So do you believe that when Jesus died, Jesus ascended to heaven in the same body he had while on earth, and that Jesus will return in that same body? Do you believe that heaven is a physical place where physical bodies reside?
Yes, yes, and yes!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
So do you believe that when Jesus died, Jesus ascended to heaven in the same body he had while on earth, and that Jesus will return in that same body? Do you believe that heaven is a physical place where physical bodies reside?
I agree that all biblical scripture was given by inspiration of God, but inspired men are fallible so they can make mistakes and so can those men who compiled the bible. That means that the bible is not inerrant.So you don't believe when Paul wrote
2 Timothy 3:16.
Kjv
16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
But then your going to quote from another verse from the bible written by another ordinary man ,to argue the point
Because, as I just said, there is a lot of room for error whenever fallible men are involved in anything. God by contrast is infallible. Baha'is believe that Jesus and Baha'u'llah were Manifestations of God, and that they are infallible and whatever they would write would be as if God had written it Himself. That means that if Jesus had written anything it would be as if God had written it Himself. Since Baha'u'llah wrote His own scriptures we believe that whatever He wrote is as if God had written it Himself. This is a Baha'i belief called Divine unity and it is based upon what Baha'u'llah wrote:And yes God didn't physically write anything ,that we know of . Why would that make a difference?
Where in the Qur'an does it say that the afterlife (heaven) is a physical place?Yes, yes, and yes!
It comes from the Baha'i Reference Library online. The Baha'i Faith has no clergy so we are responsible to teach ourselves.If the Baha’i organization didn’t teach you anything, then what is all the stuff you constantly post and quote about Bahá’u’lláh?
Okay, then you are still following the teachings the Baha’i organization. What if Baha’u’llah is one of those false Christs or prophets Jesus warned about and said not to believe or listen to ( Matthew 24)?It comes from the Baha'i Reference Library online. The Baha'i Faith has no clergy so we are responsible to teach ourselves.
Baha’i Reference Library (old version)
Baha’i Reference Library (new version, downloadable)
I am mostly quoting from The Works of Bahá'u'lláh
No, I am not following any teachings from the Baha'i organization because the Baha'i organization does not have any "teachings."Okay, then you are still following the teachings the Baha’i organization.
What if He isn't? How could He be a false prophet if He actually fulfilled the Bible prophecies for the return of Christ? You won't be able to show me one other claimant who has fulfilled all the prophecies, I guarantee it.What if Baha’u’llah is one of those false Christs or prophets Jesus warned about and said not to believe or listen to ( Matthew 24)?
Matthew 24:30Please quote Jesus saying that He will do that.
Matthew 24:30 And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.Matthew 24:30
"[the Son of Man will come] on the clouds of heaven, with power and great glory". The Second Coming will not be comparable to the incarnation, if someone says they are the messiah, they're lying; if someone tells you they've met the messiah, they're mistaken. "if anyone says to you, ‘Look, here is the Messiah!’ or, ‘There he is!’ do not believe it."
Jesus did not say we won't have to figure it out, you said that. Rather, Jesus said in many verses that the Son of Man will come as a thief in the night so we should be watching.We are told by Jesus that we won't have to figure it out. "as lightning that comes from the east is visible even in the west, so will be the coming of the Son of Man"
What pray tell do you imagine Matthew 24 to be about if not the, again quoting Jesus, "hour your Lord doth come"?Those verses are not Jesus saying He will return.
No, He just said you won't need people to point out the return.Jesus did not say we won't have to figure it out, you said that.
Indeed. There won't be knowledge of the time, there won't be anyone preparing the way. Jesus will just come and all around the world people will mourn because everyone will know that their time is over.Rather, Jesus said in many verses that the Son of Man will come as a thief in the night so we should be watching.
Evidence of the existence of soul has never been found. Science has been active since about 2,500 years. Can you give me any evidence to believe in existence of soul or Allah or in any Allah choosing someone as his messenger?What do you "know of science" that does not allow you?
