waitasec
Veteran Member
After browsing RF, I am not so sure.
ha ha
in order to progress there is tension and then there is release
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
After browsing RF, I am not so sure.
*edit*
Because thinking there's no god obviously means you want to murder people in the millions?
*edit*
David Duke? Really? Your best source is a Klanner?
Oh, well, the commies were bad.
Sure are you?No, no. Communism is good.
Indeed, Stephen. Now if only a group of people can implement this perfect ideology correctly, eh. Given that Communism totally ignores human nature, I'd say that that just ain't gonna happen - ever.No, no. Communism is good.
Indeed, Stephen. Now if only a group of people can implement this perfect ideology correctly, eh. Given that Communism totally ignores human nature, I'd say that that just ain't gonna happen - ever.
Modern views of human nature have been shaped to a depressing degree by the individual zealotry manifest in the madness of Reagan, both Bushes and Thatcher.
Communism does not ignore human nature - the psychology of Luria and Vygotsky are shining examples of the practical utility of a marxist psychology.
Soviet Russia was not a nirvana - but neither is capitalist Russia.
Inequality is a disaster. Look to Europe - all the bailout countries are also the most unequal societies.
Communism is good.
i'm not afraid of the idea of communism...
the only thing that bothers me about it is that it gives too much power to the few.....
If only you can find a way to force it upon people without their becoming revolting.....perhaps then it would stick.Communism is good.
If only you can find a way to force it upon people without their becoming revolting.....perhaps then it would stick.
If it does that then it's not communism
touche... :yes:
has there ever been a communist state where the tendency of giving power to the few didn't happen?
touche... :yes:
has there ever been a communist state where the tendency of giving power to the few didn't happen?
Say what? I'm sure there is a coherent idea nested in these words, but I am unable to parse it out.Modern views of human nature have been shaped to a depressing degree by the individual zealotry manifest in the madness of Reagan, both Bushes and Thatcher.
Marxist psychology? I'll try suppress my giggles.Communism does not ignore human nature - the psychology of Luria and Vygotsky are shining examples of the practical utility of a marxist psychology.
Like Cuba, like China, like North Korea... et al...Soviet Russia was not a nirvana - but neither is capitalist Russia.
Inequality is reality however much as that rankles some.Inequality is a disaster. Look to Europe - all the bailout countries are also the most unequal societies.
Communism is a failed, highly flawed ideology that should never have been taken seriously from the get go.Communism is good.
Marxist psychology? I'll try suppress my giggles.
And in the process display a complete ignorance of psychology as an academic subject.
Suppress away, I'm indifferent.
Communism is a failed, highly flawed ideology that should never have been taken seriously from the get go.
indeed.BTW I don't think there has ever been a modern democracy where that hasn't happened either.