i saw an equation in my dreams lastnight! opinions?

[Poeticus]

You are a moron...because you sleep deeply in the illusion of your reality. As i have for many many years. Welcome to the matrix. You just choose a different colored pill than i. So we simply see differently. Im done for now with this thread.

Ladybug, if that is truly how you feel, I'm sorry. I can't really offer anything of comfort. But, leave 0 alone. It's innocent. Stop hatin'. Meow!

 

[ladybug77]

The man that possesses three? Isn't that BOTH of them? Based on the following in the OP...

NO. One man possess three. The other man is left without. The non possession is -3. The possession is +3.




How?
10-20 only equals -10 if you include 0. Otherwise it equals -11.

you are right!!! It is -11! my bad....its -11 BECAUSE even though he is in the neg, he is capable of being positive again! And exceding his original amount!! So -10 is incomplete! A -10 simply states the zero is a representation of other 1's that can be applied!! So it IS -11!!!

BECAUSE YOU CANT HAVE SOMETHING FROM NOTHING! 0 CANT EXIST WITHOUT THE ONE. But 0 is a SYMBOL. NOT A NUMBER!!!THEREFORE IT DOES NOT GO ON A LINE THAT CONSISTS OF NUMBERS!!!!



Whatever we use in Australia, of course!! IN this case, celcius.


I'm not sure I can handle the pressue...lol

So 0.0 is staing that water can be 1.1, 1.2, 2.5, 6.8, and so on.

Strangly enough....that decimal. It represents ABSOLUTE ONE.

LOOK AT IT!!!!

0.0

The decimal is absolute one. (Hydrogen)
The two zeros....um...its an 'o' like in the alphabet!!! ( oxygen)

Zero is used as a number, when it shouldnt be. Its a freaking unknown.

So the decimal is one hydrogen...that split and made 2 oxygens. 0.0 <----hummm...looks like H20 to me. The exact freezing point of water will tell ya exactly what it contains on the molecular level...Interesting!!!

 

[Poeticus]

0.0

Yes, you are correct. 0.0 is a number. 0.0 = 0. Stop being intellectually backwards and claiming otherwise.

 

[ladybug77]

Yes, you are correct. 0.0 is a number. 0.0 = 0. Stop being intellectually backwards and claiming otherwise.

Look above you dum dum

 

[Poeticus]

Look above you dum dum

Look at this:

 

[ladybug77]

So 0.0 is staing that water can be 1.1, 1.2, 2.5, 6.8, and so on.

Strangly enough....that decimal. It represents ABSOLUTE ONE.

LOOK AT IT!!!!

0.0

The decimal is absolute one. (Hydrogen)
The two zeros....um...its an 'o' like in the alphabet!!! ( oxygen)

Zero is used as a number, when it shouldnt be. Its a freaking unknown.

So the decimal is one hydrogen...that split and made 2 oxygens. 0.0 <----hummm...looks like H20 to me. The exact freezing point of water will tell ya exactly what it contains on the molecular level...Interesting!!!

With this said: . (That dot) is NOT a decimal! its absolute ONE. No decimals, no fractions. No fractions, no part or ANY whole, EXCEPT ONE.

-1+1 =1
One nuetron, plus one proton....equals a ???
A NEGATIVE AND A POSITIVE EQUALS A POSITIVE.

Um hellooooo!!!!! Wakey wakey!

 

[ladybug77]

Look at this:

Apply SCIENCE!!!! TO MATH!!!!!

Science states that one negative nuetron, plus one positive proton= ???? POSITIVE!!!!
NO ZERO....NOT NOTHING....BUT A FREAKING POSITIVE.

Now tell me if you can effectively explain a hydrogen atom using your number line!
It doesnt work!!
Now use it without the zero!

Its right, old way is wrong. It all fits together now. Your welcome.

 

[crossfire]

With this said: . (That dot) is NOT a decimal! its absolute ONE. No decimals, no fractions. No fractions, no part or ANY whole, EXCEPT ONE.

-1+1 =1
One nuetron, plus one proton....equals a ???
A NEGATIVE AND A POSITIVE EQUALS A POSITIVE.

Um hellooooo!!!!! Wakey wakey!

Except that a neutron has a neutral charge, not a negative charge. (It's the electrons that have the negative charge.)

 

[Poeticus]

Apply SCIENCE!!!! TO MATH!!!!!

Science states that one negative nuetron, plus one positive proton= ???? POSITIVE!!!!
NO ZERO....NOT NOTHING....BUT A FREAKING POSITIVE.

Now tell me if you can effectively explain a hydrogen atom using your number line!
It doesnt work!!
Now use it without the zero!

Its right, old way is wrong. It all fits together now. Your welcome.

You are combining two fields unnecessarily. It doesn't involve science when it comes to solving: -5+5=0. Why does that fly over your head? And, a neutron doesn't have a negative charge, silly.

