rosends
Well-Known Member
yeah...that word gets thrown around by all sorts of fools in all sorts of inappropriate contexts.A site that sides with Russia in calling Ukraine "Nazi"?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
yeah...that word gets thrown around by all sorts of fools in all sorts of inappropriate contexts.A site that sides with Russia in calling Ukraine "Nazi"?
There were no Amalekite towns. Why didn't you also mention "cows"?There was no disagreement in your discussion with my understanding of the Text in fact you concurred with my understanding .. The people in Amalekite towns were slaughtered .. men, women, childern, babies and fetuses. .. Ethnic Cleansing 101 - Genocide actually.
They were not wiped out (don't you know the bible?) and no definition of them is made up. But we'll just file that away as another wrong thing you said.and wiped out they were .... ethnically cleansed .. by every legal definition .. sans the one's the Israeli's make up on the fly .. as does every warring nation.
How many do you need? Draw the line for me please. Is it an absolute value or a percentage? How is membership established?Previously you denied "Ethnic Cleansing" now you agree .. and no legitimate definition requires every single member of "The other" be wiped out to fit the definition of Ethnic Cleansing -- don't need to get rid of all the indigenous population to be Genocide .. although the Israelits back in the day were commanded to do so.
Oh, I get it! You're a quadratarian, believing in the father, the son, the holy ghost and the god of the OT. How's that polytheism working out for you? Or are you now buying the Islamic version of things, that the "OT" was changed by lying scribes, so all the texts that your Jesus studied and taught and claimed to live by are lies. That does seem to be your preference as you take the text of the OT and the God in it and claim that God in the OT suddenly disappeared and was replaced by another God. Could you please clarify what flavor of Christian you are?You then say something strange saying "You should now be angry with God" and then requested some righteous indignation.
Why would I be angry with Lord YHWH ? This is not my God .. nor the God of Jesus .. nor of Abraham.. If this is your God .. then it is you who should be angry at the slaughter of innocent children .. and the flip flopping commands .. one day the child is to be killed for the sins of the father .. punished down to the third and fourth generation .. next day its Children are not to be killed for the sins of the father .. each for his own sin .. but that is your issue to condend with .. this Loki like behavior and this trickster like nature of this Jealous God with some of the more base human Characteristics.
what's the title to your brand of polytheism?I prefer the God of Abe and Jesus to Lord YHWH .. so no anger from my end.
There were no Amalekite towns. Why didn't you also mention "cows"?
They were not wiped out (don't you know the bible?) and no definition of them is made up. But we'll just file that away as another wrong thing you said.
How many do you need? Draw the line for me please. Is it an absolute value or a percentage? How is membership established?
Oh, I get it! You're a quadratarian, believing in the father, the son, the holy ghost and the god of the OT. How's that polytheism working out for you? Or are you now buying the Islamic version of things, that the "OT" was changed by lying scribes, so all the texts that your Jesus studied and taught and claimed to live by are lies. That does seem to be your preference as you take the text of the OT and the God in it and claim that God in the OT suddenly disappeared and was replaced by another God. Could you please clarify what flavor of Christian you are?
what's the title to your brand of polytheism?
A fool that you linked to.yeah...that word gets thrown around by all sorts of fools in all sorts of inappropriate contexts.
I favor both finding peace, prosperity, & security....Maybe I'm a fool for favoring the side of Israel. IDK. But I do.
...Maybe I'm a fool for favoring the side of Israel. IDK. But I do.
then why did you mention Amalekite towns (which didn't exist)?The Bible passage you are supposed to be helping us understand is not about the Amalekites
I discussed the biblical events already.but the towns under King Sihon - which underwent ethnic cleansing .. slaughter of men, women, children, babies and fetuses .. but not the cows .. nor the plunder .. did you not understand that part of the passage .. or is it different in ancient Hebrew ? what happens to the cows in your version of the text ?
But if it wasn't everyone? Half? 12?"How many does it take to qualify for Ethnic Cleansing" you asked ? Well Rose .. there is no set number nor percentage - but Slaughtering everyone in a town - men, women, children, babies and fetuses qualifies .. !
