WalterTrull
Godfella
I guess you're going to have to tell me. With multiple translations, I'm afraid I just go with the major pointsYou did not notice even one detail in the snake story that does not ring true?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I guess you're going to have to tell me. With multiple translations, I'm afraid I just go with the major pointsYou did not notice even one detail in the snake story that does not ring true?
I guess you're going to have to tell me. With multiple translations, I'm afraid I just go with the major points
Don't you choose what evidence to believe? which observations are legitimate?
Emm. There's an ultimatum. You have to have faith. He healed the leaper and raised the dead "because" they had faith on his father. I usually think of good people doing things for others despite their differences. You think jesus would help a satanist?
Yes I think so. He would give him the shortcut to satan.
I think he meant Jesus WOULDN'T heal the satanist, and let him die... that way he'd be along to Satan (hell) more quickly - supposed as the more favorable outcome for the satanist.Hm? Went over my head. Heal him to go straight to himself?
Yeah, Maybe. These folks thinks it's the wrong island. Maybe, I don't know. It's just not an important incident to my beliefs.You do know there are no poisonous snakes on that island?
I dunno. "Heal the sick, cleanse the lepers, raise the dead, cast out devils" Seems like pretty positive stuff to me.
Emm. There's an ultimatum. You have to have faith. He healed the leaper and raised the dead "because" they had faith on his father. I usually think of good people doing things for others despite their differences. You think jesus would help a satanist?
Yes I think so. He would give him the shortcut to satan.
Hm? Went over my head. Heal him to go straight to himself?
You read my mind quite well. Jesus is all about respect, so no healing.I think he meant Jesus WOULDN'T heal the satanist, and let him die... that way he'd be along to Satan (hell) more quickly - supposed as the more favorable outcome for the satanist.
In that light, Jesus probably welcomed satanists - they gave him a chance to take a break from the tiresome work of miracle-making.
John 14:6
It gets quoted alot by sort of fundie Christians to explain why Christianity, and ONLY Christianity is saved.
Isn't that interesting though.
2 Kings 2:5-12 Elijah is taken directly to Heaven
Genesis 5:24 and Hebrews 11:5 both seem to say that Enoch got taken by God
So these people came to Heaven with God, yet somehow they weren't saved?
For that matter all of the other OT leaders such as Moses, Abraham, and the like, also not saved apparently.
Is it possible we misread this?
Let's get a few more quotes before declaring that only those who belong to the Christian fanclub are saved:
Matthew 19:23-26
Not Christianity. Not even Jesus. God is the one to save us.
Hold up, before Jesus said nobody comes to the father except through him. Is this a contradiction?
Not really. Jesus also says in John 10:30 "I and the Father are one."
So, something's going on other than what we've led to believe. From what we have here, unlike many religions it does not appear that membership is actually the key point. So what is?
Belief in Jesus? Or for that matter, following the path of Jesus? (I mean, Muslims say they believe Jesus was a person, but they certainly don't follow his path)
Belief in God? (That would effectively save Christians, Jews, and probably Hindus)
Belief in some sort of concept, like grace? (That might effectively save even atheists)
Or is it more important to simply be a member of the Christian fanclub called the church, even if you don't actually strongly believe in Jesus or God, and are basically a nihilist? Is simply being baptised enough for salvation?
Thoughts?
Yeah, Maybe. These folks thinks it's the wrong island. Maybe, I don't know. It's just not an important incident to my beliefs.
I don't think anyone "knows". There are all kinds of claims. I suppose I could believe the snake story if I wanted, but it would be a sort of "iffy" belief now. Actually, while I guess I'd heard about this before, I'd never bothered to research it, because it just wasn't that important. I'm sure the bible, along with innumerable ancient writings, have many embellishments, and probably a few outright fabrications. The "gist" of the accounts, however, along with current scientific claims and personal observations, lead me to my present philosophy. I notice the tape, but if it's not on my door, I might mention it to someone else or leave a note, but then I'll just move on.Could it be you actually dont want to know that?
First...... The Word who became Christ is the "God" who has always dealt with men. He has always gone forth from the Father -as Melchizedek, I AM, Christ, etc. -and it was his back parts of his glorious body that Moses saw. So -all have always been called to the Father through the being who became Christ.John 14:6
It gets quoted alot by sort of fundie Christians to explain why Christianity, and ONLY Christianity is saved.
Isn't that interesting though.
2 Kings 2:5-12 Elijah is taken directly to Heaven
Genesis 5:24 and Hebrews 11:5 both seem to say that Enoch got taken by God
So these people came to Heaven with God, yet somehow they weren't saved?
For that matter all of the other OT leaders such as Moses, Abraham, and the like, also not saved apparently.
Is it possible we misread this?
Let's get a few more quotes before declaring that only those who belong to the Christian fanclub are saved:
Matthew 19:23-26
Not Christianity. Not even Jesus. God is the one to save us.
Hold up, before Jesus said nobody comes to the father except through him. Is this a contradiction?
