Poeticus
| abhyAvartin |
You are literally, border-line trolling.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
i saw an equation in my dreams lastnight! opinions?
- Thread starter ladybug77
- Start date
You are literally, border-line trolling.
Gjallarhorn
N'yog-Sothep
मैत्रावरुणिः;3568303 said:
You're such an optimist.
Poeticus
| abhyAvartin |
What should I have said, instead? That this thread is a crime against thread-making?
Kilgore Trout
Misanthropic Humanist
I've taken this radical idea even further. The only number that really exists is one. If I have 1111 things and add 111 things to it, then I have 1111111 things. All other digits are not only extraneous, but also blasphemy in the face of True mathematics. 1 is all that exists!
Poeticus
| abhyAvartin |
No. I'm right. You're wrong. I'm using your own form of reasoning here.
Lo! Behold! The New Mathematical Commandment! :bow:
Oh, the ghost of the pencil haunting you?
I can understand your concept of 1 signifying individuality. I can also understand your having -1 pencil as clinging to the past concept of a pencil that you no longer have.
Blinding flash of the obvious here: just as one is a concept, zero is also a concept.
{Form is emptiness, and emptiness is form.
}
Thank you for analyzing before you disgarded this truth.
You can :run:but you can't hide.
Kilgore Trout
Misanthropic Humanist
111 11111 111! 1 11 1111 11 11111!!!!!!
Gjallarhorn
N'yog-Sothep
मैत्रावरुणिः;3568308 said:What should I have said, instead? That this thread is a crime against thread-making?
You're an optimist for assuming she's not a believer.
Sadly I don't share in your optimism.
Kilgore Trout
Misanthropic Humanist
In related news, we had something else wrong all along - the letter "e" should be replaced with the letter "w" wherever it appears.
(Correction listed below)
In rwlatwd nwws, ww had somwthing wlsw wrong all along - thw lwttwr "w" should bw rwplacwd with thw lwttwr "w" whwrwvwr it appwars.
(Correction listed below)
In rwlatwd nwws, ww had somwthing wlsw wrong all along - thw lwttwr "w" should bw rwplacwd with thw lwttwr "w" whwrwvwr it appwars.
Not a believer? Of what?
The Nature and Meaning of Numbers (page 21 on)
I know you get it. Dont stray just because others dont know the truth.
Gjallarhorn
N'yog-Sothep
Not far enough.
"Wix a laud-yelid kumand, hy lypid tu xe slipery dek uv xe submirsibul, and at hiz hylin kumid hiz haardy krw."
Kilgore Trout
Misanthropic Humanist
I don't comprwhwnd what you'rw saying with all thosw wxtranwous "e's" is your swntwncw. Plwasw bw surw to usw the corrwct lwttwrs whwn writing.
**sprays Lysol around all over this thread**
Argh! It looks the babble (or Babel, depending upon your frame of reference) effect might be contagious! :run: