• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

I have never lost an argument, try me

S

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
IamYourYahaweh said:
Well allow me to give you some facts and be open to learning for once. You presented me with an argument and I lost by failing to engage? If nobody engages on another side then it is not an argument. So nothing to lose, Maybe think about presenting a clear and concise argument and what side you're on, I could try and argue almost everything you just said but it's supposed to be one that you choose not me, don't run away now chicken
Click to expand...

Why are you calling me "Chicken" .. name calling is not an argument for much friend .. sans the inability of the name caller to make a valid argument .. thus losing.

Nor is Projection - strawman fallacy - a valid argument --- as it is you who is chicken -- refusing to engage and then running around claiing you won something on the basis of lack of participation .. because you are chicken to engage.

You were presented with a cear concise argument .. do you not know what an argument is ? This confirms my suspicions about not being taught Philosophy through 12 years of School .. and thus not knowing what an argument is . which explains also why you think you have never lost one.

You can not lose something you never had Brother YHWH .. and where was your debunking of the philosophical quote .. Referenced for your convenience. so you are now losing another argument .. on the basis of being too chicken to respond .. and a 3rd argument lost your projecting this personal failing onto others.

When it rains it pours friend .. like swatting at flies with a baseball bat ...
 
I

IamYourYahaweh

*Banned*
Sargonski said:
Ouch .. that's not a compliment friend :)
Click to expand...
Eye of the beholder, it's a worthwhile scene to make us both know it, and make many laugh and make light of things. I dont argue all day long or anything, just make posts like this and try to humble some people for fun sometimes
 
I

IamYourYahaweh

*Banned*
Sargonski said:
Why are you calling me "Chicken" .. name calling is not an argument for much friend .. sans the inability of the name caller to make a valid argument .. thus losing.

Nor is Projection - strawman fallacy - a valid argument --- as it is you who is chicken -- refusing to engage and then running around claiing you won something on the basis of lack of participation .. because you are chicken to engage.

You were presented with a cear concise argument .. do you not know what an argument is ? This confirms my suspicions about not being taught Philosophy through 12 years of School .. and thus not knowing what an argument is . which explains also why you think you have never lost one.

You can not lose something you never had Brother YHWH .. and where was your debunking of the philosophical quote .. Referenced for your convenience. so you are now losing another argument .. on the basis of being too chicken to respond .. and a 3rd argument lost your projecting this personal failing onto others.

When it rains it pours friend .. like swatting at flies with a baseball bat ...
Click to expand...
You always write so much and achieve so little. I still fail to see any concise clear argument or side. But you called me friend, I thought name calling is inappropriate, who is to say the label of chicken or friend is better or worse. Being your friend would be a worse life than a chicken I'd imagine. If you have to get taught philosophy then your brain probably isn't very good man I'm sorry. I didn't need to study dumb ego maniacs from history and the more current morons. Philosophy is a naturally occurring phenomenon for everybody at all times, keep running though friend
 
Hooded_Crow

Hooded_Crow

Taking flight
IamYourYahaweh said:
Why would you argue that, you don't know me or your yahweh. Also the fact you would argue it hints that maybe there is room for doubt on this bold statement. Although I know you're just trying to find an easy win
Click to expand...
Because you said: "You pick the argument and what side of it you want. Sky is blue and I argue otherwise, all up to you."
 
S

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
IamYourYahaweh said:
Eye of the beholder, it's a worthwhile scene to make us both know it, and make many laugh and make light of things. I dont argue all day long or anything, just make posts like this and try to humble some people for fun sometimes
Click to expand...

The eye of the beholder happens to be a friend .. and a good friend indeed is one who is not afraid to point out faults .. and humble of you to accept such criticism but, you expressed a desire to argue with John Cleese .. and you have been given that opportunity .. along with your request for a quote for a philosopher and promise to make them look dumb

"I drink therefor I am" - Philosopher song
 
S

Sargonski

Well-Known Member
IamYourYahaweh said:
You always write so much and achieve so little. I still fail to see any concise clear argument or side. But you called me friend, I thought name calling is inappropriate, who is to say the label of chicken or friend is better or worse. Being your friend would be a worse life than a chicken I'd imagine. If you have to get taught philosophy then your brain probably isn't very good man I'm sorry. I didn't need to study dumb ego maniacs from history and the more current morons. Philosophy is a naturally occurring phenomenon for everybody at all times, keep running though friend
Click to expand...

Look friend .. you run around crying "Chicken Chicken" when it is you that is Chicken to engage in an argument .. something you yourself admit .. but have this desire to project your failings on to others .. and pretend you have won something on that basis.

Now .. focus - The Philosopher Song "I drink therefor I am"

 
Revoltingest

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
IamYourYahaweh said:
Okay easy, you said your oven needs to be cleaned out... your oven as far as I'm aware is not conscious, it doesn't have needs and thoughts so speaking for your oven as if you know what it needs is weird imo
Click to expand...
I see how this works.

Claim:
I can't get out of a windowless doorless room that has only a table.
Argument:
Yes you can!
1) Look at the table.
2) You saw it.....so saw it in half.
3) Put it together to make a whole.
4) Take the "hole" from the "whole", & exit the room thru that.
 
Heyo

Heyo

Veteran Member
IamYourYahaweh said:
You pick the argument and what side of it you want. Sky is blue and I argue otherwise, all up to you. Good luck
Click to expand...
I'm game. But we have to set the rules first. Where, when, and most important, who decides who won.
My suggestions: One-On-One Debates, as soon as the details are decided with at least one post per day, winner is the one with the highest frubal count.
You're up?
 
I

IamYourYahaweh

*Banned*
Daemon Sophic said:
You, @IamYourYahaweh, are a very argumentative person. Prove me wrong.​
Click to expand...
Well you presented a creative scenario here all in order to have a smoking gun contradiction conundrum for me. If I argue you to win the argument then it proves your statement to look more truee that I am argumentative so by arguing whether I believe it is true or not I validate your point. If I choose to avoid the argument to not prove your point then I will be seen as someone walking away from an argument and losing. If you allow me to walk away and lose because I don't like arguing is the truth and not use it against me as a way to say you are right then I will do that. So now the tables have turned and we will see if it is you who is the real argumentative one
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top