Not really. Jesus also says in John 10:30 "I and the Father are one."
So, something's going on other than what we've led to believe. From what we have here, unlike many religions it does not appear that membership is actually the key point. So what is?
Belief in Jesus? Or for that matter, following the path of Jesus? (I mean, Muslims say they believe Jesus was a person, but they certainly don't follow his path)
Belief in God? (That would effectively save Christians, Jews, and probably Hindus)
Belief in some sort of concept, like grace? (That might effectively save even atheists)
Or is it more important to simply be a member of the Christian fanclub called the church, even if you don't actually strongly believe in Jesus or God, and are basically a nihilist? Is simply being baptised enough for salvation?
Thoughts?
I don't think anyone "knows". There are all kinds of claims. I suppose I could believe the snake story if I wanted, but it would be a sort of "iffy" belief now. Actually, while I guess I'd heard about this before, I'd never bothered to research it, because it just wasn't that important. I'm sure the bible, along with innumerable ancient writings, have many embellishments, and probably a few outright fabrications. The "gist" of the accounts, however, along with current scientific claims and personal observations, lead me to my present philosophy. I notice the tape, but if it's not on my door, I might mention it to someone else or leave a note, but then I'll just move on.
I think that Jesus saves whomever he wills. I personally believe that this means everyone, given his other teachings, but even if you aren't a universalist, I've never understood any perspective which says salvation is only for members of a Super Special Club. If salvation is purely by the will of one who while we were yet sinners voluntarily took flesh and died for our sakes, that makes me feel good about our collective prospects. So what if one only enters the Kingdom of Heaven through Christ? Christ loves all, and is in all, and is a very present refuge in all troubles. He is not hard to find. He finds you.John 14:6
It gets quoted alot by sort of fundie Christians to explain why Christianity, and ONLY Christianity is saved.
Isn't that interesting though.
2 Kings 2:5-12 Elijah is taken directly to Heaven
Genesis 5:24 and Hebrews 11:5 both seem to say that Enoch got taken by God
So these people came to Heaven with God, yet somehow they weren't saved?
For that matter all of the other OT leaders such as Moses, Abraham, and the like, also not saved apparently.
Is it possible we misread this?
Let's get a few more quotes before declaring that only those who belong to the Christian fanclub are saved:
Matthew 19:23-26
Not Christianity. Not even Jesus. God is the one to save us.
Hold up, before Jesus said nobody comes to the father except through him. Is this a contradiction?
Not really. Jesus also says in John 10:30 "I and the Father are one."
So, something's going on other than what we've led to believe. From what we have here, unlike many religions it does not appear that membership is actually the key point. So what is?
Belief in Jesus? Or for that matter, following the path of Jesus? (I mean, Muslims say they believe Jesus was a person, but they certainly don't follow his path)
Belief in God? (That would effectively save Christians, Jews, and probably Hindus)
Belief in some sort of concept, like grace? (That might effectively save even atheists)
Or is it more important to simply be a member of the Christian fanclub called the church, even if you don't actually strongly believe in Jesus or God, and are basically a nihilist? Is simply being baptised enough for salvation?
Thoughts?
To get anywhere, you have to choose a direction, even if you're not sure about it.I cannot comprehend how you or anyone could say that they would believe if if they wanted to.
I think the creation metaphor is interesting. Days are obviously not our days. I think they are levels, stages of creation. Equating to our concept of time doesn't work very well. Each phase could last millions of years or seconds. I like the flood metaphor, although I certainly haven't deciphered all of it. The difference between clean and unclean beasts is interesting.The 6 day poof, the flood and
some several others absolutely do not. Fanciful tales.
The "gist" is that the universe is mental.What "gist" is there to believe in?
Possibly. The robbery itself wasn't all that big a deal. The big deal was Nixon lying under oath.I guess left to you, the Watergate burglars would have gotten away with it?
To get anywhere, you have to choose a direction, even if you're not sure about it.
I think the creation metaphor is interesting. Days are obviously not our days. I think they are levels, stages of creation. Equating to our concept of time doesn't work very well. Each phase could last millions of years or seconds. I like the flood metaphor, although I certainly haven't deciphered all of it. The difference between clean and unclean beasts is interesting.
The "gist" is that the universe is mental.
Possibly. The robbery itself wasn't all that big a deal. The big deal was Nixon lying under oath.
"The universe is mental"? huh?
Investigating a claim or event, being open to
discovery, that is great! Of course one is not sure. That is why we investigate. To find out.
Not just "choose" an answer, no heed to whether it is the right choice.
If you dont care if nothing in the bible is actually true other than where identifies real people and places, why bother with it at all?
Not sure I follow the above.
The bible is a collection of many different writings, by many different people. Some of the histories I just can’t wade through. I don’t know if they are accurate or not. I find metaphorical truth in quite a few of the passages though. Others, I don’t understand at all. I do find a central theme or truth that I appreciate.
The point, for me, is that if one glosses over things esp ones that seem wrong or out of place, you do not discover what lies behind them, which in some cases are real important.