 

[mycorrhiza]

Apply SCIENCE!!!! TO MATH!!!!!

Science states that one negative nuetron, plus one positive proton= ???? POSITIVE!!!!
NO ZERO....NOT NOTHING....BUT A FREAKING POSITIVE.

Now tell me if you can effectively explain a hydrogen atom using your number line!
It doesnt work!!
Now use it without the zero!

Its right, old way is wrong. It all fits together now. Your welcome.

Neutrons aren't negative. They lack polarity. Which means that you cannot reverse the polarity of the neutron flow .

 

[ladybug77]

You are combining two fields unnecessarily. It doesn't involve science when it comes to solving: -5+5=0. Why does that fly over your head? And, a neutron doesn't have a negative charge, silly.

You are so correct!!!! We came up with math first!!! Not science!!! So our math was wrong...and we never understood science correctly.

Now that we DO UNDERSTAND SCIENCE. ...we realize....OPPS...OUR MATH WAS WRONG.

 

[Poeticus]

Neutrons aren't negative. They lack polarity. Which means that you cannot reverse the polarity of the neutron flow .

 

[ladybug77]

Neutrons aren't negative. They lack polarity. Which means that you cannot reverse the polarity of the neutron flow .

They lack a positive charge?? So in math, we represent that as a negative. New number line stands firm.

 

[Poeticus]

Apply SCIENCE!!!! TO MATH!!!!!

Science states that one negative nuetron, plus one positive proton= ???? POSITIVE!!!!
NO ZERO....NOT NOTHING....BUT A FREAKING POSITIVE.

Now tell me if you can effectively explain a hydrogen atom using your number line!
It doesnt work!!
Now use it without the zero!

Its right, old way is wrong. It all fits together now. Your welcome.

 

[lewisnotmiller]

You're changing the rules! Originally you said 50 x 0 = 50.
Now 3 x 0 = -3 due to the absence of 1 in each box (group).
Your dream could only have supported one version of the truth, surely??

Your 0 can't exist without 1 premise is interesting, actually. It was originally invented as a way of indicating a lack of a particular unit type (eg. there aren't any 1's, there aren't any tens, etc) so the concept really was originated as a way of denying something's presence.

But ya lost me again with the 0.0 stuff. 0.0 is zero. 1/10 less than 0.1 and 1/10 more than -0.1.
And in terms of indicating it's molecular structure, two oxygens atoms is dioxygen. Not water. Surmising that the decimal point represents hydrogen is kinda a bridge too far. And splitting hydrogen doesn't result in water. Hydrogen is the simplest of elements, and only theoretically possible to split. As far as I know, it's never been done, although perhaps in a particle accelerator? Not really my bag, to be honest.

You'd basically be splitting the (single) proton into quarks I guess.

 

[ladybug77]

Nuetral is not zero its ABSOLUTE ONE.

 

[Poeticus]

Nuetral is not zero its ABSOLUTE ONE.

It's "no charge", O' smart one.

 

[Poeticus]

You're changing the rules! Originally you said 50 x 0 = 50.
Now 3 x 0 = -3 due to the absence of 1 in each box (group).
Your dream could only have supported one version of the truth, surely??

Your 0 can't exist without 1 premise is interesting, actually. It was originally invented as a way of indicating a lack of a particular unit type (eg. there aren't any 1's, there aren't any tens, etc) so the concept really was originated as a way of denying something's presence.

But ya lost me again with the 0.0 stuff. 0.0 is zero. 1/10 less than 0.1 and 1/10 more than -0.1.
And in terms of indicating it's molecular structure, two oxygens atoms is dioxygen. Not water. Surmising that the decimal point represents hydrogen is kinda a bridge too far. And splitting hydrogen doesn't result in water. Hydrogen is the simplest of elements, and only theoretically possible to split. As far as I know, it's never been done, although perhaps in a particle accelerator? Not really my bag, to be honest.

You'd basically be splitting the (single) proton into quarks I guess.

You forgot to mention one thing: this thread is an embarrassment to RF, a stain non-washable, a perversion so severe that it begs ridicule.

 

[mycorrhiza]

They lack a positive charge?? So in math, we represent that as a negative. New number line stands firm.

Nope. Lacking positive =/= negative. They can be represented by a 0, a neutral number that is neither positive nor negative.

No matter how many neutrons you add, you wont get a more negative charge.

Since you claim to be bad at math, maybe you should trust the mathematicians, programmers and chemists when they talk about neutrality and the number 0. If your system was better, surely it would be used instead of the current system.

 

[lewisnotmiller]

You forgot to mention one thing: this thread is an embarrassment to RF, a stain non-washable, a perversion so severe that it begs ridicule.

Nah...it's fun.
Just in the wrong section is all.

*tweaks nose*