• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Illusion and Reality

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member
are forms illusory and fleeting while action is reality?


like sheep appearing to look like sheep in form but not necessarily acting as sheep in behavior? a tree is known by it's productivity and not it's appearance?




 

Onoma

Active Member
" are forms illusory "

I would say " yes "

The example I would offer is perspective art, where the geometric form as seen by the observer changes under rotation
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
" are forms illusory "

I would say " yes "

The example I would offer is perspective art, where the geometric form as seen by the observer changes under rotation
Like this (if you haven't seen it before, there is no movement)?

Cubes-a728.gif


Mind-bending optical illusion makes stationary cubes appear to move | Metro News
 
Last edited:

Onoma

Active Member
Like this (if you haven't seen it before, there is no movement)?

View attachment 42077

*has seizure*

No, seriously, very similar to that

I was thinking of wire perspective art, where a sculpture takes different form when seen from different perspectives

An example would be a wire square, it's a square from one view, a rectangle from another or a line from another
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
*has seizure*

No, seriously, very similar to that

I was thinking of wire perspective art, where a sculpture takes different form when seen from different perspectives

An example would be a wire square, it's a square from one view, a rectangle from another or a line from another

I think I know what you mean. Our brains are great at misinterpreting what our eyes see - another one (I'm rather fond of these), and I don't know if you have read any of this person's work - worth a look if not but might be dated now:

Richard Gregory - Wikipedia

0_Optical-illusion.jpg
 

Onoma

Active Member
I think I know what you mean. Our brains are great at misinterpreting what our eyes see - another one (I'm rather fond of these), and I don't know if you have read any of this person's work - worth a look if not but might be dated now:

Richard Gregory - Wikipedia

View attachment 42079

No, actually, first time I've heard of him, thank you

I definitely think he's right about Bayesian processing in the brain though

A great indication of this is the ability of the brain to fill in the correct letters ( Typoglycemia ) when the letters in a sentence are scrambled ( As long as the first and last letters in words are in the right place, the brain can still read it , in most cases )

" Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe "

I tend to maintain the position that our brains are much more intelligent than we are
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
are forms illusory and fleeting while action is reality?


like sheep appearing to look like sheep in form but not necessarily acting as sheep in behavior? a tree is known by it's productivity and not it's appearance?




Even illusions have a reality all their own.
 

McBell

Unbound
are forms illusory and fleeting while action is reality?
s known by it's productivity and not it's appearance?
Sometimes.
Sometimes it is the action that is the illusion whilst the forms are reality.
Sometimes both are illusory
and sometimes both are reality.
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
if you think that was amazing.....

see Brain Games.....the science series

On UK TV (Freeview)? But always worth a look when such can be viewed. One reason why I've always had an interest in psychology and all things associated with such - like how we can be deceived by all the various ways our senses can do so, and also how our thinking can be askew similarly.
 

McBell

Unbound
On UK TV (Freeview)? But always worth a look when such can be viewed. One reason why I've always had an interest in psychology and all things associated with such - like how we can be deceived by all the various ways our senses can do so, and also how our thinking can be askew similarly.
your senses merely record, it is your brain that analyzes.
Thus the reason you can have five different descriptions of the same accident from three people.
 

`mud

Just old
Premium Member
Ahh...the grand old Pituitary !
We are less aware to our senses than we thought !
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
your senses merely record, it is your brain that analyzes.
Thus the reason you can have five different descriptions of the same accident from three people.

I was meaning that we can misinterpret all our senses, even if it is the brain doing so.
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
are forms illusory and fleeting while action is reality?


like sheep appearing to look like sheep in form but not necessarily acting as sheep in behavior? a tree is known by it's productivity and not it's appearance?




Yes, form is an illusion because every form are build up by atoms protons and so on, and between all of them there is empty space, so what your physical eyes see as "solid" is in fact always moving and changing.
It counts for everything within this physical world we call universe.
 

McBell

Unbound
I was meaning that we can misinterpret all our senses, even if it is the brain doing so.
I agree.
Thus begging the question how much of the illusion is what we perceive and how much is how we analyze what we perceive?

This is of course not including the parts of reality that are perceived as illusion.
 

Brickjectivity

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
are forms illusory and fleeting while action is reality?
You make a lot of threads and likely cannot remember all of the replies.

Form versus action is meaningless in your question. Every action is permanently set in time, time which never ends as far as anyone can tell. Therefore action is a form, and every act is a form of its own. There are no classes of forms, nor are there separate actions (physically). All are connected like branches connect to a trunk. For example the kind man who is nice is in the same universe as the mean man who is not. We try to find similar actions and think of them in classes, but that's us.
 

Fool

ALL in all
Premium Member
You make a lot of threads and likely cannot remember all of the replies.

Form versus action is meaningless in your question. Every action is permanently set in time, time which never ends as far as anyone can tell. Therefore action is a form, and every act is a form of its own. There are no classes of forms, nor are there separate actions (physically). All are connected like branches connect to a trunk. For example the kind man who is nice is in the same universe as the mean man who is not. We try to find similar actions and think of them in classes, but that's us.

A form is static a motion is dynamic. So no, I disagree. And yes some days I create threads and some days I just respond. I visit less than I used to
 
Top