Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
There is that bait again.
You say so without knowing the law. Noted.
Doesn't respond to your own internal contradiction.
No, find an error to show that someone doesn't understand the law or the religion.
Then you aren't reading your own statements.
No, it isn't.
That same silliness still doesn't make any sense.
I note you didn't answer what I asked. Thanks.
because you can't answer what I said.
Wow. You say so little when you say so little, and yet it is still wrong. Amazing.
of your ignorance, yes.
I know the verse and the actual reference (it refers only to a specific group). I also know that if you wanted to claim that it applied now, then you would have to explain why there are Israelis outside of Jerusalem that you call "dross." The verses say that the dross will be assembled in Jerusalem.
either you understand things or you don't. Your posts make it clear you don't. That isn't bait. That is an observation based on what you write and how you can't defend it.
The unlawful appropriation of property by an occupying power amounts to “pillage”, which is prohibited by both the Hague Regulations and Fourth Geneva Convention and is a war crime under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and many national laws.
Apartheid defenders, that oppress widows and the fatherless. Its in writting, try reading the dialogue to learn.
No i do not have to explain.
Who can defend themselves from the dross?
so you didn't read the actual legal discussion I presented. and think that bigger font means something. It doesn't.
No apartheid and you clearly don't understand the biblical text. Would you like to discuss it with me? I'll quote something important to you (and put it in bold to help you out):
Especially when you don't understand.
Then you don't understand the verses.
I know the law and why it doesn't apply. You should study it instead of referencing what you don't understand.
Your entire argument seems to be that no one "understands" anything. I understand this: wanton killing is wrong, no matter what it is in response to.On what basis do you tell me who I am or what I know?
I don't. This wasn't my position.
You are quoting the Hamas chant and asking about Israelis. You are very confused.
lol
ah, so anyone who gives me a statement you think isn't what a Zionist should say, that person isn't a Zionist? HA!
Zionism predates 1948 by a lot.
You don't understand Judaism, Zionism, history or much of anything. It might be easier to make a list of things you do understand. When I find something, I'll add it to that list.
Deconstructing the Three Stages of the Nakba Myth
Nakba Day has become the most actively performed ritual of the Palestinian myth - Deconstructing the Three Stages of the Nakba Myth - Shmuel Triganojcpa.org
Because you do not accept or use laws, commandments or personal responsibility as your guidance of right and wrong.
Thanks for sidetracking.
Sure i do. but like the laws written condemning atrocities. Your solidarity with israel is in full force.
Only he & those who agree with him understand.
I understand that the use of the word "wanton" is a judgment that you make and different people might apply that word differently.
Because you don't understand the laws and commandments you label things in order to comfort yourself.
I do prefer legal opinions when it comes to discussing law. You seem averse.
You mean thanks for actually posting the text that you don't understand. You're welcome.
Clearly, you don't understand the text. I posted it and you (you, who had quoted the same text but in translation and sullied with your personal interpretation) can't read it so you call it sidetracking.
yeah, only Jews who have studied Judaism understand, and only people who are using legal terms and definitions understand legal discussions. If you would rather use words to mean whatever you want, and you want to make claims about a religion you don't really "get" then you can feel free to do that. I'll stick with substantive discussions based in actual facts.
Are there different laws and commandments for you than everyone else? Be specific.
Of course, so you can substantiate apartheid and genocide.
No thanks for giving me your legal opinion to circumvent liability and prophecy.
I posted the laws against illegal occupation. No matter the language, they apply.
I don't understand what that is about,
"everyone"? No. There are ones that different from those given to non-Jews. There are those that are resident in other countries. There are those that apply only in my building, at my job, and in my neighborhood that are different. What are you asking?
Swing and a miss. I can use the law to substantiate what ISN'T apartheid and genocide.
So when confronted with the actual law, you would prefer to hide behind your personal interpretation of the bible. OK.
No, you see, that's exactly the point. If you knew the law you'd know they DON'T apply.
I used the law and you concede that when it comes to law, you reject it in deference to your vision of biblical meaning. Thanks for clarifying your position about actual laws and how they don't matter.
Yep, mankind are equally capable to keep the commandments and laws of civil society.
I see the difference; you dont follow the commandments of bible/torah. I can witness that the dross had a problem and now you sustain that they use a completely different set of commandments. Thanks for educating me, that the dross do not follow the commandments. I have had a hard time with understanding why the harsh condemnation by ezekiel 22.
10 commandments of Moses are 'THE commandments.' I dont listen to the rabbi'd that enable the dross/israelis to keep an apartheid.
But israel is an apartheid as reflected in legal opinion. I have no consideration to learn the dross/israeli opinion.
Personal.......? Defending Jews from people that are trying to condemn them as Israeli is personal.
Laws against illegal occupation by UN and civil society are the law. The commandments do not conflict with the law, they are about personal responsibility. Huge difference!
Funny how you are being found incorrect and still falsely accuse, breaking the commandments. You prove my point very consistently.
Mate, are you arguing with a Jew about Judaism?
I defend Jews and Judaism and I have very consistently.