a more detailed answer though.

The question states empty space, there is no energy or particles in this space.

 

[Phantasman]

A science section is my home turf, objectively I am a genius.

Most of the world is under cognitive control when it comes to science and the subjective education they are forced to accept or fail.

In saying that , I will set a series of challenges in this thread to main stream science by use of my cognitive freedom.

Challenge 1

A point has 0 dimensions , specifically no dimension of time. Einstein and science claims in such, there is a space-time.

Given the dimensions of XYZ = 1 cm ³ a spacial volume of geometrical points that is without any substance, i.e empty space

On examination of each individual point of the volume, the volume is without time.

My first challenge is for you/science to provide evidence that space-time exists in the given volume of space?

Quite obviously and axiom , space does not age and time is not relative to space. You are making it up Mr science, space-time is imaginary.

Not even a belief, an outright lie.

How would you know? In a vacuum, as light passes through it, it is still under the physics rule of atomic decay. All physical elements are under this law. Time is nothing more than rate of decay of atomic structure.

If I put a toy inside the box, the RoD might drop to immeasurable levels, but it is still there.

"A perfect vacuum would be empty space with no atoms or any particles in it. But there is no such thing because virtual particles are always popping in and out of existence. Even "empty space" is seething with virtual particles"

Why is it impossible to have a perfect vacuum?

Your question may get a more definitive answer on this link.

 

[JoshuaTree]

The question states empty space, there is no energy or particles in this space.

Copy that. Quantum fluctuations "poof" stuff into existence. No space is empty. My limited understanding of the matter. I think the question is regarding a volume rather than a point correct?

 

[james blunt]

How would you know? In a complete vacuum, as light passes through it, it is still under the physics rule of atomic decay. All physical elements are under this law. Time is nothing more than rate of decay of atomic structure.

If I put a toy inside the box, the RoD might drop to immeasurable levels, but it is still there.

"A perfect vacuum would be empty space with no atoms or any particles in it. But there is no such thing because virtual particles are always popping in and out of existence. Even "empty space" is seething with virtual particles"

Why is it impossible to have a perfect vacuum?

You question may get a more definitive answer on this link.

That was a decent attempt of a defence, however everything you mention is independent of space and the question is about space and time which science says is interwoven. Obviously the independent space of space has no time, no age function, no timing function . They are axioms.

 

[Phantasman]

Dear Mr moderators, nearly every science forum on the internet has me banned and on watch list for how I hurt science. I have faith in you that you will protect me from the subjective warrior trolls who want cognitive control over the world and try to stop me almost everywhere I go.

Got tin foil?

 

[james blunt]

Copy that. Quantum fluctuations "poof" stuff into existence. No space is empty. My limited understanding of the matter. I think the question is regarding a volume rather than a point correct?

The question is about a volume of geometrical points. Examine each point of the volume and let me no if you can find any time dimension.

 

[james blunt]

Got tin foil?

That's a fact, I have a ''fan'' club that tries to close my threads. Science is in danger from me and they know it.

 

[Phantasman]

That was a decent attempt of a defence, however everything you mention is independent of space and the question is about space and time which science says is interwoven. Obviously the independent space of space has no time, no age function, no timing function . They are axioms.

Self evident truth (axioms) isn't necessarily truth. Which is why I said how would you know. You create an image of speculation. What if's> (the box) isn't truth.........yet.