questfortruth
Well-Known Member
DISCLAIMER:What in the toxic misogyny is this OP?
I love members of LGBTq, Me to, Feminism, Black Lives Matter. Please do not see in the thread any of wrong-hood.
This makes no sense. None. It is Agenticity at its finest; a conscious, intentional attempt to attribute human qualities to a non-human object. It's utter dribble. Sorry to be harsh, but I struggle to find a gentler way to express myself.
science doesn't hold a certain thing to be true because its "logical" or "sounds right".
Science is "knowledge"; it has no emotion;
The quote, which most likely belongs to Armand de Richelieu:
"Give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest
person, and I will find in them something to hang him for.''
Which in my case sounds like if the reviewer says: "Give me a
scientific manuscript written by the hand of the most talented
scientist, and I will find in it some reason to reject it.''
This injustice is wishful thinking. To avoid this, one must set
as aim: good papers must be accepted, wrong papers must be rejected.
And never vice versa!
I've never understood the point of "sending [his] son to die for us". What exactly was God trying to achieve, and why did anyone, let alone God's own son, have to die to achieve it?
1. God is not a sinner, so it was not a suicide mission. They murdered Godman. There are verses in the Bible, which tell, that God has not wanted for Jesus to die. Otherwise, the Judas would not go to hell for the sin of Betrayal.
2. conventional medicine like Prozak, Rispolept, Goloperidon has no effect on Atheism, Evolutionism, and the "Big Bang giving life" idea.
To cure these states of mind the drinking of the Holy Innocent Blood of Godman and Eating His Holy Body is absolutely necessary.
There was no other way for human beings to be saved, only a perfect sacrifice was good enough, Jesus Christ.
Science is supposed to be all about the facts. If that were the case, it would make for a boring woman. The reason females are interesting is partly due to them not thinking in a linear fashion. Yes, it's sometimes frustrating and irritating, but it does keep things interesting.
But science is ultimately wrong most of the time, so yeah, it could be female.
No other way for humans to be saved? Hypothetically, isn't it God's choice to do whatever He wants with humans? If He wants to save humans, then He can save them.
Even setting aside the question of whether God even exists at all, how can any human being speak with reliable authority on what God actually wants?
"I am founding my Church" (Jesus Christ, Bible). "Holy Spirit will teach you everything" (Jesus Christ, Bible)
Who should we blame when a plane crashes and kills one or two hundred people?
Who should we blame for hurricanes, tsunamis, lightning strike, hail damage, cot death?
God is Spirit. There are two spirits. God Jesus and the false god (satan, evil spirit).
Blame for every bad thing the satan. Never blame loving Jesus, who died for me.
You said there was a revolt, a rejection of God, which justifies God's methods.
We can not judge God the Highest Suverene Judge. He has way more power over us than Biden and Putin together. He can execute us without making sin at any moment. Hereby He is doing always GOOD, even by executing us in hell.
God had deliberately denied knowledge of good and evil to Adam and Eve
That is false knowledge. It is wishful thinking. "You will be like gods" (says satan in Genesis).
Fake, ill, dying gods. So, if you are truly god, then tell us please is the Riemann Hypothesis true or not?