There is only one. I don't have to worry about "preferring" one like some polytheist.You exclaim - "OH I get it .. your a quadratarian .. " which is pure nonsense --matters not to the question of the various Gods of the Bible .. I didn't write the book .. nor claim to believe in the Book .. nor disbelieve. Just telling you what the book says in certain places... you have claimed to be an expert in Judaism .. but how then do you not know that Lord YHWH is not the God of Abe ? .. nor the God of Jesus as far as I can tell .. but certainly not Abe's God ... any good OT Scholar knows that these days.
Which is your God ? I told you which one I prefer .. not the "Ethnic Cleansing" God ..
yup. Sometimes, people can be right about one thing and wrong about something else. Or are you unaware of that?A fool that you linked to.
Similar could be said of Hamas. Surrender now! And stop launching the rockets into Israel immediately.This is not about favoratism .. choosing sides .. there is no right side to choose in a blood feud.. as doing so only serves to prolong and worsen the feud.
I choose Israel over "Those @#$ Arabs" as well .. From the River to the Sea .. but that don't mean I support these extremist vigilante's in power currently doing the Ethnic Cleansing thing .. complete with major war crime - crimes against humanity rapport.
The Apartheid conditions of these people in the cage -- if they wern't animals before --- gonna be if ever get out , and this not good for the state of Israel as we found out .. .. nor is the response from the very well armed Muslim nations in the Region .. a good thing for Israel.. and the potential and looming future escalated response .. should this incursion into Gaza continue. .. things could get ugly in a big hurry .. bad things .. not just military but economic .. a real threat of sanctions on the horizon ..
So .. if you favor the side of Israel -- Cease Fire Now .. end the military occupation ASAP
Similar could be said of Hamas. Surrender now! And stop launching the rockets into Israel immediately.
then why did you mention Amalekite towns (which didn't exist)?
I discussed the biblical events already.
But if it wasn't everyone? Half? 12?
There is only one. I don't have to worry about "preferring" one like some polytheist.
To put this thread back on track. This is long, but well worth the read.
Love the "it's gotta be true 'cause the author's a Jew" addendum.Written by a Jewish Holocaust historian: ...
And I answered about them. Now if you would like a separate, theologically based discussion of why there was the biblical injunction then that would be great. This is a subforum for political discussions. Let me know when you want to discuss theology in a religion sub-space.Amalekites were mentioned because they too were ethnicly cleansed
If you claim something that is wrong, then you are going to be told you are wrong.-- and it matters not whether they lived in towns
Upon God's command, there was substantial violence. So?-- like the reference to King Sihon you are supposed to assess .. or villages .. or tent cities .. as is just a deflectionf rom the stark agreed upon fact that the Israelites did some major Ethnic Cleansing.
And to you, that makes them all actual Gods? I can say "Fred is a God" and you would consider him a God? Wow. You are a massive polytheist."There is only one" you say ?! No Friend, there are many God's mentioned in the Bible ... many God's worshiped .. Gods and Sons of Gods..
There is only one God. Remember, I'm a monotheist, not a polytheist.Which one is your favorite ? Do you like the God of Abraham .. the God of Jesus .. Ha Satan .. or perhaps one of those child sacrifice Gods .. Chemosh - God of the Moabites -- Yahu of the Shasu aka YHWH -- or do you prefer Asherah .. or one of the more powerful sons of God Marduk .. or one of the most powerful God of Judaism - Ahura Mazda --- the uncreated one - primordial God of the Annointed one Cyrus.
So you don't understand the idea of monotheism. Got it.So .. what you meant to say perhaps is "There is only one God for me" -- which is wonderful and fine .. but tell us which God might that be ?
In his case, supporting Russia bespeaksyup. Sometimes, people can be right about one thing and wrong about something else. Or are you unaware of that?
Selective as ever.Charming as ever.
You should compare it to thisIn his case, supporting Russia bespeaks
more than the occasional error.
What is a "myth" to you is reality to others.You should compare it to this
Deconstructing the Three Stages of the Nakba Myth
Nakba Day has become the most actively performed ritual of the Palestinian myth - Deconstructing the Three Stages of the Nakba Myth - Shmuel Triganojcpa.org
and see where Baum goes awry.
what is reality to you is a lie to others. People buying into the lies are much like ostriches wearing blinders and then putting their heads in the sand.What is a "myth" to you is reality to others.
Israel apologists are much like Holocaust deniers.Nakba - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org