sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
The church, by and large, would disagree with you. Anointing is done with chrism, not water.I think sprinkling is more like anointing. Baptism is like bathing.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The church, by and large, would disagree with you. Anointing is done with chrism, not water.I think sprinkling is more like anointing. Baptism is like bathing.
Nobody believes poured water is dunking which is the real meaning of baptism. If you believe sprinkling is dunking then that is your problem for solving I think.I thought you just said that "no one really believes poured water is baptism?"
OK. Please learn to read BEFORE debate. I said "like".The church, by and large, would disagree with you. Anointing is done with chrism, not water.
Baptism means "immersing." One can be 'immersed" without being "dunked." I bathe every day by immersing myself in the shower.Nobody believes poured water is dunking which is the real meaning of baptism. If you believe sprinkling is dunking then that is your problem for solving I think.
Oh, I get the "like." Thing is, it's not "like" anointing if it doesn't use chrism.OK. Please learn to read BEFORE debate. I said "like".
And you get wet all over. Try again.Baptism means "immersing." One can be 'immersed" without being "dunked." I bathe every day by immersing myself in the shower.
But it is. A little oil, a little water. Similar.Oh, I get the "like." Thing is, it's not "like" anointing if it doesn't use chrism.
What's your point? That something has to be "exact" in order for God's grace to work? Or is it the intent and the heart that are important to the process? I take a shower and immerse myself in the water. In baptism, one is immersed in the sprinkling. Since it's not the water that's efficacious, the "all over" part doesn't really matter. In fact, the ancient Christians specified "living" (moving) water for baptism. Most evangelical baptistries don't have moving water. And that seems to be OK. But even the ancients said that if living water was not available, "other water" was fine. "Other water" would include sprinkling (which BTW, is closer to "living" water [since it is in motion] than is the typical baptistry water). My point is that the method doesn't matter.And you get wet all over. Try again.
Water is water. Oil is oil. And the intent is completely different. An anointing is a blessing. Baptism is a cleansing.But it is. A little oil, a little water. Similar.
Ya, but a person is not "immersed in the sprinkling". A small part of the body gets wet with sprinkling. Like a small part of the body gets oily with anointing. That is not my opinion. It is fact.What's your point? That something has to be "exact" in order for God's grace to work? Or is it the intent and the heart that are important to the process? I take a shower and immerse myself in the water. In baptism, one is immersed in the sprinkling. Since it's not the water that's efficacious, the "all over" part doesn't really matter. In fact, the ancient Christians specified "living" (moving) water for baptism. Most evangelical baptistries don't have moving water. And that seems to be OK. But even the ancients said that if living water was not available, "other water" was fine. "Other water" would include sprinkling (which BTW, is closer to "living" water [since it is in motion] than is the typical baptistry water). My point is that the method doesn't matter.
Ok, now you are trying me. Do many Christians believe in Christian superiority? Are kings superior? Do they get to be rulers by an anointing? Please think! Thank you.Water is water. Oil is oil. And the intent is completely different. An anointing is a blessing. Baptism is a cleansing.
Sure they are! If not actually, then spiritually (which is the whole point).Ya, but a person is not "immersed in the sprinkling". A small part of the body gets wet with sprinkling. Like a small part of the body gets oily with anointing. That is not my opinion. It is fact.
I don't know; some do. I certainly don't.Do many Christians believe in Christian superiority?
What do kings have to do with this??? Take your own advice and think! We're talking about Christians, not kings.Are kings superior? Do they get to be rulers by an anointing?
It's a spiritual death, not an actual death. The means doesn't matter. The intent matters.Christian baptism means dying and a washing away of sins. A sprinkling of a little water kills a person how?
People for Christ get baptized because he did. How was he baptized?Sure they are! If not actually, then spiritually (which is the whole point).
Really? must I believe sprinkling is the same as immersion? Am I wrong and you are right that immersion and sprinkling are the same things?I don't know; some do. I certainly don't.
No we were talking about an anointing. You said sprinkling is not like anointing.What do kings have to do with this??? Take your own advice and think! We're talking about Christians, not kings.
IF organizations which sprinkle babies immersed adults then people would ask why the difference and church elders would have no answer. That would be bad. So they sprinkle babies AND adults. Can a baby intend to do anything at all?It's a spiritual death, not an actual death. The means doesn't matter. The intent matters.
With water. In a river. Does it really matter? No.People for Christ get baptized because he did. How was he baptized?
No, but you should respect that other people do.Really? must I believe sprinkling is the same as immersion?
They're both valid baptism. In that sense, they're the same thing.Am I wrong and you are right that immersion and sprinkling are the same things?
It's not. Sprinkling is baptism. Anointing isn't.No we were talking about an anointing. You said sprinkling is not like anointing.
That's not true. I've been in churches where both are done. I've done both. There's absolutely no problem.IF organizations which sprinkle babies immersed adults then people would ask why the difference and church elders would have no answer.
Its parents and fellow churchgoers can.Can a baby intend to do anything at all?
Then you should respect that other people don't.No, but you should respect that other people do.
Like control?Its parents and fellow churchgoers can.
I do -- I just don't respect the undue judgment placed upon me by those who don't.Then you should respect that other people don't.
No, like making decisions for their kids that kids aren't able to make for themselves. Can infants/toddlers decide for themselves what they will eat, where they will sleep, when they will nap, who they will play with, what they will wear? Is that "control?" Why is spiritual nourishment any different? Answer: It's not.Like control?
How am I judging you? I disagree with you.I do -- I just don't respect the undue judgment placed upon me by those who don't.
Are you calling baptism spiritual nourishment?No, like making decisions for their kids that kids aren't able to make for themselves. Can infants/toddlers decide for themselves what they will eat, where they will sleep, when they will nap, who they will play with, what they will wear? Is that "control?" Why is spiritual nourishment any different? Answer: It's not.
I didn't say you did. Do you have a guilty conscience?How am I judging you? I disagree with you.
Of course! Any sacrament is spiritual nourishment.Are you calling baptism spiritual nourishment?
OKI didn't say you did. Do you have a guilty conscience?
It happens once.Of course! Any sacrament is spiritual nourishment.