If the Democrats want to replace Biden for their POTUS 2024 candidate, why don't they simply switch their support over to RFK Jr?

[Twilight Hue]

For people who prefer an all powerful monarch,
no problem. But there are risks to granting such
power.
Pol Pot
Kim Jong Un
Mao Zedong
Fidel Castro
Joseph Stalin
Vlad Putin
Idi Amin

It's only a bad think if you run afoul of them.

How can you forget the Deuce?

 

[Soandso]

It seems king has been brought up quite a bit lately.

Q.... Are kings/queens a bad thing?

They are an outdated thing, much like feudalism is. There's a reason those things are being relegated to the past more and more

 

[Stevicus]

Have you seen his polling numbers? He couldn't win against Donald Duck.

Even if Donald was involved in numerous scandals, criminal trials/convictions, and other questionable aspects of his character. He also has shady ties. That Scrooge McDuck was a bad influence.

Snoopy could probably win.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

The majority doesn't want him replaced. You're focusing on a minority position. Biden doesn't need to be replaced to win the election.
Nothing new was learned during the debate, nothing changed.

That seems like some harecore denialsm. Like how Reps downplay Global Warming.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

@Revoltingest, well, I am a Christian and definitely not for Trump (or Biden). Most people I know and associate with are not for either one.

Your own article says that white conservative evangelicals are the bedrock of the movement for Trump. None of the articles even says that all, or even most, Christians are MAGAs because they definitely are not. I for one refuse to be lumped into that bunch.

Evangelicals refer to certain Protestants. You, as a Catholic, are not one of them.

 

[Kathryn]

Evangelicals refer to certain Protestants. You, as a Catholic, are not one of them.

I know and I am glad.

 

[Revoltingest]

How can you forget the Deuce?

There are many others.
I left it for you to list them all.

 

[Twilight Hue]

There are many others.
I left it for you to list them all.

Thanks that was a lot of fun!

 

[Whateverist]

Have you seen his polling numbers? He couldn't win against Donald Duck.

And yes, keeping Trump from winning is the most important thing -- if Americans wish to remain Americans.

And he is a Reynold's aluminum wearing loony. It is a relief to know he can't win at least now if we could just eliminate the threat of DJT.

 

[Saint Frankenstein]

It seems king has been brought up quite a bit lately.

Q.... Are kings/queens a bad thing?

They aren't. I'd much rather have a brave and honorable king or queen who cares for and leads their people with virtue, than politicians. We need to get rid of politicians in business suits ruling us with corruption and lies, who rob us blind and send the poor and working class to die in their wars for profit.

 

[We Never Know]

They are an outdated thing, much like feudalism is. There's a reason those things are being relegated to the past more and more

Over 40 places have kings, queens or emperors.

Are those places outdated?

 

[Jayhawker Soule]

I'm not a Democrat, but I am curious about why Democrats who want to replace Biden as their POTUS 2024 candidate, don't simply switch their support for RFK Jr.

Perhaps because Democrats want a President who is neither a white nationalist autocrat nor an embarrassing fool.

 

[Soandso]

Over 40 places have kings, queens or emperors.

Are those places outdated?

A lot of those are "monarchies" where prime ministers actually run the show in any meaningful capacity. The others are oftentimes brutal dictatorships. When we compare what we have to the past when kingdoms and empires were the only thing that existed, kingdoms in this day and age have greatly diminished and are largely irrelevant

 

[LuisDantas]

I'm not a Democrat, but I am curious about why Democrats who want to replace Biden as their POTUS 2024 candidate, don't simply switch their support for RFK Jr. It seems like switching support for him would be the solution for the problem of finding a replacement.

Is it more important to them that Biden be their candidate, or is it more important to them that Trump isn't re-elected?

I don't get why Democrats who want to ditch Biden don't seem to be interested in taking advantage of this seemingly simple solution.

Do Democrats object to having RFK Jr. as their candidate & if so, what exactly is the reason?

RFK Jr. is a fascistic nutso.

 

[We Never Know]

A lot of those are "monarchies" where prime ministers actually run the show in any meaningful capacity. The others are oftentimes brutal dictatorships. When we compare what we have to the past when kingdoms and empires were the only thing that existed, kingdoms in this day and age have greatly diminished and are largely irrelevant

Yes. ..

mon·arch
noun
1. a sovereign head of state, especially a king, queen, or emperor.

 

[Laniakea]

Perhaps because Democrats want a President who is neither a white nationalist autocrat nor an embarrassing fool.

Then why do democrats keep nominating those types if that's not what they want?

 

[Soandso]

Yes. ..

mon·arch
noun
1. a sovereign head of state, especially a king, queen, or emperor.

Sure, but that doesn't really address my points

 

[Jayhawker Soule]

Then why do democrats keep nominating those types if that's not what they want?

 

[Jayhawker Soule]

Perhaps because Democrats want a President who is neither a white nationalist autocrat nor an embarrassing fool.

Then why do democrats keep nominating those types if that's not what they want?

If taken seriously, that amounts to a remarkably stupid characterization of Barak Obama.

 

[Laniakea]

If taken seriously, that amounts to a remarkably stupid characterization of Barak Obama.

Stupid, as in "The cops acted stupidly" Barack insane Yo Mama?