It is a Bahai belief that the uneducated 19th Century Iranian preacher was Sayoshyant, Kalki and Maitreya, all rolled in one. Why would other people have this absurd and stupid belief? If you talk of theist Hindus, then they believe that Kalki will come 425,000 years from now at the end of Kaliyuga. I do not believe even in that silliness.They are not "my things." They are other people's beliefs.
For the second coming, these miracles have to be world-wide miracles for everyone to see and experience. They will in fact be witnessed by all live on TV.Unless everyone "witnessed" those miracles, how would they know about them? Would they just believe other people who told them about the miracles?
Why don't you believe in upward of 25,000 'tablets' (for the uninitiated, 'posts in the forum') that I have written? What I have written is none other than Brahman's writing. There is no duality here as was in case of the Iranian preacher - his Allah and himself. Even what the uneducated 19th Century Iranian preacher wrote was second-hand. He was not Allah himself. What I am writing is first-hand, since I am myself Brahman and none other.Since Baha'u'llah wrote His own scriptures we believe that whatever He wrote is as if God had written it Himself.
Matthew 24:42-44What pray tell do you imagine Matthew 24 to be about if not the, again quoting Jesus, "hour your Lord doth come"?
Where did Jesus ever say that?No, He just said you won't need people to point out the return.
But how would people know it was really Jesus? That was the original question on my OP.Indeed. There won't be knowledge of the time, there won't be anyone preparing the way. Jesus will just come and all around the world people will mourn because everyone will know that their time is over.
All Scripture is God-breathed . 2 Tim 3.16 . So your suggesting that God is ok with his message being filled with errors ?I agree that all biblical scripture was given by inspiration of God, but inspired men are fallible so they can make mistakes and so can those men who compiled the bible. That means that the bible is not inerrant.
Because, as I just said, there is a lot of room for error whenever fallible men are involved in anything. God by contrast is infallible. Baha'is believe that Jesus and Baha'u'llah were Manifestations of God, and that they are infallible and whatever they would write would be as if God had written it Himself. That means that if Jesus had written anything it would be as if God had written it Himself. Since Baha'u'llah wrote His own scriptures we believe that whatever He wrote is as if God had written it Himself. This is a Baha'i belief called Divine unity and it is based upon what Baha'u'llah wrote:
"The essence of belief in Divine unity consisteth in regarding Him Who is the Manifestation of God and Him Who is the invisible, the inaccessible, the unknowable Essence as one and the same. By this is meant that whatever pertaineth to the former, all His acts and doings, whatever He ordaineth or forbiddeth, should be considered, in all their aspects, and under all circumstances, and without any reservation, as identical with the Will of God Himself." Gleanings, p. 167
That is what Jesus meant when He said "I and my Father are one" (John 10:30). To Baha'is that verse means that Jesus and God are one and the same, so whatever pertains to Jesus, all His acts and doings, are identical with the Will of God Himself.
That is essentially what Baha'u'llah did.If Jesus had his 2nd coming, you'd recognize him. He'd be the one nailed to "another" cross, accused of helping the poor, healing the sick (advocating universal health care--Obamacare), opposing war (accused of being anti-American), etc.
They don't, because they are still waiting for the Messiah/Promised One that they have made in their own image, according to their respective beliefs regarding what he will be like and do.It is a Bahai belief that the uneducated 19th Century Iranian preacher was Sayoshyant, Kalki and Maitreya, all rolled in one. Why would other people have this absurd and stupid belief?
Where did you ever get such an idea? You certainly did not get it from the Bible.For the second coming, these miracles have to be world-wide miracles for everyone to see and experience. They will in fact be witnessed by all live on TV.
Anything less (like Bahaullah's words) does not qualify.
What Bahaollah did was for his own ego. He wanted to be an even greater Mohammad. Bahaollah did not do work for his living in all his life. He thrived on the funding by his followers, lived in large mansions in with three wives and fourteen children, except for short periods when he was imprisoned. Other religious leaders also do that.That is essentially what Baha'u'llah did.