• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

If Assad captures Aleppo, does it mean Mujahideen are crushed?

Servant_of_the_One1

Well-Known Member
Does that mean the war is over and the mujahideen have been crushed?

I think people who thinks that way are very naive.

Even if whole Syria was just one city called Aleppo then it doesnt mean the brave resistance movements are not defeated. They will regroup.

Iam sure the shia terrorist warcriminal Assad is aware of this.
The Syrian nation will never accept his rule.


Two years ago people said war is over because Qusayr was captured by terrorists( assad and hezbullat).
 

Kirran

Premium Member
Does that mean the war is over and the mujahideen have been crushed?

I think people who thinks that way are very naive.

Even if whole Syria was just one city called Aleppo then it doesnt mean the brave resistance movements are not defeated. They will regroup.

Iam sure the shia terrorist warcriminal Assad is aware of this.
The Syrian nation will never accept his rule.


Two years ago people said war is over because Qusayr was captured by terrorists( assad and hezbullat).

Nah, I doubt the capture of Aleppo would mean the end of rebellions either by the Syrian opposition or by Jihadists.
 

Flankerl

Well-Known Member
The problem is that these last parts of Aleppo that are in Jihadist hands are the only parts that are actual cities which the Jihadists control.

The next biggest city held by them is Idlib and it is absolutely dwarfed by Aleppo. Encircling and taking such a small city is relatively easy compared to a major city like Aleppo.
Especially if one considers all the troops that are going to be freed up by taking all of Aleppo.
 

Kirran

Premium Member
Their collaboration with NATO is upsetting though.

I don't think it's as disastrous as you do - it may be needed on a practical level.

Turkish army will remove the Kurdish terrorists

That would be great. The Kurdish regional government in Rojava, on the other hand, I hope they leave alone. As well as the legitimate Kurdish representative organisations in Turkey.
 

Kirran

Premium Member
Which mujahideens? They are all mujahideens. Is there anyone other than Mujahideens?

Yes, lots. All those who are not fighting for the Al-Nusra Front or the Islamic State. With the possible exception of some more extreme factions within the Syrian opposition.
 

Kirran

Premium Member
Yes let's fight the only somewhat sane people in that conflict so that the Islamists take their territory and enslave their people.
10/10

I think you misunderstood me.

I was questioning the characterisation of the Kurdish groups as terrorists by saying yeah, get any terrorists that are Kurds. I was kinda taking the **** because I think Servant's understanding of the Kurdish resistance is questionable.

Rojava is actually by far the best group in the region.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
It doesn't really matter. The fighting will not stop, and it's likely to get worse once Mosul is liberated from IS.
 
Top