• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

If soul is reduced to Physics, how atheists believe in soul?

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
You have confused atheism with Science. Scientists await more evidence for God. The atheism denies the possibility of God. It is because Atheism is philosophy, but Science is objectivity.

Well, science is also philosophy, if you look closer and there is indeed no one true science. If you look at other cultures than the Anglo-Saxon science is not the same.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
"I don't know." is 'Agnosticism'. Atheism is a denial, subject to production of evidence (as you said). Hard/Strong atheism is a irretractable denial (no chance of any such evidence being produced).

Yeah, I am a strong atheist, being an advaitist, since I believe in existence of just one entity, me (which means Brahman, and which constitutes all things in the universe without a second). :)

I like how you in effect tell me, what I am as an atheist. Well, atheism is not that simple:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atheism-agnosticism/#DefiAthe
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
You have a different belief. That is OK, Mikkel. We are confronted with different beliefs all the time, even in our families. No two "true Hindus" :) are ever likely to have the same opinion. :D
The antitheist just dials it up to 11 and states, "I know already, God isn't there!"

Personally, I can't resolve Advaita and atheism, but in my experience, I feel the connection so denying it is pointless. Maybe, if you take the take of "belief not being required", but I find it puzzling against. I rely on belief at all, just my subjective experience. :D
I am not an anti-theist. I am an orthodox Hindu (Gaudapada type - Gaudapada - Wikipedia, Gaudapadacharya Math - Wikipedia). It is just that my Advaita belief dictates non-acceptance of the possibility of existence of any God. If I believe that something other than Brahman exists, then in my view, I am not an advaitist. And that is what science says, we started with a ball of energy.
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
I find it inconsistent, that modern atheists deny Existent God in favor of Non-existent one because they accept everything, which is not the Existing God: e.g., the satan, freewill, love, hope, and soul.

.
Just taking this line ....
Atheists do not believe in Satan
Atheists do not believe in the Soul. If you mean soul music - I'll give you that.
Freewill, love and hope are not limited to god believing people, they are secular concepts.
 

February-Saturday

Devil Worshiper
Please do not put trust in the information, that these satanists do not believe in satan. It is because even Trump can publically lie.

As somebody that was once a theistic Satanist, I can absolutely testify that not only do LaVeyan Satanists not believe in Satan but many of them are actively hostile towards Satanists that do.

That said, you're actually sort of right. LaVey was a Pantheist who believed in magic, and a few theistic Satanist movements splintered off from the Church of Satan. As LaVey aged, though, he became an outright atheist and the CoS has followed suit ever since. If the Church of Satan did believe in Satan, there are a lot of splinter factions that wouldn't exist.

Certainly, whether the church hierarchy itself believes in Satan or not, most LaVeyan Satanists that join the church don't. And if they do believe in Satan, they would not be considered atheists anymore.
 

Mindmaster

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
You have a different belief. That is OK, Mikkel. We are confronted with different beliefs all the time, even in our families. No two "true Hindus" :) are ever likely to have the same opinion. :DI am not an anti-theist. I am an orthodox Hindu (Gaudapada type - Gaudapada - Wikipedia, Gaudapadacharya Math - Wikipedia). It is just that my Advaita belief dictates non-acceptance of the possibility of existence of any God. If I believe that something other than Brahman exists, then in my view, I am not an advaitist. And that is what science says, we started with a ball of energy.

Yes, I've especially noticed the two Hindu's don't agree on everything. Much to my dismay, lol.

Most of my readings have been in the commentaries of Adi Shankara, Ramana Maharshi, and even Swami Vivekananda. There is probably more written then I'll ever have time to read. :D

I do find science completely congruent with Advaita, as you have said. Different sets of eyes can see the same light, though through the act of seeing it they color and have their own impressions. I'm learning this is much the overarching commonality in Hinduism in general.

I don't believe anything but experience it. I feel others' emotions as my own and so on, and for a while found it really hard to explain how that happens. There is only one explanation to me: One 'thing' pretending to be many to the casual observer, lol.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
INTRODUCTION:


MY CONTRIBUTION:

I find it inconsistent, that modern atheists deny Existent God in favor of Non-existent one because they accept everything, which is not the Existing God: e.g., the satan, freewill, love, hope, and soul.

And believe it or not, but Physics can be reduced to mathematics in the way down to Absolute Solipsism: "the mathematical universe hypothesis" (Wikipedia). However, that is not true, because the "virtual terms" are used in Physics (it is my contribution Gravity Law Without Universalism is Solving Many Tasks, viXra.org e-Print archive, viXra:2007.0112
). These virtual terms can not be reduced to mathematics.


Methinks you need to learn the meaning of atheism before making irrelevant claims about atheism.

Atheism : The disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

Nothing more, nothing less
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
There is only one explanation to me: One 'thing' pretending to be many to the casual observer, lol.
It does not pretend. It is what it is, all the time. We in our ignorance (ajnana, maya) take it to be something other than what it really is. :D
 

`mud

Just old
Premium Member
Amazing to me is the fact that `God` ignores the non-believers.
`He` doesn't really care whether or not we a's give a crap !
I haven't heard or had a thought from `God` or `His` angels !
Now, if `God` doesn't care, why the hell do you all ?
Just don't understand the the believer's crooked thinking !
 

A Vestigial Mote

Well-Known Member
... they accept everything, which is not the Existing God: e.g., the satan, freewill, love, hope, and soul...
You sure about this? I'm quite sure that if you ask atheists which of these things they "accept," your results will vary.

I'm in the "camp" that:
  • Does NOT believe in Satan, nor soul.
  • Is unsure about "freewill" - I feel the jury's still out on that one.
  • Accepts "love" as a subjective experience.
Don't be so hyperbolic. It is going to make it hard for many to care what you are saying.
 

`mud

Just old
Premium Member
Some of the STUFF produced here is Trumpian in nature !

Why exclude: Love, freewill, hope !

Saying that the supreme, ultimate, ordained by.....""LEADER""
Who ordained your Christian `God`, so we could worship `Him` ?

It's all about ordaining someone to the `BOSS`, who does it ??

NuffStuff
 

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I find it inconsistent, that modern atheists deny Existent God in favor of Non-existent one because they accept everything, which is not the Existing God: e.g., the satan, freewill, love, hope, and soul.
Really?

I'm not technically an atheist, but I'm an unbeliever. I admit the existence of any number of imaginary gods, but there isn't even a definition of a real god such that if we found a real candidate we could tell whether it was God, or a god, or not.

Nor is there a definition of a real supernatural state or a real supernatural being that would allow us to determine whether any real thing is such a being or in such a state. That rules out any real Satan and any real soul.

Love however is a physical state of attraction explained by evolution and biology, the advantage of pair-bonding through hormonal responses, not least with oxytocin. Love is a particular set of real brainstates ie love is real.

As is hope, simply part of the evolved ability of the brain to consider future possibilities and to have emotional responses to those possibilities.

As for freewill, yes we all know of occasions when we can decide between A and B independently of external coercion.

However, we know of no instances where the brain can make non-random decisions dependently of its evolved and physical decision-making processes.
And believe it or not, but Physics can be reduced to mathematics in the way down to Absolute Solipsism: "the mathematical universe hypothesis" (Wikipedia).
I don't think the universe is mathematics. That would mean that without humans the universe doesn't exist, since maths is entirely conceptual, and humans are the only critters we know of that do maths that's at all complex.
 
Last edited:
Top