I can tell that this test is completely bogus just from the first question - there's no option for an evil, personal God that didn't actually create the world but rather stole the credit from it. There's also no option to distinguish subpersonalities of God, the main three being the Dark Lord Yahweh ("God"), his false prophet ("Jesus"), and his demon, the Holy Spirit.
It's definitely slanted toward certain perspectives. I haven't been able to see what distinction, if any, it makes between Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox, it lumps all Hindus together, it lumps all Mahayana Buddhists together, and it either ignores Vajrayana or lumps it in with Mahayana. Meanwhile, it makes a distinction between "Orthodox" and "Liberal" Quakers, and while I agree with the distinction if not the terminology, it just underlines the extent to which the quiz focuses on Christian and Post-Christian religions.
I think it's fun anyway.
I went ahead and took it again, since I haven't taken it in a while and my results always vary from time to time. I got ten results with over 50%:
1. Unitarian Universalism (100%)
2. Secular Humanism (87%)
3. Liberal Quakers (84%)
4. Theravada Buddhism (82%)
5. Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestants (66%)
6. Neo-Pagan (65%)
7. Taoism (63%)
8. Nontheist (61%)
9. Mahayana Buddhism (60%)
10. New Age (52%)
Which is kind of funny, because we've been talking about visiting a UU Church. John has no interest in going to meditation classes with me, but he's willing to go to UU services and Quaker meetings. I want to get involved in Buddhist groups, and I'm probably going to do that on my own, and we'll see if the UU thing works out for us to do together. Either that, or it's back to the Quaker meeting, because John doesn't share my love of sleeping in on Sunday, so we're going to have to do something.