If a belief has, at best, the same relationship to reality that a map has to its terrain*, then would worshiping a belief be the same as having an idol? Why or why not?
When we worship god how do we know we are worshiping god and not just our beliefs about god?
Suppose, when I am worshiping god, I am also thinking of god (that is, I have a concept of god, a concept of what I am worshiping). If that is the case, then am I not worshiping my belief rather than god? Am I not worshiping the map, rather than the terrain?
Can I worship god without experiencing god? Can I worship the terrain without experiencing the terrain?
__________________________
* A map can be thought of as a way of stating (or symbolizing) the notion that "x is the case". "The map shows the tree is 500 feet from the house."
A belief can be thought of as a proposition stating (or symbolizing) the notion that "x is the case". "I believe the tree is 500 feet from the house."
Therefore, there seem to be at least some similarities between maps and beliefs.
When we worship god how do we know we are worshiping god and not just our beliefs about god?
Suppose, when I am worshiping god, I am also thinking of god (that is, I have a concept of god, a concept of what I am worshiping). If that is the case, then am I not worshiping my belief rather than god? Am I not worshiping the map, rather than the terrain?
Can I worship god without experiencing god? Can I worship the terrain without experiencing the terrain?
__________________________
* A map can be thought of as a way of stating (or symbolizing) the notion that "x is the case". "The map shows the tree is 500 feet from the house."
A belief can be thought of as a proposition stating (or symbolizing) the notion that "x is the case". "I believe the tree is 500 feet from the house."
Therefore, there seem to be at least some similarities between maps and beliefs.
Last edited: