Shouldn't that be two pi?
But if 6 = two pi, then the pie would look like this:
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
i saw an equation in my dreams lastnight! opinions?
- Thread starter ladybug77
- Start date
But if 6 = two pi, then the pie would look like this:
Shouldn't that be two pi?
Let's see now, if 6=2pi, and is replaced with "hot apple pie" symbol, and "hot" = radioactive, then 6 is now replaced by this:
ResistETIntervention
Active Member
मैत्रावरुणिः;3571187 said:
a² - ab is zero, according to your assumption in the first line a = b. You cannot divide by zero.
Poeticus
| abhyAvartin |
It's a pseudo-proof for a reason, buddy.
ResistETIntervention
Active Member
Actually, since 0 doesn't exist in this thread, you cannot divide by what doesn't exist. Since zero, according to the OP, is merely a symbol, there should be a hole in your number line.मैत्रावरुणिः;3571843 said:
Poeticus
| abhyAvartin |
Kilgore Trout
Misanthropic Humanist
No, she says that 0 should be replaced with -1, so he should divide each side by -1, thereby validating his proof that 2=1.
Poeticus
| abhyAvartin |
It's not my proof, though, brahhh.
I actually came across it here on RF a while back, originally posted by Skwim, if me remembers correctly ^_^ ; it was the first time I had seen that "proof" after a few years of not encountering it since high school, thereby quickly saving Skwim's post. But, I love creative proofs like that.
Kilgore Trout
Misanthropic Humanist
मैत्रावरुणिः;3571937 said:It's not my proof, though, brahhh.
Meh, once you steal something, it becomes yours. This is a priceless tip for those who want to venture into the business world.
Poeticus
| abhyAvartin |
Lmao. So true.
मैत्रावरुणिः;3571937 said:But, I love creative proofs like that.
They are great and they are great for instruction too. I used to teach test prep classes for tests like the SATs/GREs. The math sections of these tests don't really test knowledge. The SATs, which is for juniors and seniors in high school (students who are frequently taking calculus, but all of whom have had something like algebra II, precalc, or trig), doesn't have anything really more advanced than basic algebra. There's no trig, no complex numbers, and about the most mathematically complicated a problem will get involves expressions or equations you'd probably see in a algebra 1 book. However, the questions do get so difficult that I've used them tutoring undergrads in mathematics. That's because they test not how well you can apply rote procedures to return an answer but how well you really understand the logic behind the ways a problem is solved. Standardized tests, however, are limited due to format. I wasn't. So I would give "proofs" that 2=1 or some such thing to make students think about what operations in algebra actually mean.
If
a=b
then
Curious George
Veteran Member
So are you saying that if we reject logic and reality, concepts like 2=1 or YHWH make sense?
Only if we replace it with the complete mathematical system Kurt Gödel, the one who proved there is no such system, said that God has.
No, we reject the zero as a number, and it all falls in to place.
Kilgore Trout
Misanthropic Humanist
Or, we can reject your nonsense, and everything is already in place.
PolyHedral
Superabacus Mystic
If you reject zero, you also reject negative numbers. Now what?
sandy whitelinger
Veteran Member
......in the numeric value system zero is a number. You are trying to equate zero to an actual item in existence yet as a number zero stands for something not in existence. Nonetheless it is a number and has properties.
sandy whitelinger
Veteran Member
Since E=mc(squared) and all atoms and their constuents are mass then if you look at it as energy then is there just one energy?Do more research!! Im not kidding...its all about the atom. You will find answers.
Everything can be explained with the most simple of the simple. The origin is not complex.
We just became that way the smaller and further away we became from the 1 simple truth.
It actually IS one atom split a butt-load of times! All individual atoms, that actually where split from one. Research it. It wont fail you.
By the way the word: 'conscience' means 'with science'.
sandy whitelinger
Veteran Member
Goggles won't help.
sandy whitelinger
Veteran Member
There was a movie once, "The story of O."मैत्रावरुणिः;3571130 said: