• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

i saw an equation in my dreams lastnight! opinions?

lewisnotmiller

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
mycorrhiza said:
Nope. Lacking positive =/= negative. They can be represented by a 0, a neutral number that is neither positive nor negative.

No matter how many neutrons you add, you wont get a more negative charge.

Since you claim to be bad at math, maybe you should trust the mathematicians, programmers and chemists when they talk about neutrality and the number 0. If your system was better, surely it would be used instead of the current system.
Click to expand...

It kinda was used...or at least, a version of it. It sucked ****, so they invented zero, and things like calculus started to work, and we invented computers. I skipped a few thousand years in that summary, but you get the drift.
But I've seen plenty of revisionist history on this site. At least this version is keeping me amused while I'm away from my family...lol
 
lewisnotmiller

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
मैत्रावरुणिः;3571329 said:
I'll have to agree with the above. This thread does keep me amused. Yessir. But, she does throw some yorkers that defy projection. <--- yes, finally a Cricket pun! Hehe.
Click to expand...

Certainly the odd wrong 'un. But what are you gonna do? It's not like we can just bowl the maiden over.

:sorry1:
 
Poeticus

Poeticus

| abhyAvartin |
lewisnotmiller said:
Certainly the odd wrong 'un. But what are you gonna do? It's not like we can just bowl the maiden over.

:sorry1:
Click to expand...

True. We can't do anything. Especially when she keeps stepping over the crease, bowling no-balls after no-balls. Even when the cameras show her, her follies. :p
 
L

ladybug77

Active Member
&#2350;&#2376;&#2340;&#2381;&#2352;&#2366;&#2357;&#2352;&#2369;&#2339;&#2367;&#2307;;3571355 said:
She's basically making all these posts to indirectly express the following:



It all makes sense now. Not her posts, but why she is making these posts. Poor zero had to bear all the burden. :sad4:
Click to expand...

Basically...this whole time we have been referring to God as absolute nothing. When he is absolute ONE.
 
F

FranklinMichaelV.3

Well-Known Member
ladybug77 said:
Basically...this whole time we have been referring to God as absolute nothing. When he is absolute ONE.
Click to expand...

Why is it that even after you take God and describe it as something that means "absolute one" which I'm going to assume is like absolute vodka but better...you still refer to God as he?
 
crossfire

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic Bully ☿
Premium Member
FranklinMichaelV.3 said:
Why is it that even after you take God and describe it as something that means "absolute one" which I'm going to assume is like absolute vodka but better...you still refer to God as he?
Click to expand...
"Absolute" usually means there is no more room for discussion: aka: "shut up!"

I've never heard anything near resembling "shut up" in connection to Absolut Vodka, so I would say Absolut Vodka is better. :yes:
 
Kilgore Trout

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
in related news, we should no longer use the number "6." Going forward, it should be replaced with a hot apple pie. Math is finally fixed.
 
crossfire

crossfire

LHP Mercuræn Feminist Heretic Bully ☿
Premium Member
Kilgore Trout said:
in related news, we should no longer use the number "6." Going forward, it should be replaced with a hot apple pie. Math is finally fixed.
Click to expand...
As you wish....
1194986858374627801discordian_sacred_chao_01r.svg.med.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top