Yeah. See, understanding analogies and pretending not to is not your manner. Don't do that.
Understanding, and relating to it are to different things. While I can understand the analogy I can't argue a position I can't relate to with any authenticity so I don't.
Why don't you engage with real, true to life arguments instead? "IF" God exists, you are just being like a spoilt child. An ungrateful one. A brat who has no value.
"IF" God does not exist, and that's what you wish to prove, you should have arguments to prove it. Not play at these type of little man arguments. You are more sophisticated than that.
Cheers.
That's the argument you want to have. Wrong thread for it though.