OK, the objective approach:
Pandor said Pretoria believes Israel should be classified as an apartheid state and that the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) should establish a committee to verify whether it satisfies the requirements.
How is that objective? It starts with "believe". The former defense minister "believes" that it isn't an apartheid state and legal texts support that. Once you reject the legal definition and start mving from law to belief, you lose objectivity.
I did not define, i observed the integrity of the religion!
You made statements about what Judaism IS. That means you are trying to define it. Are you denying that you made those declarations? Need I quote you back to yourself?
Have you ever even read torah? If you have then comprehending that personal responsibility is key to why g-d preferred some over the other is without a doubt.
Seriously, you shouldn't be trying to match up with me in terms of knowledge of Judaism. It is a really bad idea.
parents teach they children PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. If you do not comprehend that, then let's agree to disagree and you can be the dross of tanakh and just prepare to live in your hole.
Making things up does not help your cause.
But your not trust worthy and prove it at most every post
But if I prove it then I must be trustworthy. You just logic-ed yourself into a corner.
I am writing in english and you lack the comprehension of what even personal responsibility means.
Here's some English: "actual departmentalability". Do you know what it means? Just sticking two words in English together doesn't necessarily make for a comprehensible concept.
I dont understand the obtuse and how a person can be so rude with arrogance.
I'm not the one claiming to speak for a religion I am not part of.
waqf. Read the UN res 181 and look up the term hashemite and waqf. Neither require judaism to be understood.
Do you know why the waqf controls the temple mount? Do you understand how the hashemite kingdom was turned into Jordan? Clearly not.
Joke post (JPost) has a group of very biased, rude and arrogant sob's writing the content. NO, i have no interest in observing their opinions.
Or the facts they present apparently.
So you hate Jews for not accepting your narrative? Your comment is trying to condemn jews for being honest?
Where did I say i hate Jews? And why do you decide that those jews who say what you like are, by definition, honest? And what does their being jewish have to do with anything? You are very confused.
Israel, the apartheid; using the label of Jewish has caused more damage to jews worldwide, than anything since ww2.
What a weird statement. Not only is it grammatically confused, but it isn't saying anything that makes any sense.
I just watched you use that lack of integrity to attack me.
What lack of integrity? I pointed out that you don't understand Judaism. Are you trying to play the victim by being proud of what you don't know?
I write that because I comprehend the dialogue of torah.
LOL! You can't even read it.
When you read it you will learn why judaism is one of the best religions and impose the integrity of requiring personal responsibility
More stuff you don't know about Judaism.
OK.... the dross are not the Jew, the dross are directly identified as israel............ as written in tanakh, the prophets of jewish literature.
You don't understand the written text let alone the complementary ones. You just like writing the word "dross."
Are you trying to create something to discredit me?
you don't need my help on that front.